Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reading on antigone the character
Character Analysis Of Antigone In The Play Antigone
Reading on antigone the character
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reading on antigone the character
Antigone, The Gone Girl
In the play, “Antigone” by Sophocles, a young girl is trying to bury her brother after Polyneices and Eteocles have been killed in battle. The king, Creon, will not allow a burial for Polyneices. Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development demonstrates the stages of moral development the mind goes through. The fifth stage of Kohlberg’s Theory, “Social Contract”, best describes Creon throughout the play. The stage best classifies Creon because his social mutuality will change over the course of the play. Because of Creon’s actions in the beginning of the play and the end of the play, the fifth stage of Kohlberg’s Theory best demonstrates Creon’s actions throughout the play.
Kohlberg believed that people progressed in their moral reasoning through a series of stages. Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development consists of three levels with six stages divided
…show more content…
into two stages per level. “Kohlberg’s Theory was started when he performed tests on very young children as his subjects. Kohlberg found out that children are faced with different moral issues. Kohlberg wanted to find out the reasons why these children think that the character is morally right or not” (Sincero). Kohlberg believed that individuals could only progress through these stages one stage at a time. Kohlberg believed that most moral development occurs through social interaction. Kohlberg's Theory is about how people justify behaviors and his stages are not a method of ranking how moral someone’s behavior is. Creon, at the beginning of the play, is an individual man that finds himself to be the best king of the world. Creon thinks he is the person to make the decisions of the world. Creon only thinks about himself. At the beginning of the play, Creon states, “Polyneices, I say/ is to have no burial: no man is to touch him or say the least prayer for/ him; he shall lie on the plain, unburied; and the birds and the/ scavenging dogs can do with him whatever they like” (1. 169-173) Creon also says whoever buries Polyneices is to be killed. This statement categorizes Creon in Level 1; stage 1 of Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development at the beginning of the play. The statement by Creon shows that he wants obedience from the people of the kingdom. If the people of the kingdom do not want to obey the law of Creon, then the people shall be punished by death or removed from the kingdom. Creon is a dynamic character throughout the play because of the actions he makes.
Creon changes his morality throughout the play. Creon states “I will go./Bring axes, servants:/ Come with me to the tomb. I buried her, i/ will set her free./ Oh quickly!/ My mind misgive/ the laws of the gods are mighty, and a man must serve them/ to the last day of his life!” (5.874-880). The statement by Creon shows how he begins to care for the life of Antigone and he goes to free her from the cave cell. The statement by Creon categorizes him in Level 3 at stage 5 in Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development. This statement by Creon shows that he has change and looks at the values of different people to make his decisions. Creon listened to Choragos to make his decision into going to get Antigone, setting her free and burying Polyneices. This change for Creon categorizes him as a dynamic character in the play. At the beginning of the play Creon was at stage 2 and towards the end of the play, Creon is at stage 5. Creon has changed throughout the story and moved down stages on Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral
Development. In conclusion, Creon has developed different types of morality while he was king throughout the play. Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development is universal principles that people follow in order to be categorized on Kohlberg’s Theory. Creon was about obedience and punishment at the beginning of the story and towards the end of the story he developed into a person who looks at values of different people before coming up with a decision. Creon at the beginning of the story locked, Antigone up inside a cave cell to die of starvation for burying Polyneices. Later throughout the play, Choragos tells Creon “Go quickly, free Antigone from her vault And build a tomb for the body of Polyneices” (5.867-868) This shows that he made a big mistake for locking up Antigone and he has to let her out. Creon goes to unlock Antigone but finds she killed herself. This changes Creon for the rest of the play.
Human emotions and beliefs can be some of the most powerful and forceful factors in the world. They can often time cause humans to overlook their moral and civil duties and instead confront the demands of a private passion. Two people that have contrasting views about passion and responsibility can cause a major conflict which could cause a “classic war” in literature. In the play Antigone, the differences in Antigone and Creon’s passions and responsibilities helps Sophocles illustrate their central flaws. By doing so, the playwright implies that one needs to achieve a balance of passion and responsibility in order to maintain a sense if inner peace and political stability.
Sophocles wrote many characters, each with complex personalities. But none a character quite like the personality of Creon from the play, Antigone. Creon is a complex character, but from the writing of Sophocles, we can reveal his true nature.
Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development is three levels consisting of two stages in each. Kohlberg’s Theory explains how a human’s mind morally develops. Level one is typically common in younger children. The two stages in level one are pre-conventional stages. Stage one is obedience and punishment driven; one will judge an action by the consequences given. Stage two is out of self interest. Level two is mostly common in teenagers. The stages in this level
Sophocles play titled Antigone, embellishes the opposing conflicts between Antigone who stands for the values of family, and Creon who stands for the values of state. Sophocles explores the depths of Antigone’s morality and the duty based on consequence throughout the play, as well as the practical consequences of Creon who is passionate and close-minded. Although Antigone’s moral decisions appear to be more logical and favorable than Creon’s, a personal argument would be that both characters’ decisions in society can be equally justified.
The hubris resonating throughout the play, ‘Antigone’ is seen in the characters of Creon and Antigone. Their pride causes them to act impulsively, resulting in their individual downfalls. In his opening speech, Creon makes his motives clear, that “no man who is his country’s enemy shall call himself my friend.” This part of his declaration was kept to the letter, as he refused burial for his nephew, Polynices. However, when the situation arises where it is crucial that Creon takes advice, he neglects the part of the speech where he says “a king... unwilling to seek advice is damned.” This results in Creon’s tragic undoing.
In the awe-inspiring play of Antigone, Sophocles introduces two remarkable characters, Antigone and Creon. A conflict between these two obstinate characters leads to fatal consequences for themselves and their kindred. The firm stances of Creon and Antigone stem from two great imperatives: his loyalty to the state and her dedication to her family, her religion but most of all her conscience. The identity of the tragic hero of this play is still heavily debated. This tragedy could have been prevented if it had not been for Creon's pitiful mistakes.
In Antigone by Sophocles, Creon is portrayed as a character with excessive pride. From the beginning, Creon demonstrates his authority and continues to make use of it throughout the play. At the end of Antigone, it may seem that Creon changed after realizing the consequences of his actions. However, his dialogue indicates that he still possesses a sense of pride. Creon remains a static character through the play. Creon’s arrogance is displayed in his language and behavior; interaction with others; and his reactions to his environment.
In all works of literature you will find characters that change. From Oedipus the King to Antigone, Creon changes a great deal. In Oedipus the King, Creon has no intention whatsoever of being king. By the end of the play he makes it clear that his intentions have changed and he does want to take Oedipus’s power and become King of Thebes. When we see Creon in Antigone he has become king and he begins to make his mistakes.
Antigone, a tragic drama written by Sophocles explores the different ranges of characters: static and dynamic or flat and round. Creon, King of Thebes in the dramatic play Antigone takes on the role that of a static character. Throughout the whole play Creon believed the idea that he was above the law of the Gods and his decrees cannot be disputed. Unknowingly, who would think that Creon’s sense of pride would cause him the life of his wife, son, and niece? However, at the very end of the play Creon returns to the palace, holding his son’s lifeless body, where he finds out that his wife has killed herself as well. Overwhelmed with grief about the death of his loved ones, Creon turns to the Chorus and says, “Lead me away. I have been rash and foolish. I have killed my son and wife. I look for comfort; my comfort lies here dead. Whatever my hands have touched come to nothing. Fate has brought all my pride to thought of dust” (1833). Creon takes responsibility of the death of his son and wife by calling himself a “rash” man and this is where Creon undergoes the changes of a dynamic character by admitting that he was wrong.
Creon does not learn a lesson from Oedipus' accusatory behavior. Instead he adapts this bad personality trait. Throughout Antigone, he accuses everyone who tries to give him advice of betraying him. Whereas, in Oedipus, he is falsely accused by Oedipus of trying to take over the throne. This paper will compare and contrast his behavior and evaluate if he learned anything from one play to the next.
In the following paper, I plan to discuss the source of conflict between the title characters of Antigone and Creon in Sophocles’ “Antigone”. I also plan to discuss how each character justifies his or her actions and what arguments they give for their justifications. I will also write about the strengths and weaknesses of these arguments. The final points I try to make are about who Sophocles thinks is right and who I think is right.
Antigone’s first words in Antigone, “My own flesh and blood”, strongly indicates that the play’s concern with family relationships. “I admit I did it. I won’t deny that.”(line 500) Antigone is bold in her defiance, believes firmly that she is right, and at times seems eager to die for the cause of burying her brother. “I have longer to please the dead than please the living herein the kingdom down below I'll lie forever.” (line 90) Antigone believes the burial rituals are the unwritten rules of the gods, and must be obeyed regardless of a ruler's political whims.
In Kohlbergs moral stages five & six people begin to understand morals and social good then moral reasoning. Basic human rights become important as well as principles.
... seems to suggest that morality must or will be compromised. For Sophocles, morality helps to reinforce order, but on a cosmic, and in many ways absurd, level. Creon is forced to submit to the laws of jealous, fickle, inconstant gods. Antigone is the only advocate for the god's place in judgement over mankind and her reward is an untimely death. This "order" is beyond human comprehension. Both plays leave a reader or audience morally unsettled. We find Creon morally culpable but are left uneasy by the order established at the conclusion. Perhaps this unsettling effect was at least part of the playwrights' ultimate goal.
Kohlberg’s theory of the stages of moral development has gained some popularity despite being controversial. The claim that the levels form a “ladder,” the bottom being the immature child with a pre-conventional level and the top being a post conventional ethical individual. The sequence is unvarying and the subject must begin at the bottom with aspirations to reach the top, possibly doing so. (7) Research confirms that individuals from different cultures actually progress according to Kohlbergs theory, at least to the conventional level. Kohlberg’s stages of moral development continue to provide a foundation for psychology studies of moral reasoning. (6)