Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The comparative annotated bibliography sample
Annotated bibliography
Annotated bibliography papers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The comparative annotated bibliography sample
Annotation Bibliography - Innovation Leadership
Innovation is a process of translating an idea or invention for new goods or services that create value. The innovative leaders are creative visionaries have huge ideas and motivate people around them to turn an idea into reality. If an organization incorporates some innovation into the realm of a head in a small business, there is a chance of continuous growth. To achieve imagination and communication, leaders must have confidence in self to make effective communication and imagination. Innovative leaders can be team leaders, managers, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and other individuals who manage projects and people. The bibliographies provide an explanation how leadership and innovation displayed
…show more content…
Employees and leaders expected to collaborate in teams and create environments that drive and support innovation. The study aimed to explore whether information and connection power distinct with other sources, such as referent, coercive, reward and expert. The first research objective investigated whether information power and connection power were empirically distinct emerging and potentially unique sources of power. The second objective explored whether referent, legitimate, coercive, information, reward, and connection fell under the two categories (formal and informal power). The third goal determined which form of authority associated with an innovative culture. A survey questionnaire used to collect data from 160 employees using 28 items included in the factor analysis (Norbom & Lopez, 2016). As a result, this article is useful for leaders to use their formal power to drive goals further by enlisting the help of others with informal power. Avoid challenging the informal power that does not have an adverse impact on an organization or …show more content…
Transactional leadership styles can gain from an organization who has a desire to implement changes to be successful in innovation. The study is to analyze between transformational, laissez-faire and transactional leadership. The results of the evaluation determined which style was more feasible for the preparation of an organization. Transactional and transformational leaderships are styles of active leaders while laisse-faire leadership style is passive leaders. Transformational leadership is one the important determinant in an organizational innovation and manager promotes healthy innovation
Borkowski (2015) distinguished between transactional leadership and transformational leadership by explaining that: transactional leadership is directed toward task accomplishment and the maintenance of good relations between the leader and subordinates throw consideration of performance and reward. And, Transformational leadership, contrasting transactional leadership, is directed toward the influence and management of institutional change and innovation through revitalization and
There are four more attributes added to the transactional leadership theory and forms the transformational theory. Basically, it is the process where the leader and follower raises their hand for each other towards a greater benefit (Dems, 2015). This type of leadership style is very energetic, enthusiastic and passionate and it’s not confined in a hierarchical relation. Here leader exposed the clear goal to the follower and having a high expectation. But he never forgets about his follower to help them, encourage the. Leader shares his opinion and welcome every input from group members (Transformational Leadership, 2015) . The four qualities are intellectual stimulation to followers to explore new ideas. Considering each individual despite only group or team. Inspirational motivation for creating an inspiring vision to the group which is really achievable. Most important thing the behavior of transformational leader is being a role model to follow (Dawes,
Tost, L., Gino, F., & Larrick, R. P. (2013). When power makes others speechless: the negative impact of leader power on team performance. Academy Of Management Journal, 56(5), 1465-1486. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0180
Vecchio, R. (Ed.). (2007). Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Whether or not a company is attains acclaimed success lies not in the fact that it spends huge amounts of money on Research and Development, rather, and as stated by Bauer and Erdogan (2010), success is determined principally by the people within hat specific organization; they are the assets whose output resonates wit he company’s success. However, while this is an established fact, it is also important to state that both the organization and the people who constitute it mutual impact arriving at collective success. Therefore, as Bauer & Erdogan (2010) continue to assert, it is necessary to understand how people relate at work both at the individual and group levels, and how the organization is impacted by this interrelationship. This is what Bauer & Erdogan (2010), define as organizational behavior. It informs on what is wrong, and what is correct; essentially assisting one as an employee become ore engaged in work. Leadership or governance is one of the constituent components of organizational behavior. More often than not, it is usually associated with power, ethos, and cultural inclinations of the organization. This paper seeks to examine in-depth, management problems associated with leadership and governance at Hewlett-Packard and how it impacts on the company’s organizational culture and behavior.
The literature generally suggests that effective leaders express their needs and motives in ways that benefit the organization. These needs or motives, are considered to be; tenacity, power, drive and work ethic (DuBrin et al. 2006). The power motive is significant, as it plays a major role in the relations taking place within the organization. Power over others is an inevitable part of leadership, but it also carries with it the risks associated with the misuse or abuse of power (Wikipedia, 2008).
“Leadership is an influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes that reflect their mutual purposes” (Rost, 1931). But in today’s time, the styles of leadership are changed every time a new technology is invented or discovered so there is lack of persistency. The only thing which manages to stay constant is the principles of carrying out business activities. There are philosophies and ideologies on leadership which can be used in any time period as they are mostly a reflection of the principles of leadership. Theorists and authors like Hobbes (1679), Lewin (1947) and Aristotle (384–322 B.C.), in their time have produced enough material which can be put into use by modern day leaders and managers. Philosophers like Aristotle, who was known to be one of the most business-oriented and practical philosopher of his time, his work is still used by businesses today because of their relevance as he is interested in defining principles in terms of the ethics of leadership (Santa Clara University). In the essay I have tried to show how leadership has adapted to the changes around them and compared to the past and what circumstances caused need to change it. As a layman, anyone would think that the principles centuries ago will be very different to what we follow now but after studying on Hobbes, Lewin and Aristotle it has made a big impact on my way of thinking because the work produced by them still has more relevance compared to some of the work produced now. I have tried to explain the evolvement of leadership through three aspects which are psychology, sociology and philosophy.
Unfortunately, being inspiring to employees is not enough. These situations occur when employees face challenges in accomplishing goals. In such situations, a leader needs to exercise power and influence to push forth the desired goals. While the course identified five sources of power, I believe only three should be considered for an effective leader. The first is legitimate power (6), which is often considered the first source of power in the organizations I have worked in. The source of power comes...
Certainly, an army would not be able to battle in the war without a commander who in charges of the whole strategy. Correspondingly, any organisations cannot function without leaders. Leader is the most substantial element of successful organizations. Becoming outstanding leaders, leadership skill is vital in order to drive the organizations forward. Several leadership principles are extensively used these days. Burns (1978) identified two types of leadership comprise of transactional and transformational leadership. Hence, leaders should be capable to indicate which theory should be applied in accordance with organization’s culture and objectives. This essay aims to evaluate the resemblances and the differences between transactional and transformational leadership as well as the feasibility to utilize a mixture of them by giving the definitions and examples followed by the supporting researches and studies.
Organizations are groups of people with a purpose. These people may have differences in beliefs, perceptions of reality and values. Resources within organizations are usually scarce which can lead to conflict. Those with power play a critical role in allocating those resources and influencing others in the organization. How much influence an individual may have will be greatly determined by their structural and interpersonal power. In this essay, I will discuss the expert power of three individuals that I know personally: Chris Tierney, a small business owner, David Levy, a neurologist and author and Dr. Richard L. Lieber, a research scientist. The discussion will focus on whether, in these examples, expert power alone is enough to drive one’s success.
Power is the ability to obtain, retain, and motivate people and to organize informational and material resources to accomplish a task( Leadership, n.d). Power is central to the leadership process in the development of a manager’s self-confidence and willingness to support staff members ( Schmidt & Wilkinson, 1990). The desire for power is universal. From this vantage point, power should be accepted as a natural part of any individual organization. Power is not evenly distributed among individuals or groups, but every individual has some degree of power.
Horth, D., & Buchner, D. (2009). Innovation Leadership. Retrieved from Center for Creative Leadership: http://www.ccl.org/leadership/pdf/research/InnovationLeadership.pdf
The main objective of writing this paper is in practice, the management of innovative process takes into account the most important criteria that reflect the substance of innovation and arising directly from the definition of "disruptive innovation". Such criteria include the degree of novelty and substantive content.
Leadership is meant to create a system to lessen chaos and create order, as well as to improve individuals and teams. The article discusses three leadership styles, which include transformational, contingent reward, and laissez-faire. Transformational leadership is considered active command and uses confidence-building to encourage any followers to rethink and reframe the future to create a positive outlook. Contingent reward leadership, another active leadership, focuses on transparent exchanges and contracts to convey to the followers what is expected of them and what their reward will be once the goal is achieved; however, unlike with transformational leadership, the leader focuses much less on the human resources side of the equation and
Because of this fact most organizations and entrepreneurs are paying close attention the the leaders they put in place to lead their company and its people into victory, which is the ultimate goal of their organizations. It is a well known fact that leadership is an important factor in an organization’s success, but the type of leadership style and as well as the leader 's personality is what really determines that level of success. In my research I have concluded that the most important leadership styles are transformational and transactional leadership. Transformational leadership has the potential to resurrect, transform and keep companies evolving with time. Transactional leadership although can have some negative effects on some, but if used properly, can promote compliance almost a stagnant team through both rewards and punishments. When companies are pursuing leaders, they not only look at their candidates experiences knowledge of a particular sector of that business, but they pay close attention to the personalities of these individual. They do so because they know that one’s leadership style and abilities is heavily affected by the candidates own personality and views. As a result of this thinking, it has lead all authors involved in both research paper and article “Relationship Between Leaders Personality Types and Source of Power and leadership Styles Among Managers” and “