Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negatives of technology on social interactions
Negatives of technology on social interactions
Impact of technology on social interaction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negatives of technology on social interactions
The article “Society is dead, we have retreated into the iWorld” by Andrew Sullivan is a persuasive and explanatory piece in which he expresses his observations and concerns about the use of technology, especially iPods, as a mechanism of isolation from the rest of the world. Sullivan argues that people are constantly allowing their lives to become narrowed by the excessive use of their iPods while shutting out everyone and everything else. He uses evidence and several examples, including ones from his personal experience, in an attempt to support his claims. Sullivan is quite clever in his organization of the piece, and his style impressively encompasses descriptive language, figurative language and strong diction, but he still makes a few …show more content…
flawed statements. Sullivan deftly begins his article with a few statements about his experience and thoughts while visiting New York City. He uses these as a way to successfully capture the attention of his readers, instead, of instantly stating his views on technology and iPods. Perhaps, if he had opened the article by directly addressing his issue with iPods, it may have made some readers hesitant about reading the entire article because they enjoy the daily use of their iPods. Pertaining to the changed atmosphere in New York, he states, “that insane mishmash of yells, chatter, clatter, hustle and chutzpah that makes New York the urban equivalent of methamphetamine” (1) is quieter. This eerie silence in New York was unfamiliar to him, and he attributes it to “little white wires hanging down” from the ears of individuals around him “or tucked into [their] pockets, purses or jackets” (1). Sullivan attempts to prove his point by admitting that he is also guilty of isolating himself from society by the constant overuse of his iPod. He then goes as far as referring to individuals possessing and using an iPod as being a part of a cult when he states, “I joined the cult a few years ago: the sect of little white box worshippers” (1). Although this is an opinionated piece, Sullivan should have been more careful in his diction. It is possible for his readers to be highly offended by his reference to them belonging to a cult, thus leaving them too indignant to want to continue reading the rest of his piece. Perhaps, he could’ve chosen a more suitable word than cult such as “group” or “organization,” and his point would be conveyed nonetheless. Sullivan strategically structures his piece with a mixture of short paragraphs and short sentences. There is no paragraph composed of more than six lines and there are even sentences which stand alone. This organizational technique mimics the individuals of society who walk around in their own little bubble in isolation from the rest of the world. The sentences that stand-alone serve to depict an individual strolling around with their headphones on or earbuds in to block out everything else. Sullivan uses figurative language such as an analogy and a simile. He uses an analogy to demonstrate his point of the prevalence of apple products, even at ministerial establishments such as churches, to his audience. He figuratively analogizes the churches to an Apple store by stating that he attends church every now and then and describes the churches as huge luminous Apple stores containing pews in the back. Also, he compares the priests who listen to confessions and offer support, to clerics in their monostatic uniforms all bustling around or sitting behind the “Genius bars”. Additionally, he uses a simile to describe the pace at which human beings stroll around in the world “like hermit crabs with our isolation surgically attached” (2). Sullivan writes the first five paragraphs of the piece in narrative form and recounts his personal experience on a trip to New York as he comments on the behavior of people that were around him.
From paragraphs six to ten, he switches from talking about others and comments on his own behavior and how he himself became obsessed with his iPod as he begins by saying, “Yes, I might as well own up. I’m one of them” (1). Next, in paragraphs eleven to thirteen, he provides a general and brief comment about the prevalence of apple products throughout America and how the use of these products is causing Americans to narrow their lives. He proceeds by switching to a more personal approach by occasionally using the words “you” and “your” to directly refer to the iPod users from paragraphs fourteen to twenty-one. Following this direct approach, Sullivan moves to an all-inclusive approach which includes himself and the individuals around him as he comments on their reason for isolating themselves through the use of their iPod. And finally, in the last two lines he goes back to the narrative form where he recounts the one time he forgot his iPod and had no other choice but to regain consciousness and begin to recognize and become a part of the real world again. That one mis happening caused him to pop his isolation bubble and pay attention to various activities and sounds around him. He ends by urging others to leave their iPod behind and to “try it” as the world has its own “soundtrack”. This approach used by Sullivan was effective as it included everyone. He didn’t just criticize others around him but was honest enough to admit his own faults and guilt. It shows his audience that his purpose is not to provide a biased criticism of their actions, instead, he is trying to reason with
them. Sullivan carefully constructs his explanatory and persuasive piece ensuring that he vividly conveys each of his points. He manipulates syntax for a stylistic effect to create cohesion throughout the piece. In addition, he successfully drives home the realization/ new understanding of the effects of iPod in the daily activities of individuals. Also, in his closing he brings closure to his piece by blending modes of writing to affect his audience and successfully accomplish his purpose.
While his best arguments come from cultural criticism. Written text led to the decline of oral reading and television obliterated the radio. Every technology comes with it’s trade-offs, it just comes down to moderation. There is little doubt that the internet is changing our brain. What Carr neglects to mention, however, is how the internet can change our brain for the better. Computer games have the ability to improve cognitive tasks and increase visual attention. He doesn’t always address the good effects that the internet has had on the world. One of the better strategies Carr uses is switching his point of view from third to first person. He reflects on his personal life and how his life has changed in response to what he has learned. Carr shows how even he has his faults but, being aware of a problem is the first step to finding
Doctor Jean Twenge is an American psychologist who published an article for The Atlantic titled “Has the Smartphone Destroyed a Generation?” in September 2017. The purpose of Twenge’s article is to emphasize the growing burden of smartphones in our current society. She argues that teenagers are completely relying on smartphones in order to have a social life which in return is crippling their generation. Twenge effectively uses rhetorical devices in order to draw attention to the impact of smartphones on a specific generation.
Thesis: Twenge affectively uses emotional appeals to persuade her readers into believing that the excessive use of smartphone has ruined a generation.
...helle Hackman, a sophomore in high school, realized that her friends, rather than engaging in a conversation, were “more inclined to text each other” (Huffington Post). Michelle also became aware that over forty percent of people were suffering from anxiety when they were separated from the phones. This clearly shows that we are connected to the technology that we use, but we are also suffering from the use of technology. We spend more than half of our entire day using some sort of technology, whether that is a computer, phone, television, or radio. Technology is becoming a prevalent part of our lives, and we cannot live without it. Technology has become our family, and part of us.
The author attempts to build a focus around the importance preserving our mind, he writes, “But it’s a different kind of reading, and behind it lies a different kind of thinking—perhaps a new sense of the self. ‘We are not what we read…. We are how we read’ (395). Provided that Carr focuses on the safeguarding of our minds his intentions are to appeal into an individual’s emotion and bring them to the conclusion that if we continue to let the internet distract us we will lose our self’s. He recognizes that when speaking of an individual’s self they are mindfully more open to accepting what you tell them and he uses this as another one of his writing strategies. Nicholas Carr writes, “As we are drained of our ‘inner repertory of dense cultural inheritance,’ Foreman concluded, we risk turning into ‘pancake people—spread wide and thin as we connect with that vast network of information accessed by the mere touch of a button.”’ (399) by adding this statement within the essay, he is drastically appealing to a reader’s emotion. The conclusion drawn from this claim triggers the reader’s need to defend their identity consequently these emotions triggered by possibilities help the reader give into the authors argument. The author appeals to the audience’s emotion by encompassing their sense of true self and
Together they work together as a whole in order to persuade his audience of those involved in technology. Carr uses these strategies in order to back up his information and validate his point. Carr begins by using pathos by stating an anecdote from the movie A Space Odyssey, then he uses logos by stating factual evidence and statistics, lastly Carr uses ethos by stating appropriate vocabulary and conceding to opposition. Throughout the article Carr compares the past and present and how the Internet has changed not only himself, but also people. In order to show his credibility, Carr uses research and examples of other credible writers who have the same beliefs as he does on the Internet. Due to the article being lengthy in text we are able to assume that Carr does that on purpose in order to validate his point that the Internet is affecting our mind as it shortens our attention span and ability to think creatively. The purpose of the excerpt is to persuade his audience of those involved in technology that people in the society today are unable to have complete focus on a longer text due to the Internet causing us to artificial intelligence. For this purpose, Carr develops an influential tone for his audience
Trying to reflect the fears instilled in himself through comparison to an unrealistic movie. I believe that the internet hasn’t changed everyone’s the way the he says its changed his. I think that people who were born into the world of technology have the ability to analyze into a deeper thought what is needed and skim for instant answer when it’s not needed. On the other side those whom have been forced to adapt to it, such as Carr, find themselves losing abilities they once relied on because they were taught growing up to do both things. Now that the internet has forced them to adapt to it, they can’t focus of doing both types of thinking. The complexity of our minds is deep and that can’t be made shallow by the ability to get instant gratification of information. We simply begin to rule out unimportant things, once the important thing is found then it can be analyzed. Although Carr says his mind isn’t going as far as it used to, clearly that’s exactly what he did in this essay. He used the older “traditional way” of over-analyzing unnecessary things to reach a point that ends up being moot. Clearly, his use of logos, ethos and pathos, although present were not enough to prove his opinion to be
In “Connectivity and its Discontents,” Sherry Turkle discusses how often we are found on our technology. Turkle states in her thesis “Technology makes it easy to communicate when we wish and to disengage at will.” In the essay are interviews on several different people, of all ages to get their view on the 21st century. Teens are starting to rely on “robot friendships,” the most communication teens get are from their phones. Are we so busy trying to connect to the media that we are often forgetting what is happening around us?
By using rhetorical questions such as the one previously stated as well as, “More importantly, why do so many people no longer consider the physical world worth watching?” This continues to reinforce his use of the guilty tone to make readers reflect on how technology is replacing nature.
I’m scrolling through the articles on Snapchat and find my way across one with an intriguing title, I instantly tap on it. I begin to scroll further down only to find myself going through extensive paragraphs of information and suddenly this article that seemed so interesting became a bore. In Nicholas G. Carr’s novel, The Shallows, he argues the internet is creating more problems to us humans than actual benefits. Our social skills are starting to lack and our interaction with technology is beginning to heighten. Humans contemplative skills are slowly fading away due to our reliance on the internet to solve our problems. Technology is inevitable by humans, seeing that individuals use it in their everyday lives. Unfortunately, this is a problem considering the use of high-tech gadgets decrease in one’s capacity for concentration, contemplation, and personal memory.
Carr writes “Your new phone, like your old one will become your constant companion and trusty factorum- your teacher, secretary, confessor, guru.” This example says that smartphone have become a persons best friend, and they steer us away from interaction with actual people. Carr also writes “We need to give our minds more room to think.” This example is saying that we constantly rely on our smartphones and that we need to change that and allow our minds to do work on their own. Lastly Carr writes “We love our phones for good reasons.”
Turkle argues that technology has fundamentally changed how people view themselves and their lives (271). She reports that, “BlackBerry users describe that sense of encroachment of the device on their time. One says, ‘I don’t have enough time alone with my mind’; another, ‘I artificially make time to think…’” (274). Her point is that people have to make a deliberate choice to disconnect, to exist in their own mind rather than the virtual world (Turkle 274). Another point Turkle brings up is that in this technologic age children are not learning to be self- reliant. Without having the experience of being truly alone and making their own decisions, children are not developing the skills they once did (Turkle 274). As Turkle reports, “There used to be a moment in the life of an urban child, usually between 12 and 14, when there was a first time to navigate the city alone. It was a rite of passage that communicated, ‘you are on your own and responsible.
Technology has always been at the forefront of the world’s mind, for as long as anyone can remember. The idea of “advancing” has been a consistent goal among developers. However, recently the invention of smartphones broke out into the world of technology, causing millions of people to become encapsulated in a world of knowledge at their fingertips. Jean Twenge elaborates on the impacts of the smartphone on the younger generation in her article “Has the Smartphone Destroyed a Generation?” Twenge’s article is just a sliver of the analysis that she presents in her book “IGen.” Twenge, a professor of psychology at San
“Technology is supposed to make our lives easier, allowing us to do things more quickly and efficiently. But too often it seems to make things harder, leaving us with fifty-button remote controls, digital cameras with hundreds of mysterious features.” (James Surowiecki) Whether or not is known, technology has become too heavily relied on. It is replacing important social factors such as, life skills and communication skills. While technology is created to be beneficial, there must be a point in time where we draw the line. Once face-to-face conversations begin to extinguish, this means that there is too much focus on the “screen culture”. In her writing, “Alone Together”, Sherry Turkle talks
Consider a situation where a family is sitting at the dining table, the son pull out his iPhone, connects to Wi-Fi, and starts chatting with his friends on “Facebook”. The father has a Samsung Galaxy S4 in his hands and he is reading the newspaper online and using “Whatsapp” messenger while having his meal. The mother is busy texting her friends. They are all “socializing” but none of them has spoken as much as a single word to each other. This situation can be commonly seen nowadays. Technology has brought us closer and squeezed the distances but in reality, it has taken us away from each other. The rapid growth of technology has brought about significant changes in human lives, especially in their relationships. The latest technologies have turned this world into a “global village” but the way humans interact with each other, the types of relations and their importance has changed a lot. The advancement in technology has brought us close but has also taken us apart.