Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay evolution of human beings
What are the implications of the Neolithic revolution
Essays on human evolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay evolution of human beings
Asking the question “where did we come from?” seems to be one of the oldest of human traditions. We know that modern day humans evolved from primates and early ape-man to eventually conclude with our modern day humans, otherwise known as, Homo sapiens. A question remains though, where did our humanity come from? Where was the turning point that separated us from the rest of the animal kingdom and into the dominating force of the planet? This moment can be traced back to the time of the Neolithic revolution, in an area known as the Fertile Crescent, where the first sedentary human civilization began, and forever changed the course of human history. Nestled between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, is a stretch of land called the Fertile Crescent, …show more content…
It allowed for people to specialize within their community. This allowed for some people to be, for example, farmers, merchants, artisans or labors. With this new creation of diverse roles, there needed to be a central government to regulate trade, enforce laws and to protect the citizens. For example, we see evidence of a central government in the archeological records by looking at how these ancient civilizations were set up. These city-states we laid out in a careful manner, the homes were not randomly placed, but were placed in a way that was symmetrical and allowed for roads. That meant that there had to be a watchful eye overseeing the construction of these homes, making sure that the plans were being followed. Another piece of evidence that there was a central leadership, was the fact that most of the city states had some sort of fortification or protection such as towering walls around the city’s borders. Showing that there must have been a plan in place and a compelling force to make sure that these walls were constructed in the intended way. While the previous examples show the positive sides to having an elite ruling class, there is a dark side. The dark side of this whole matter is that in order to have an upper class, there must be a lower …show more content…
In the archeological record, we start to see proof of social stratification in how people were being buried. Some are buried with a lot of care and adorned with many material goods, while some were given humble burials, those that would be seen as fit for the lower class. This shows that social power was not only being measured in privilege and access to resources but in material goods. Social stratification is also the cause behind shift in attitude towards the sexes and the races. We see the beginning of social constructs like race and gender. For example, race is not actually something that makes us biological different from one and other. The color of your skin or your “race”, is determined by where your ancestors evolved from in the world. If your ancestors were from somewhere along the equator, like Africa, then natural selective pressures favored those with more melanin in the skin to protect an essential vitamin called foliate. It actually has very little scientific significance because it is completely arbitrary. So race is not an actual reality but is a social invention that we use to separate and label
The study of race and its social formation in the article "Racial Formations" by Michael Omi and Howard Winant challenge our socially accepted concepts of "race", race being defined as the social categorization of black, white, yellow and red people. Race plays a pivotal role in society because it has a overwhelming influence on an individuals life choices and outcome. Society has historically placed positive and negative stereotypes on different races. Whites are presented and in many cases perceived as the standard of civility and beauty. People of color are conveniently grouped together as disingenuous to American patriotism in addition to being subjected to perpetuating stereotypes such as being lazy, criminal, and deviant to general society. Race in scientific terms is a fabrication, and societal terms it is a reality. Through the study of race and it's history we are able to understand it as a myth while analyzing it's social implications.
In ancient times, Iraq was known by the Greek term Mesopotamia, or the land between two rivers. These two rivers, the Tigris and Euphrates, formed what was known as the “Fertile Crescent.” The vast stretch of low level land retained rain and flood water, making the soil exceptional for farming, thus it is said to be the cradle of civilization. It was home to the Sumerian Empire, beginning around
The argument for understanding race as a social construct is that there is a lot of cultural assimilation in the United States, as a reflection of social, economic, and political worlds. There is an understanding that some groups are inherently different than others and some groups are more dominant because of this. There are social divisions of race as seen on the US census, college applications, medical papers, etc. Also, the social, economic, and political divisions that have arisen around the different categories of people in different races have amplified the social differences between groups. By example, there is more likely to be poor academic performance in inner city schools due to social factors, but this has nothing to do with biological factors. Race today is generally defined by how people are seen by other people. These perceptions can be based on ancestry or based on phenotypic characteristics but are more subjectively seen by cultural beliefs, economic needs or political affiliations. Modern racial categories are so subjective that they are ever changing as time is passing. For example, not all black people share the same origin, culture, or economic status, but they may all be grouped to categories based off of their looks rather than what they actually are like. Race is socially constructed because it is not fixed/fact. People decide who belongs to which race and these decisions can
If race was “real”, then racial classifications would be constant all around the world, but someone considered black in the United States might be considered white in Brazil. In addition, racial categorizations in census forms vary widely between countries and across time in the same country. It is important to note that, in 2003, as part of the Human Genome Project, researchers concluded that “3 billion base pairs of genetic letters in humans were 99.9 percent identical in every person”. Which leads me to say that race is a social construct. It is important to explore this further to better understand the capacity race has to affect other parts of life.
Race, as a general understanding is classifying someone based on how they look rather than who they are. It is based on a number of things but more than anything else it’s based on skin's melanin content. A “race” is a social construction which alters over the course of time due to historical and social pressures. Racial formation is defined as how race shapes and is shaped by social structure, and how racial categories are represented and given meaning in media, language and everyday life. Racial formation is something that we see changing overtime because it is rooted in our history. Racial formation also comes with other factors below it like racial projects. Racial projects seek
Race has no biological meaning. There is only one human race; there are no subspecies, no single defining characteristic, traits, or even gene, separates one “race” from another. Instead of being a biological concept, race is a social construct, and a relatively modern one at that. It was created to give light-skinned Europeans an advantage by making the white race superior and all others inferior. Throughout its history, the concept of race has served this purpose well.
Social reality of race simply refers to the fact that people still believed that races are based on physical traits such as skin color or hair texture to judge others. However, what they are doing is stereotyping which lead to discrimination and racism. Also, their actions denied the fact race is culturally constructed, meaning people have different customs, religions, and values from culture to culture. The patterns of biological variation among humans are extremely complex and constantly changing. All of us could be classified into a number of different "races", depending on what genetic traits are emphasized. For example, if you divide people up on the basis of stature or blood types, the geographic groupings are clearly different from those defined on the basis of skin color. Focusing on such deceptive distinguishing traits as skin color, body shape, and hair texture causes us to magnify differences and ignore similarities between people.
...lieve that races are distinct biological categories created by differences in genes that people inherit from their ancestors. Genes vary, but not in the popular notion of black, white, yellow, red and brown races. Many biologist and anthropologists have concluded that race is a social, cultural and political concept based largely on superficial appearances. (4)
Race is a social construct that has been used to justify the capitalization of slavery. These subtle genetic phenotypic differences have become a very crucial influence on the lives of people because it is fundamentally how they identify with themselves and with others alike. The color of the skin had become somehow synonymously intrinsic with self-worth and acceptance; moreover, dissociation and low self of esteem if views are unfavorable.
The concept of race is an ancient construction through which a single society models all of mankind around the ideal man. This idealism evolved from prejudice and ignorance of another culture and the inability to view another human as equal. The establishment of race and racism can be seen from as early as the Middle Ages through the present. The social construction of racism and the feeling of superiority to people of other ethnicities, have been distinguishably present in European societies as well as America throughout the last several centuries.
Before we were Free, by Julia Alvarez, captures the experiences and the challenges of twelve year-old Anita de la Torre living in the oppressed Dominican Republic. Anita has spent most of her years as an ebullient adolescent, thriving in the comfort and luxury found within the gates of her family’s lush compound. Anita is torn from her euphoric life around her twelfth birthday in 1960, when the walls of her safe haven seemingly crumble as she discovers more and more about the reality of her broken country, it’s threatening dictator, and her family’s involvement in a plan to overthrow him. Before we were Free boasts a similarity to The Book Thief. Both of these books focus on a torn nation and a dictator. Perhaps the most similar feature in these two books lies in the personalities that they revolve around--teen girls facing increasing dangers, yet managing to persevere even when they feel as though they cannot go on any longer. Although the books revolve around different eras and different dictators, they closely mirror one another.
Although we often use race to classify, interact, and identify with various communities, there is a general consensus among scientists that racial differences do not exist. Indeed, biologists such as Joseph Graves state, "the measured amount of genetic variation in the human population is extremely small." Although we often ascribe genetics to the notion of race, there are no significant genetic differences between racial groups. Thus, there is no genetic basis for race. Our insistence and belief in the idea of race as biology, though, underlines the socially constructed nature of race. Racial groupings of people are based on perceived physical similarities (skin color, hair structure, physique, etc.), not genetic similarities. Nevertheless, we are inclined to equate physical similarities with genetics. Sociologists also use a temporality to argue that race is a social construct. The notion of race results from patterns from the signification of certain traits to different groups of people. However, these patterns (and societal notions of race) change over time. For example, the 20th century belief that "In vital capacity… the tendency of the Negro race has been downward" is certainly not commonplace among individuals today. Notions of race also differ across societies. Racial attitudes towards blacks, for example, are inherently different between the United States and Nigeria. These arguments all suggest that race is socially constructed. The lack of a universal notion of race means that it is not a natural, inherent, or scientific human trait. Rather, different societies use race to ordain their respective social
...e people began to settle in villages the beginning of social class and government were formed to maintain order and a sense of security as a community. Other technological advances were made as well including the making of bronze to form stronger weapons and permanent homes.
Imagine if animals were free to roam everywhere and we lived amongst animals. In the novel We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves by Karen Fowler, Fowlers asks her readers to think about whether using animals to conduct experiments is ethical? She explains that many people believe that the crucial difference between humans and the rest of the animal is we believe that we are the only animals that have a theory of mind, which is the ability to attribute mental states such as desires, intents, or beliefs, to oneself and others also to understand that other beliefs, desires, and perspectives are different from one’s own. Rather this ethical framework has been proven wrong and many people still believe it. Chimps have shown to have a theory of
A government was required to lead the people and aid in organizing a city. City governments were far more powerful than the council of elders and local chiefs of farming villages. At first, Priest probably had the greatest. In time, warrior kings came to power as chief political leaders. They soon set themselves up as the chief hereditary ruler and passed their power from father to son. Governments soon became more complex as rulers issued laws, collected taxes, and organizes systems of defense. To enforce order, rulers relied on royal officials. Over time, government bureaucracies evolved. Almost always rulers claimed their power came from god or divine right. These rulers then gained religious power as well.