Analyzing Sarah Ditum's 'Toxic'

1146 Words3 Pages

During the dawn of technology, female celebrities evolved to survive in the money-hungry influencer world. Sarah Ditum is an English opinion columnist and writer who wrote TOXIC, named after Britney Spears’ iconic song. TOXIC tells the infamous stories behind nine incredible celebrity women who were devoured by fame. Sarah Ditum states in The Washington Post that her purpose for writing TOXIC was to bring attention to, “the public, tearing these women to pieces,” which she claims, “was both a social activity and a form of divination.” (Williams). Ditum wanted to inform individuals of the excused abuse, sexism, and exploitation celebrity women faced by tabloids in the 2000s. This is exactly why I chose TOXIC for my critical book analysis. I find that as a young female individual, it is important for me to stay …show more content…

To me, her dedication to feeding the public and her fans costing her life changes the term ‘celebrity’ forever. Another quote from the book that proves Ditum’s thesis is, “her celebrity persona existed in parallel to a real life in which she found her own fulfillment” (274). This proves Ditum’s thesis because Jennifer Aniston had been put in a place in her career where she often felt as if her roles were making fun of her personal life. She even joked about it in an acceptance speech at the Women in Film Awards. She took her celebrity life as an actress and found herself through it. To me, that changes the term ‘celebrity’ because she took negative things people thought of her and turned it into a successful life. The author did not show any bias when writing this book. She did not have any bias because she used facts about how each event occurred. She also cited articles that negatively talked about each of the women to show their

Open Document