Analyzing Daniel Keyes 'Flowers For Algernon'

598 Words2 Pages

Undoubtedly, Charlie Gordon should not have received the experimental surgery! While Daniel Keyes in “Flowers for Algernon” portrayed hope of a mentally impaired man, Charlie Gordon, the operation failed with devastating consequences! Charlie encountered societal complications that he was subconscious about prior to the surgery. Since Charlie was intellectually debilitated, the doctors ultimately used him to experiment on to be able to repair other humans that were similar to him. Once Charlie became a brilliant man, he understood the tragic results of the surgery. Despite the fact Charlie did not regret this calamity, he robustly abominated the society’s remarks and actions toward mentally marred humans. The reality was Charlie’s societal conflicts were true! Once a genius, Charlie recognized that Joe and Frank were not his best friends; he observed their cruelty, comprehending the harsh treatment he had received. In addition, Charlie recognized that his fraudulent friends participated in the involvement in creating a petition at work to fire him. He realized the implication of “pulling a Charlie Gordon.” Charlie felt abashed for this inconsiderate joke. Not only did he find this antic thoughtless, he witnessed the …show more content…

Before the experiment, Charlie aspired to be used for the surgery. Due to his motivation, the doctors decided to use him for their examination. This uprising opportunity caused Charlie to adjust his life. He desired to be accepted in the world because he endorsed that he had not been acknowledged. Yet, Charlie was still human. Although this is a fact, the doctors equated Charlie as if he were a mouse - like Algernon. The doctors believed society would benefit if their experiment resulted in success. However, Charlie was still a person that in reality did not need any emending. Though Charlie received the surgery, it had failed to be fully

Open Document