Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the gangster genre
The aspects of cinematography
Essay on the gangster genre
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Andrew Sarris’ framework for being an auteur has requirements which include technical competence, having a distinguishable personality that appears in ones films as well as an interior meaning, which described as tension between the filmmakers personality and his/her work. Martin Scorsese, as applied to Sarris’ explanation can be studied as an auteur because of his immense technical know-how as well as his experience; Scorsese has a signature style which includes gritty, violent filmmaking, use of recurring actors and well placed music as well as showing his villains in a likeable way appears to be his interior meaning. For research I screened the films The Departed, GoodFellas, and Gangs of New York. In viewing his three films the elements …show more content…
This film clearly had strong male leads, violence, and moments of comedy all in one coherent piece. There is a scene which has Jack Nicholson’s character by the name of “Frank” having a conversation with “Will” played by Leonardo Di Caprio, about the possibility of their being a rat or snitch in the group, as Nicholson’s character is saying those lines he mimics a rat gnawing, as serious and tense of a situation that scene was, humor made it more tense by showcasing the insanity within “Frank”. This particular shot encapsulates Scorsese’s playful aesthetic and vibe which is in all of his movies. In making this films antagonist such a strong presence Scorsese finds a way to kill him justly by being shot multiple times, a choice he has made with many others in his films. In that same scene Nicholson’s character basically dead fires a last shot and then, is again shot, this is what I meant by a playful aesthetic, Scorsese had to include a little bit of humor. His films have memorable villains and all seem to meet a fitting end; elements of grittiness and a pretty intense amount of violence, as well as a sort of admiration to the intelligence and fearlessness of the characters were showcased in this particular …show more content…
GoodFellas again has this balance of likeable yet violent and humorous quality to its characters, which is a definite trademark of Scorsese. This film shows gangsters and the acts they commit while being part of a mob family. In this particular film the presence of a preferred working relationship was evident by casting Robert De Niro having worked with Scorsese since the 70’s and Joe Pesci, who was previously on the film Raging Bull. Authenticity is a possible factor being De Niro and Pesci and their characters are Italian but it is more than that, these actors are able to incorporate so much into their roles as evident by the wonderful performances; Scorsese knew that and had trust in their ability to elevate what was on the script into a work of art. One scene that has that Scorsese style has Pesci’s character “Tommy” complaining about getting blood on his shoes after stomping a man to death in a little bar, as morbid as it is it the obliviousness that his character showed carries a black comedy element to it, a motif all too well seen in his films. Growing up catholic seemed to influence his works and in this movie that remains true. In GoodFellas religion is spoken of in quite a few scenes, one in particular Ray Liotta’s character “Henry Hill” is talking to a possible girlfriend’s mother and she asks if he is Jewish; he replies “only the good half”. Those familiar with Scorsese’s work know
In the film industry, there are directors who merely take someone else’s vision and express it in their own way on film, then there are those who take their own visions and use any means necessary to express their visions on film. The latter of these two types of directors are called auteurs. Not only do auteurs write the scripts from elements that they know and love in life, but they direct, produce, and sometimes act in their films as well. Three prime examples of these auteurs are: Kevin Smith, Spike Lee and Alfred Hitchcock.
The auteur theory is a view on filmmaking that consists of three equally important premises: technical competence, interior meaning, and personal signature of the director. Auteur is a French word for author. The auteur theory was developed by Andrew Sarris, a well-known American film critic. Technical competence of the Auteur deals with how the director films the movie in their own style. Personal signature includes recurring themes that are present within the director’s line of work with characteristics of style, which serve as a signature. The third and ultimate premise of the Auteur theory is the interior meaning which is basically the main theme behind the film.
The gangster genre within films in America has accomplished numerous positive criticisms and constant willing audiences due to containing outstanding spectacles and mind-blowing action. The Godfather, being second on the IMDb Top 250 Movies, has set a new popular concept to life within the Mafia from their point of view. Doing so, creating a positive association. Yet within Italy, the same topic contains a complete different view. Movies such as I Cento Passi demonstrate unenthusiastic view by those whom are outside yet negatively affected by those members. Unlike American films, the gangsters are not as often viewed at the protagonist and are the main causes for the problematic events. But how different is Italian Mafia and American Mafia in cinema?
...s we are given. Some displayed right on the screen, others shown through actors’ gestures. At the same time this film keeps us entertained with action and violence current the interested of the present generation. This shows “American Gangster” was made with the audience in mind and this is why it did so well in the box office. This film really does such a quality job of capturing the time period, but it still had all these other elements in it to try to make it perfect. “A perfect cast”, that become their character and still brings their own personification into the film. Setting that can not confuse you, as well as narrative economy that still again remind you were you are. Editing that flows nice and evenly. But is this all the makes for a perfect film or just a jack-of-all-trades, master of none. Are all these qualities too much and really their downfall?
Think about your favorite movie. When watching that movie, was there anything about the style of the movie that makes it your favorite? Have you ever thought about why that movie is just so darn good? The answer is because of the the Auteur. An Auteur is the artists behind the movie. They have and individual style and control over all elements of production, which make their movies exclusively unique. If you could put a finger on who the director of a movie is without even seeing the whole film, then the person that made the movie is most likely an auteur director. They have a unique stamp on each of their movies. This essay will be covering Martin Scorsese, you will soon find out that he is one of the best auteur directors in the film industry. This paper will include, but is not limited to two of his movies, Good Fellas, and The Wolf of Wall Street. We will also cover the details on what makes Martin Scorsese's movies unique, such as the common themes, recurring motifs, and filming practices found in their work. Then on
With the help of superb editing, sound, mise en scene, and cinematography, this film cannot be topped. The fist scene of the movie creates an atmosphere that helps the viewer know that he/she will enjoy this wonderful classic. Throughout the movie there are surprises and fun that makes this a movie that people will want to watch again and again. Gene Kelly said it best when he said, "Dignity, always dignity. " That is what this movie has from beginning to end, dignity.
Connelly, Marie. "The films of Martin Scorsese: A critical study." Diss. Case Western Reserve University, 1991. Web. 07 Apr 2014.
The Analysis of Quentin Tarantino as a Director The director I have chosen to look at is Quentin Tarantino. His films have achieved a cult ang global status and I dont think anyone is going to argue that he is not an auteur. I am more interested in examining his style and seeing how this makes him an auteur and if it has changed when he was receiving a higher budget. Tarantino was born in Noxville Tennessee on 27th march 1963. Tony
After Scorsese’s father asking him a question about a character, a young Martin raised his fingers to make an impression of him shooting a gun. This image is one of the most memorable images in Scorsese’s film Taxi Driver, where we see Robert De Niro repeating the same image pointing to his temples. This image is shown at the height of the film. When Scorsese got a television at home, no more did he have to leave his house to engross himself in the most recent movie best seller. Already we can see Scorsese’s love of filmmaking from an extremely young
The Godfather is most notably one of the most prolific films of its time. This "gangster" film displayed many transformations of permeating color to give the viewer observable cues in its mise en scene that drew one right into the movie. The dramatic acting set the tone of the film with a score that lifted the viewer right out of their seat in many scenes. The directing and cinematography made The Godfather ahead of its time. The nostalgic feel of family importance and the danger of revenge lets us into the life of the Mafia. Even though no other techniques would have given the viewer a feeling of inside the mob like the mise en scene of the power the godfather held, the characters are reinforced literally and figuratively because the story views the Mafia from the inside out, and the cinematography of the film gives it a dangerous and nostalgic feel.
Take the dynamic hit men duo of Vincent Vega and Jules Winnfield played by John Travolta and the bold Samuel L. Jackson, respectively. In any other movie these two anti-heroes would be reviled, but this is not any other movie. This is Pulp Fiction where there are no black and white characters, but only gray shades of right, wrong, and the perpetual duel between the two. The pitch perfect performances by all the actors and actresses involved help lend these devious characters a certain sincerity they otherwise would lack, and in turn the audience begins to feel a bizzare sort of affection for them. These brilliant performances anchor the film, and help it become a true tour de force of
“Entertainment has to come hand in hand with a little bit of medicine, some people go to the movies to be reminded that everything’s okay. I don’t make those kinds of movies. That, to me, is a lie. Everything’s not okay.” - David Fincher. David Fincher is the director that I am choosing to homage for a number of reasons. I personally find his movies to be some of the deepest, most well made, and beautiful films in recent memory. However it is Fincher’s take on story telling and filmmaking in general that causes me to admire his films so much. This quote exemplifies that, and is something that I whole-heartedly agree with. I am and have always been extremely opinionated and open about my views on the world and I believe that artists have a responsibility to do what they can with their art to help improve the culture that they are helping to create. In this paper I will try to outline exactly how Fincher creates the masterpieces that he does and what I can take from that and apply to my films.
Cuts are included during the scene to show the crime bosses of the other New York Mafia families being massacred. The display of brutal murders stemming from Michael as he renounces evil in the Catholic Church is extremely ironic. It reveals the hypocrisy of his words while displaying the result of his actions. Thus a clear example of contrasting
The movie gets carried away by the way it is shot, rather than what is being shot. The story feels ghastly and empty, mostly because it doesn’t have much of a hold on the audience. It lacks strength and depth. The idea of capturing the mental state of an actor in his post-prime age is appreciative, but it doesn’t appear to be much of a big deal in the end. The excellent expanse of talent that Inarritu had in his cast was, in the end, left un-tapped.
The godfather movie is one of the most movies that reflect the life of mafias world violence. produced in 1972 the first part and directed by Francis Ford Coppola. This movie is talking about an Italian mafia “family” are rich and live luxurious life who lived in New York, the main character is the godfather “Don Vito Corleone” the leader of the family. In the film, people come to him to ask for help and he accepts, but his actions are against the law; and people should be loyal to the godfather because if the godfather asks for a favor back and someone don't do it he will punish him badly and severely. However, the people they come to him to solve their problem illegally that's why they go to him directly to solve their issues.