Animal Rights Research Paper

Animal rights

Introduction

In science, humans are also referred to as animals. Therefore, in this analysis, it is important to note that the animal discussed is non-human animals. In a moral system, one would be confused on where to place animals. As a result of this confusion, there are some people who regard them from a viewpoint of a high moral status, while others deny them the same. Animal rights represent the notion that animals have the right to be alive and to be accorded with the basic things in life. This does not mean that they should receive the privileges that humans do. An example of these basic requirements is the need to avoid suffering. In this paper, animal rights have been discussed, from an ethical perspective, to show that

Equality is not an assertion of fact, which can be scrubbed when further discoveries are made on the nature of the involved parties. Instead consideration in a manner that favors equality is a philosophical prescription. For example, philosophy dictates that both human sees should be treated equally (Acred 98). This is a dictation that is not subject to any scientific research and discoveries. However, if it was based on the ability of the individual to use physical strength, men would be considered superior to women. In the same way if it was based on intelligence, if discoveries proved that the intelligence of both sees were different, there would be no equality. Morality is not to be confused with ability. Moral qualities are independent on the ability of the individual to live without them. They are values that have to be voluntary and out of goodwill. They are caused by the general desire to do what is best for everybody. Therefore, intelligence, moral capacity and such other factors cannot be put into consideration, when analyzing

As a matter of fact veterinarians were told to ignore the pan that they sensed in animals. This happened in the US, in 1989. This means that there were some veterinary hospitals that did not see the need to use analgesics in a bid to reduce and control the pain in animals. This caused scientists to embark on a special mission to establish whether animals feel pain. With advancement in technology it was easier to conduct this research, which was followed by many scientific publications. According to them, animals possess the ability to feel pain, as well as suffer. Although they may not share the anticipation that humans do before injury, they sure experience the pain after the injury. Also the research shows that animals have the ability to remember suffering. With this in mind, it is clear that animals have an existential need to avoid pain and suffering. From the argument that had been presented by Descartes, the only reason as to why he did not approve of animal rights was the fact that they did not have the ability to feel pain (Coster 36). Long after he was gone, it was established that they can suffer and feel pain. This makes Descartes an automatic supporter of animal rights, except that he did not live enough to know it. According to ethics, animal rights should be respected and adhered to, by anyone who understands