And Then There Were None Play Comparison

1598 Words4 Pages

Plays and movies typically have numerous differences, which leaves watchers deliberating why directors do this. The play version and the 1945 movie version of And Then There Were None by Agatha Christie are both about ten individuals who are invited to an island by someone they do not know. All of these people have directly or indirectly instigated murder. One of these guests is a murderer, and plans to slaughter all of them by the conclusion of the weekend. Even though they are similar stories, they have various alterations that could enhance or diminish the film. Directors and actors have to construct these decisions. There are many variances in the plots and settings of the film and play version of And Then There Were None due to decisions …show more content…

One of the chief differences is that in the film, viewers can observe what is happening in more than one room. In the play, watchers can only see the living room and the balcony. Nobody knows what occurs outside of this set area. In the film, individuals see scenes from an assortment of diverse places such as the dining room, the beach, the woodshed, the bedrooms, and the bathroom. Because of this, watchers can get a larger visual of what transpires outside of the living room. When the seaweed hanging in Vera Claythorne’s room brushed her face, a scream is heard. This occurs in both the play and the film. The alteration is in the end of the film, when Sir Lawrence Wargrave, the killer, explains how he managed to slaughter all of the people. Watchers observe a flashback to when Vera shrieked. They see Wargrave and his ally, Doctor Armstrong, halt to imitate a gunshot wound on Wargrave’s head. Viewers then see Armstrong fire a shot past Wargrave, then hurry to Vera’s room, where the rest of the people are. In the manuscript version, readers do not peruse any of this. They merely read that the four men who are left run up to Vera’s room, with Armstrong and Wargrave following the other two. The director’s decision to show the scene with Armstrong and …show more content…

The entire house is shown in the film version, but it is only in the living room in the play. This is good because it adds a visual clarification. The killer does not kill everyone in one room either. This is not good because the killer is not being as risky and it diminishes suspense that is built in the play. There is also a woodshed in the film, which is where Rogers goes when he is suspected to be the killer by the other characters. This is good because it makes watchers think the killer might be Rogers, which does not happen in the play. The characters vote on who they think the murderer is in the film. This adds to the film because it adds suspense, which is not there in the play when the characters say who they it is. In the film, Wargrave tells Vera to hang herself because if she is found on an island with nine dead bodies, she would be killed anyways. This is inferior to the play because Wargrave is acting like Vera has a chance to get off the island. In the play, he acts like she must hang herself simply because of the rhyme, and he acts like he has other plans if she will not. Wargrave also kills himself by drinking cyanide, which is bad because we do not get to see the protagonist shoot the antagonist, like we do in the play. There are many differences between films and plays due to choices made by

Open Document