Trade and commerce in the archaic Greek world established itself through many means, including political institutions that would control areas such as Emporia, city state economy, and would establish and enforce commercial laws and regulations. Despite this, trade and commerce can also be discussed as being prevalent in other areas such as gift-giving and plundering from warfare during this period. Due to this, the argument can be established of to what extent was trade and commerce regulated by political institutions in the archaic period. Firstly, trade and commerce can be identified as being regulated by polis institutions through city state economy and the Agora, which was a central marketplace within the polis where people gathered. Within the Agora, artisans and craftsmen could sell the goods they produced and commercial activities could occur, including buying, selling, and exchange of goods. Herodotus suggests this when …show more content…
This is because even though city-states did not have extensive regulatory frameworks that controlled trade and commerce, they instead developed informal customs, such as gift-giving, and marketplaces which allowed for some form of regulation to still occur via the polis. Because of this, it can be argued that trade and commerce were regulated by political institutions to a certain extent, but not to the same level as a modern economy would as they simply did not have the means to do so during the archaic period. It can also be argued that primary sources such as (Herodotus Histories, and (Homer Odyssey), help enforce the concept that social and cultural customs also had a significant role in regulating both trade and commerce at the time, as both sources show practices of gift-giving and hospitality as significantly important topics which regulated a lot of the archaic
...e markets of Athens. Economically, Athens becomes the clearinghouse of Hellas, attracting artisans and merchants of all kinds, and fostering business of all descriptions to flourish. This translates into the power to dictate to the suppliers of commodities within the trading network. Where at first it is simply Athenian military might that must be obeyed, now her economic might can be felt as well across the seas, dictating what may be produced and to whom it is sold, at what price and in what quantity.
185-196. Dillon, Mathew, and Garland, Lynda. Ancient Greece: Social and Historical Documents from Archaic Times to the Death of Socrates. Routledge International Thompson Publishing Company, 1994, pp. 179-215 Lefkowitz, Mary.
The economic activity and industry are closely linked, and both played an important role in the everyday life of Pompeii’s citizens. Trade was a key aspect to the city’s economic activity. Strabo tells us that Pompeii was the port for Nuceria and Nola. Although archaeologists are yet to determine whether it was a sea port or a river p...
Throughout history there has been a common theme of progression towards more complex societies. The advent of agriculture enabled population sizes to increase, and allowed permanent settlements to arise. As extensive cultivation of farmland progressed, a surplus of food was created that enabled some people within a society to be non-food producers. These people who no longer were required to farm in order to survive were able to develop marketable goods that they could exchange for food. This transition towards interdependence, (craftsmen depending on exchanging their goods for food), brought with it an opportunity for the government within each society to exact some tribute for monitoring the economy, and making sure that exchanges went smoothly. This led to societies with a well-defined hierarchy and slowly led to the abolition of the egalitarian societies where everyone engages in the same means of production. Within these aforementioned egalitarian societies there is some occupational specialization, but it is based on the skill of the craftsmen, and no one is a full time specialist. The differences in the economies of Copan, Teotihuacan, and ancient Rome, can illustrate why and how economies increase in complexity, and what criteria are necessary for large-scale economic specialization. More specifically, what factors limited Copan and Teotihuacan, preventing them from attaining the population size, and economic complexity of ancient Rome.
...ificantly impacted the evolution of commercial law. The rapid expansion of European economies in the eleventh century exponentially increased the merchant class. The increased number of merchants subsequently led to an increased number of disputes when trading on an international basis. Local governments refused to fulfill the dire need of merchants, thus Law Merchant was created. Rules were established for trading between merchants which would address the previous issues involving hostility, cultural differences, and different trading customs. Courts were formed to settle disputes between the merchants. These courts formed swift and fair judgments through the help of local experts in commerce. However, the government eventually absorbed these courts by copying the Law Merchant’s rules and the Law Merchant faded away until its reappearance several centuries later.
Roman vs. Greek Civilization Although both Roman and Greek civilizations shared similarities in the areas of art and literature, their differences were many and prominent. Their contrasting aspects rest mainly upon political systems and engineering progress, but there are also several small discrepancies that distinguish between these two societies. This essay will examine these differences and explain why, ultimately, Rome was the more advanced civilization of the two. Greece, originally ruled by an oligarchy ("rule of the few"), operated under the premise that those selected to rule were selected based not upon birth but instead upon wealth.
...ion back to the seasons and agriculture. Greeks were also very concerned about property rights and inheritance, as Hesiod shows us with his worries about the uncertainty of children’s paternity when women are not kept submissively in the home. Through his advice to his brother, Hesiod’s Works and Days becomes a wealth of information about the particulars of life in ancient Greece during the 7th and 8th centuries B.C.E.
Pomeroy, S.B. et al. A Brief History of Ancient Greece: Politics, Society, and Culture. Second edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
We have now examined Thucydides' strongest arguments for Athenian rule. It is clear that Athens had a stronger claim to rule than the Melians had to remain sovereign. We also know that Athens' claims hold up when we examine them for validity. Thucydides beliefs in Athens' claims were therefore well founded.
Most people provided for themselves and did not engage in any sort of trade. Most Greeks had small plots of land, and even the wealthy Greeks had a small amount of land compared to today. But the wealth and monetary value of Greeks was not based on size, but it was a relative spectrum. Where your “value” was compared to others. This is a phenomenon known as relative wealth, and was seen throughout Greek, Sparta and especially Athens. The economy of Sparta and Athens however had many resources, and impacted and reflected the fundamental institutions of their culture. The Spartan economy was mostly government controlled entity. With most of it’s productivity coming from the Helots and from military conquest. Free trade was also banned and not feasible as most men worked in the military or government. Athens had a sort of free-market and free-trade system, though they did have things socialised by the state. Athens was near the sea and traded very frequently with neighboring regions. It was not only the state that traded but the Athenian citizens, whom were free to become merchants. The economies of both Athens and Sparta reflected upon the essence of freedom and tradition which they both had liked. One economy was built on freedom and trade. The other based on tradition and military venture. These economies expressed the virtues that the two cities
The Olmec society was hierarchical, with skilled artisans known for their art and ceremonial objects. Religion played a significant role, possibly involving human sacrifice. Economy and Trade: What is the difference between
The Daily Life of Ancient Greeks Life in Greece in ancient times will remind you of your own life in many ways. There were school, family, athletic competitions, and social gatherings. Knowing that participants in their sporting events competed nude or that you rarely knew your husband/wife until the wedding day does however, make you grateful for the society that you live in today. Babies Life for the Greeks in Athens began in their home. Babies were delivered by the women of the family, and only in cases of serious complications was a mid-wife called.
The older of the two, Ancient Greece was a civilization for three centuries, from 800 B.C. to 500 B.C. Ancient Greece advanced in art, poetry, and technology. More importantly, Ancient Greece was the age where the polis, or city-state, was invented. The polis was a defining feature in Greek political life for a few hundred years (Ancient Greece).
Every idea has a start and a history that can be traced back in time. An incredible amount of these ideas and thoughts were started by great ancient civilizations. These ancient civilizations are the base of all modern knowledge. No ancient civilization has contributed more to this base than the civilization of Ancient Greece. The unique ways of ancient Greek agriculture have left a profound influence on the agriculture of today.
This week’s written assignment is to compare and contrast monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy as forms of government in Ancient Greek city-states. I will address each form of government, providing examples of each and will include applicable comparisons and/or contrasts.