Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay about story telling
An essay about story telling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay about story telling
Anthropic Paradox
The Blast Off was lined with photos of rockets charging into space. George settled into the bar stool, took a drink and put the glass down. Joe recognized this as the preparations prior to the start of a story and hoped he had heard it only a few times before.
A stranger appeared next to George and asked, "May I purchase a drink please?"
"Sure, bourbon OK?" Joe asked.
"That would be fine. Is this sufficient?" He reached into a pocket and dropped a dollar coin on the bar. It bounced a few times and Joe slapped his hand down to keep it from rolling off the bar. "Hope I didn't damage the wood."
George started, "Don't worry about hurting this bar. It's rock maple, hardest wood known. Why back in the early days we were even thinking of using this as a heat shield on the early Mercury test flights. But somebody's cousin had some political connections so..."
"Not quite." Joe interrupted glanced at George than added, "Tell you what. You tell us a story we haven't heard and the drinks are free. For as long as you keep talking."
"Thanks. I accept your proposition. My name is Carpenter. I bought this property but I can't develop it. Turns out there are residents and I can't get rid of them."
"This is Florida, every landlord tells story."
Carpenter looked from the bartender to George then at the walls covered in photos of rockets and stars and galaxies. "How about the truth?"
The Joe poured a drink but kept his hand on the glass. "All stories told in a bar are true. Keep going."
"I'm not from around here. Not Florida, not even the USA." His eyes focused on the glass and he licked his lips but Joe kept his hand on it. "Not even this planet, not even this universe."
Joe's grip on the glass loosened.
"I bought ...
... middle of paper ...
...o hard to travel in is inconsistent. Pour us both a drink, on me."
Joe started pouring the drinks. " His story does neatly explain both Fermi's Paradox and the anthropic principle and why didn't he know where the exit was?"
"Two drinks, downed fast, strange bar. It's easy to get confused. Don't tell me that you of all people are starting to believe what you hear in this bar."
Joe lifted the bar rag and slid George's drink over. It caught on something and spilled down George's pants. Both men stared at the rock maple bar top. The drink had snagged on an impression in the bar. It was an eighth inch deep and matched the form of the locket.
The two friends looked at each other.
"It makes you wonder if humans are the residents he was talking about," George said. He relaxed in the bar stool. "You know they tried to evict me once. I was young, right out of college..."
“We almost had it made, huh Lennie?” George said in a somber tone. Lennie gave him nothing but a blank stare in response. “It’s all that damn tramp’s fault,” George hissed between sips. “If she hadn’t been going around lookin’ for trouble, none of this would have
“If only ya’ had listen’d” George whispered as tears swelled in his eyes. Slim looked away and shouted at an elderly man who worked at the bar and was cleaning down tables. “Two whiskey’s please.”
"I bet you all have a lot of barefoot, pregnant people there don't you?" he asks with a discriminating smile.
“Let’s go”, Steve said as he motioned to the pub. They followed him in and were ready for everything....
"This is an island. At least I think it's and island. That's a reef out in the sea. Perhaps there are not any grownups anywhere."
It is thought that Meno's paradox is of critical importance both within Plato's thought and within the whole history of ideas. It's major importance is that for the first time on record, the possibility of achieving knowledge from the mind's own resources rather than from experience is articulated, demonstrated and seen as raising important philosophical questions.
In the early 1970s, Brandon Carter stated what he called "the anthropic principle": that what we can expect to observe "must be restricted by the conditions necessary for our presence as observers" (Leslie ed. 1990). Carter’s word "anthropic" was intended as applying to intelligent beings in general. The "weak" version of his principle covered the spatiotemporal districts in which observers found themselves, while its "strong" version covered their universes, but the distinction between spatiotemporal districts and universes, and hence between the weak principle and the strong, could not always be made firmly: one writer’s "universe" could sometimes be another’s "gigantic district". Moreover, the necessity involved was never -- not even in the case of the "strong anthropic principle" -- a matter of saying that some factor, for instance God, had made our universe utterly fated to be intelligent-life-permitting, let alone intelligent-life-containing. However, all these points have often been misunderstood and, at least when it comes to stating what words mean, errors regularly repeated can cease to be errors. Has Carter therefore lost all right to determine what "anthropic principle" and "strong anthropic principle" really mean? No, he has not, for his suggestion that observership’s prerequisites might set up observational selection effects is of such importance. Remember, it could throw light on any observed fine tuning without introducing God. Everything is thrust into confusion when people say that belief in God "is supported by the anthropic principle", meaning simply that they believe in fine tuning and think God can explain it. As enunciated by Carter , the anthropic principle does not so much as mention fine tuning.
In Life of the Cosmos, Lee Smolin’s main criticism for the Weak Anthropic Principle is that it does not give a prediction that can be falsified by observation. Smolin applies this same criticism toward its postulates and asserts cosmological natural selection as a superior concept (Smolin 203-204). My paper will explain Smolin’s criticism toward the Anthropic Principle and its postulates while comparing them to cosmological natural selection. I will then argue that Smolin’s criticism of the Anthropic Principle is valid but misleading and his assertion of cosmological natural selection is only better scientifically; not in application.
“You don’t know me.” My voice sounded as unsteady as his stance. He shrugged as he chuckled; the laughter turned my blood cold. He seemed to know something I did not.
“Oh that?” someone said calmly. “That’s Warren, our founder, supervisor, and show-off of the entire Sanctuary. They’re just grabbing supplies for some of the residents since shipping isn’t working
“Ready for take off?” Caleb yelled above the loud roaring engines of the rocket. “Yes!” we all shouted. “3,2,1” and we took off.
Iris raised her eyebrows at me before returning to her little room, and I grabbed the thirty dollars off the counter, putting it in the cash register. "I'm gonna head home now, okay?" "Mm-hm, do you need a
"Hey, did you do it?" he asked. "Yes, and I expect to be paid in full."
“We should leave. I think one of the bartenders is falling in love with you,” I said.