Proctoring at University of the People Proctoring is when a student taking an exam is overseen by a proctor. This is done for a number of reasons at University of the People (UoPeople). The university needs to ensure that a student is properly verified, as well as ensuring said student is actually enrolled in the course. Also, use of a proctor makes certain that the exam being taken is a reflection of the student's true knowledge. (UoPeople FAQ - Proctored Exams, n.d.) According to Proctored Exams - Instructions to the Student (n.d.), at UoPeople a proctor must be at least 21 years old. They also must be a reputable person of integrity. A proctor is not permitted to oversee an exam of a student if they are a relative, are also attending as a student at UoPeople, or are an applicant at UoPeople. Proctors must not have conflicted interests or any vested interest in how the student is graded on the exam. Finally, they must have reliable access to the internet, including email services. …show more content…
This can be done by selecting the 'add a proctor' link next to a proctored course. You need to ensure that if you are selecting your own proctor rather than using ProctorU services, that you provide your proctor's full name, email address, and other contact information (Proctored Exams - Instructions to the Student, n.d.). In my case, if I were to choose an offline proctor I would reach out to a former teacher of mine. I live close to my old school, and I know the internet access is reliable at that location. Also, being that I would be using a former teacher I am confident that they would meet the requirements set by UoPeople. An educator understands the importance of remaining objective and can be considered reputable as well. I believe that would provide me with an excellent proctor to oversee my
...people his confession. If the rest of the town knew he had confessed, his image and his name would be destroyed. He wants his private life to remain private at least within the court. He begs for his privacy because it is so important to him. However, he changes his mind because his name is too important, and he is hung because of it. Proctor believes so strongly about the separation of public and private life, that he is willing to die for it.
... Proctor himself was more indirect in resolving conflict where he didn’t want the events that had occurred to have happen. However McMurphy was trying to change the hospital’s normal routine and rules in order to prove a point that the other patients weren’t actually mental.
For many reasons, John Proctor is an honest man. By no means is Proctor afraid to tell you what is on his mind.
John Proctor is a good man. He is a puritan, a husband, a citizen, and an all around valuable member of the community. All of this is represented by his name. The name of John Proctor could be considered his most prized possession. It is his most priceless asset. Proctor is very strong-willed and caring. He does not set out with any intentions of hurting anyone. He is a farmer and village commoner who is faced with incredible inner turmoil. He has committed adultery and had absolutely no intentions of joining in the witch trials. After his wife got involved and eventually was set free due to the fact that she was pregnant, he feels that he can't sit back and accept what is happening to the town. John Proctor is a good and noble man and because of this he believes that he can't be hanged and die a martyr when he has this sin blooming over him every waking moment.
John Proctor is portrayed throughout the play to be a man who has high moral values that he must abide by. He can spot hypocrisy in others easily and judges himself no less harshly. Elizabeth Proctor says to him in the second act:
This is the point where you start to think; what could he have done to become a sinner? Was it a sin in the eyes of god, his friends and family, the law? The description tells us that Proctor was respected so much he was also feared. This is proved when John Proctor enters from the door and Mary Warren ‘leaps in fright’.
wrong. Proctor is willing to risk everything, including his good name and even his life, to
Proctor: You will not use me! I am no Sarah Good or Tituba, I am John Proctor! You will not use me! It is no part of salvation that you should use me!
In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, various characters, whether it is from physical trials or unseen personal struggles, experience some kind of major conflict. There are those who spend every day in fear, wondering whether or not they will be falsely accused of witchcraft. There are others who struggle with more internal trials, such as forgiving those who have hurt them. The protagonist, John Proctor, was a man of strong moral constitution, and held himself to a high standard for the sake of his good name and family. As a result of this, he struggled with a major internal conflict throughout the play.
The Proctors start sticking up for each other. Toward the middle of Act II, the Proctors get a visit from Hale who
2:Provide the email address of the proctor. 3: Provide the telephone number of the
Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, is a statement to the 17th century witchcraft. The Crucible renders John Proctor as a puritan, a husband, and a highly respected man. His name is his prime possession. John Proctor is a farmer and a villager who is faced with intense dilemma. He also commits adultery, which becomes his tragic flaw. Therefore he is to make a decision to tell the truth and ruin his name or lie and save his most prized possession. By this John Proctor is portrayed as an honest, tenacious, and faithful man.
10. Discuss the ethical and legal implications of assessment, including the right to privacy, right to know, informed consent, intellectual property rights, user qualifications, protection of test materials, and confidentiality.
In the world of education, assessments play an integral role in student learning. To get the most out of assessments, they must be aligned with the standards, accurately measure what students know, as well as promote student learning (McTighe and O’Connor, 2005). In order to do this, it is important to include students in the assessment planning process. This should begin at the beginning of a unit with the pre-assessment and should be carried throughout the formative and summative assessments. Dr. Anne Davies believes that “when students are involved in the assessment process, they are more engaged and motivated, and they learn more” (Davies, 2007, p. 31). In my interdisciplinary unit, I attempt to include students in every stage of the assessments
UoPeople requires proctored exams to ensure quality and integrity of the examination process in particular and the academic quality and integrity of the study program and the University as a whole as well as to preserve UoPeople’s Code of conduct and UoPeople’s reputation and recognition.