More handpicked essays just for you.
All quiet on the western front film analysis
All quiet on the western front film analysis
All quiet on the western front film analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Analysis of the Film All Quiet on the Western Front
I decided to write this analytical review on the film All Quiet on the Western Front.
My decision was made when I saw it as a suggested reading because I have heard about the
movie many times, yet, I've never seen it. I actually am happy I never had, because I believe I
was able to get much more appreciation out of the movie because I am studying it's topic in this
class.
As I began the movie, I could not figure out if the movie was comedic or not. The way
the movie was filmed, as well as the acting, absolutely floored me. I regretted picking this
movie, and figured that I was in for a long 2 hours. Things did get better from there. I realized
that this movie did have some humor, but only to make a grim subject bearable. This film was
great at showing people what the soldiers in the war went through.
This movie was not to show the strategies of World War I, or why or how one side or the
other won or lost. This was made to show what the soldiers went through, physically, but
especially emotionally. While this movie focused on the German soldiers, there were points in
the movie that led the viewer to believe that the case would be true for the other side too. For
example, when the group of German soldiers were trying to figure out why they were fighting.
Nobody in the group knew the answer. The soldiers did state that the same is possibly thru for
the soldiers they are fighting against. By the end of the conversation, the group realized that they
are being used as pawns to fight other pawns. Neither side was fighting for their own good, the
soldiers were just fighting so they don't die. The soldiers decided that the officials who started
the war should be the ones fighting each other, and the rest of the people should be able to stay
out of it.
As the movie began, I could not figure out what side the soldiers were fighting for. This
bothered me, I believed at first that the movie was made poorly, and should have made a point as
Both victory at “Victory at Avalon” and “Why we Fight” were created to inform the population of what was happening during
As they tried to get through the enemy line a lot of the Light Brigade
war, "I never figured out what you guys who got me into all that trouble were saying." In
The novel All Quiet On the Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque, the poem, “In Flanders Field,” by John McCrae and the film, Gallipoli, Demonstrates how war makes men feel unimportant and, forces soldiers to make hard decisions that no one should half to make. In war people were forced to fight for their lives. Men were forced to kill one another to get their opinion across to the opposing sides. When men went home to their families they were too scared to say what had happened to them in the war. Many people had a glorified thought about how war is, Soldiers didn't tell them what had truly happened to them.
All Quiet on the Western Front is a powerful novel that communicates many messages concerning war’s hidden horrors and gives insight into the unique experiences of soldiers. Remarque uses a wide array of language techniques and writing concepts to expose readers to truth of the simultaneously corrupt yet complex affair that is war. It is an important, genuine novel – the type that needs to exist to end dreadful human affairs, such as
because they felt it was their duty to fight for their respective side. Most who fought, however,
...the 1979 film adaptation of “All Quiet on the Western Front” failed to live up to the novel. Because it was made in the 1970's, the special effects were unrealistic and inferior to what one pictured while reading the novel. Compared to the novel, the film was also practically censored in terms of how graphic it was. Remarque intentionally made the novel graphic in order to present the anti-war theme, therefore the effectiveness of the film was diminished. The acting in the film was also mediocre and disappointing, and the cast was not well chosen. The trenches in the movie were also slightly softened from how they were described in the novel. Paul Baumer's thoughts and feelings were also not presented as well as they were in the novel. Ultimately, the novel was much more effective at delivering its anti war message, and telling the story. I is not happy. Penispuffer.
In 2006, a film directed by Clint Eastwood was released in theatres around the world titled Letters from Iwo Jima. Unlike most war movies that are produced for the American public, this film entirely captures the World War II battle of Iwo Jima from the perspective of the enemy. For a rare change, Letters from Iwo Jima shows the cultural aspect and daily life the Japanese soldiers experienced during the war. Although the film was given many positive reviews and was noted as one of the best films of 2006, it still received mixed emotions from both the Japanese and American public. One of the main ideas of the film focuses on the idea that good and evil exist on both sides, and that although we share different ideas, thoughts, traditions, and customs, we are all human and share more in common than we think.
was a spectacular film there were some things that I did not enjoy like, the
For most of the world’s conflicts until the presence of violent non-state actors, clashes have occurred between large state entities. The wars and skirmishes consisted between the two states with a separate armed forces contingency battling each other on a set stage with defined ethical and political motives. This black and white model of violent conflict resolution became the standard for a long stretch of time and was agreed upon by all state actors. One of the reasons that Coker discusses for the advantageous nature of the set battlefield and soldiers includes the preservation of humanity for the civilian population and the soldiers. The mutual agreement of ethical boundaries even in war protect those not taking up arms and helps to maintain decency when regarding prisoners of...
A certain matter-of-fact quality pervades the descriptions of the wounds inflicted and received by soldiers; the face-to-face attacks with rifle butts, spades, and grenades; the sounds, smells, and colors of death and dying in this book.
...e preceding reasons, all college students should read the book. The book will captivate the educated mind, and most importantly, will cause that mind to think and to question why things happen as they do.
Although there were many concepts that were present within the movie, I choose to focus on two that I thought to be most important. The first is the realistic conflict theory. Our textbook defines this as, “the view that prejudice...
Baz Luhrmann has done this film in a unique and brilliant way, with help of the above, and of course a great loved story as a base.
There is an intellectual discussion over the accuracy of war films and whether or not these should focus more on telling the truth or decorating it a little. Indeed, the narrative of war films has change throughout the years because the purpose of such films has evolved, especially those representing the World War II years and the aftermath. At the time of war, films were employed with diverse objectives for example to urge the public to support the war, to narrate the latest events, or to rebuild the image of the heroes. Most of the times the perspectives of films could vary depending on the country the film was produced in or which side of the story was being narrated. The plot of most war films might not be real, but they were necessary