Analyzing Erikson's Psychosocial Development

1037 Words3 Pages

Erik Erikson’s psychosocial development stages explain how outside factors that can influence personality. Erikson believed that a stages must be completed during a person’s life cycle in order to see noticeable change. The sixth stage, young adulthood, focuses on the crisis of intimacy or isolation. This crisis is directly relevant to the satisfaction a young adult finds in his or her romantic relationships because the outcome of the relationships (or the lack of romantic relationships) determines whether the young adult fulfills intimacy or isolation. Compatible personalities can either halt a relationship or further the bonds that pair currently have. Personality can be determined by taking the Meyers-Briggs Personality Instrument. The …show more content…

Additionally, if a participant’s PCPs had unsatisfactory relationships, then the participant will operate under expectations and beliefs that will engender satisfactory relationships, in the hopes of having a more satisfactory relationship than his or her PCP. We also hypothesize that destructive conflict methods will be positively correlated with dissatisfaction in romantic relationships. We have listed five operational definitions: Serious relationships, primary care provider, relational satisfaction, argue, and significant other. Serious relationship: an exclusive romantic relationship that has existed for at least four months. Primary Care Provider (PCP) includes, but is not limited to, birth parents, adoptive parents, long-term foster parents, grandparents, and mentors. PCPs help pay for or completely pay for costs related to, but not limited to education, car, groceries, clothing, housing, and other basic needs. PCPs also have a significant emotional and relational impact on your life and have greatly contributed to who you are today. Relational satisfaction: The self-reported quality of an interpersonal relationship. Argue: when a couple disagrees about a certain topic or decision and goes back and forth, giving their points of view, but do so in an unhealthy and unloving way. Arguing is not the same as “discussing”, because discussions about topics or issues are done in a healthy, loving, and respectful way. Significant Other (SO): Your partner in your current and exclusive romantic relationship to whom you are fully

Open Document