Andrei Romanovich Chikatilo Sparknotes

1189 Words3 Pages

(Tab) The Red Ripper, the Butcher of Rostov, Andrei Romanovich Chikatilo: the most infamous serial killer of twentieth century Ukraine with the blood of fifty-six victims on his hands. An abusive mother, a childhood of deprivation in World War II, and a humiliating first sexual encounter (Biography.com Editors 2) led to his interest in murder (Lukacs 4). His morbid crimes are an excellent yet horrific example of man’s inhumanity to man.
(Tab) Andrei Chikatilo’s early life may be the cause of his several vicious crimes. When Chikatilo was born, he had hydrocephalus (water on the brain.) This handicap led to genital and urinary tract problems later in life. As a young child, at the age of five, Chikatilo's mother told him that his older brother …show more content…

Maslow’s The Farther Reaches of Human Nature, (insert Maslow reference here when you find the book). We are all born with an animalistic side, but societal standards teach us to shroud that side with “please” and “thank you” from a young age. When people are exposed to animalistic behaviors at a young age, such as eating one another or walking on all fours, they can be expected to act the same way in adulthood. In this case Andrei was exposed to cannibalism through his mother's claims that his brother was kidnapped and eaten by the neighbors, in Ukraine’s famine in which people would resort to cannibalism to survive, as well as his interest in literature featuring similar topics. The idea of eating humans became fascinating to Chikatilo, therefore he kept that animalistic side of himself and used it later on in his adult life.
(Tab) The side of his mental health comes into play when describing the way he killed people. Andrei was traumatized in his adolescence by his first sexual encounter. He attempted to take advantage of a fifteen year old girl but ejaculated in his pants. (genital/urinary tract issues as a result of hydrocephalus). News spread, and his schoolmates humiliated him relentlessly. When taking advantage of her, he was rather violent; watching her struggle and fight back aroused him he then correlated violence with sexual …show more content…

“Live life to the fullest” is an exaggeration; humans live life to the requirements, and most humans do not live, they simply exist. Man's inhumanity to man is a different kind of living that pushes the limits of living life to the fullest. Chikatilo definitely did not just exist; he lived a dangerous, felonious life. While he lived that life, he took the lives of many other who may have been destined for greatness. That is what occurs when humans are inhumane. Terrorists will bomb innocent people. Serial killers and cannibals will murder and eat innocent people. People who self harm will cut and burn themselves. Nazis tortured innocent people over there race. Therefore, inhumanity upon oneself will always exist because there will always be people who were brought up in challenging circumstances, those who suffer from mental illness, those who were abused, racism, anti-Semitism, cannibalism, sexism, and Chauvinism. Those people will always exist, the problem is not inhumanity, the problem is the human condition, the underlying problems that make people how they are. Andrei Chikatilo was exposed to famine and cannibalism from a young age, and as a result of famine, he became a cannibal like his fellow Ukrainians. Adolf Hitler was an artist, and he was criticized for his work before he got the chance to develop his skill, so he destroyed Judaism before it had time to spread it's beautiful

Open Document