We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves Analysis

1625 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Issues of euthanasia

Imagine if animals were free to roam everywhere and we lived amongst animals. In the novel We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves by Karen Fowler, Fowlers asks her readers to think about whether using animals to conduct experiments is ethical? She explains that many people believe that the crucial difference between humans and the rest of the animal is we believe that we are the only animals that have a theory of mind, which is the ability to attribute mental states such as desires, intents, or beliefs, to oneself and others also to understand that other beliefs, desires, and perspectives are different from one’s own. Rather this ethical framework has been proven wrong and many people still believe it. Chimps have shown to have a theory of …show more content…

When you are young you do not really have a choice in the situation you grow up in. Imagine being raised with a chimp; to you that was normal but to everyone else that was crazy. Therefore, embarrassed to share the fact that you grew up with a monkey in fear being ridiculed or rejected from people. The ethical issues that arose throughout the novel were that Lowell, Rosemary, and Fern were forced into an experiment against their will which did not maximize their happiness and minimize their pain (utilitarian approach) but rather did the opposite. One of the ways, Fowlers expressed her viewpoints is using the character of Lowell. Since Fern was brought into their family when Lowell was very young; he did not have the choice to grow up with a chimp. Therefore, depriving him the chance to grow up as a “normal human”; which is the way he would have grown up if he did not have Fern as a little sister. When Fern was taken away it caused him to become very angry and leave his family to try to save her from her captives; as her older brother, it was his job to protect

Show More
Related

  • The Fifth of March by Ann Rinaldi

    1111 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...own choices and the uncertainty that accompanies growing up. Rachel Marsh is a twelve year old indentured servant at the beginning of this novel. She is as lucky in her establishment as she is ill-fated in her sole remaining family member, the crucial, predictable, corrupt and wicked uncle. She is (and was in reality) the nursemaid to John and Abigail Adams. Abigail, an intelligent and forward thinking woman, mentors the young Rachel with books and unfettered opinions. While she is on her quest “to better herself,” she meets up with many of the pivotal figures of the Boston Massacre, such as Henry Knox, Samuel Adams and Paul Revere. Central to Rachel’s saga is her friendship with a young redcoat who becomes involved in the Massacre, causing Rachel even more confusion as she makes her mind up about liberty, civil actions and personal and national freedom and identity.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Inherit The Wind

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the main themes seen throughout the play is that being ignorant would not allow progress. Being intolerant of change and difference would hinder you from moving forward in life. The theme is revealed through the townspeople, Brady, and Brown. The characters all represented narrow-mindedness. The townspeople did not accept the Theory of Evolution, and did not accept any other opinions on how the world was created, other than the miracle the Bible had given. In addition, both Brady and Brown did not accept the theory of evolution as well. They were focused on the Bible, and never thought about things logically. In a court session, Brady was bigoted and refused any knowledge from Darwin’s textbook. Through the proverb that was stated by both Brady and Drummond, “He who troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind and the fool shall be servant to the wise at heart” (67, 126), It reveals how one who would not move on from the past would be left behind and would not move forward. Not progressing would have its consequences. The people of Hillsboro, Brady, and Brown all received consequence...

    Read More

  • Pros of Animal Experimentation

    921 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although not as strictly addressed, there is still a schism when it comes to the matters of experimentation involving animals. Those in opposition of it see it as being against the will of the animal, because animals have no say in the matter. However, through animal experimentation there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians , research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many more years to cure, and the use of animals is highly ethical considering what could be the alternative, although there is progress being made to change these measures. This is how animal experimentation is of use to society for humans and animals.

    Read More

  • It's Hard Being Me Analysis

    529 Words  | 2 Pages

    An identity crisis is defined as a period, at which an individual struggles with one's own sense of self. I believe that everyone goes through such a crisis at one point or another; however, I do not feel it is correct to say, everyone goes through this type of crisis entering their first year of college. Now, I am not say that someone can’t have an identity crisis entering college for the first time, for is was made clear in the essay, that some people can indeed, have a sudden realization of either finding or losing one’s self in college. In turn, it is fair to say that most people do develop a sort of crisis when embarking in the college life. It's a time in your life when you experience the world in a new light—and usually on your own.

    Read More

  • We Are Free To Be You Me Stupid And Dead Summary

    1357 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Everyone loves free expression as long as it isn't exercised” (Rosenblatt 501). In the article, We are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid, and Dead, Roger Rosenblatt argues for the people’s right to freedom of speech and expression, that is given by the U.S Constitution. Rosenblatt argues that freedom of speech is one of the many reasons the Founding Fathers developed this country. For this reason, Rosenblatt believes that we should be tolerant and accepting of other’s ideas and beliefs. Even if one does not agree with someone else, they need to be understanding and realize that people have differing opinions. Everyone has the right to free expression, and this is what Rosenblatt is trying to get across. The necessity of freedom of expression and the important values it contains is a main foundation for this country, therefore, Rosenblatt’s argument is valid.

    Read More

  • We Are All Bystanders Analysis

    509 Words  | 2 Pages

    Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people.” We are All Bystanders by Jason Marsh and Dacher Keltner is an article that reflects on the psychological and social phenomenon that refers to cases in which people do not offer any assistance or help to a victim. Studies say that a person's personality can determine how they react to a bystander situation. In a book called, The Heart of Altruism, author Kristen Monroe writes the altruistic perspective. Altruistic people are strongly connected to other humans and have a concern for the well-being of others. Markus Zusak’s The Book Thief exemplifies the bystander theory through Liesel and

    Read More

  • Quiz Show by Robert Redford

    1538 Words  | 4 Pages

    Richard Goodman also thought ethically when he made his own decisions. He wasn’t persuaded by the producers, like Van Doren and Herb Stempal. Robert Redford demonstrates that decisions of the main character in the movie were influenced by their ethical thinking. Some of these characters made decisions based on their ethics and morals, and some didn’t, which lead to inevitable consequences.

    Read More

  • Summary Of A Question Of Ethics By Jane Goodall

    677 Words  | 2 Pages

    Goodall argues that her readers have an ethical obligation to protect animals from suffering, but she also implies that it might be necessary sometimes to abandon that obligation. She points out that animals share similar traits with human beings: they have a capacity for certain human emotions, and they may be capable of legitimate friendship. Goodall’s evidence for this claim is an anecdote from her research. She recounts that one chimpanzee in her study, named David Greybeard, “gently squeezed [her] hand” when she offered him food (62). Appealing to readers’ emotions, Goodall hopes to persuade readers that the chimp is “sociable” and “sentient,” or feeling (62). According to Goodall’s logic, if researchers are careful to avoid tests that cause human suffering, they should also be careful to avoid tests that cause suffering for other life forms.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing: What if You Were in Their Place?

    1622 Words  | 4 Pages

    Philips, Trevor. "Human Self-Interest Will Ensure That Animal Experimentation Continues." The Independent (25 Apr. 1998). Rpt. in Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 21 Apr. 2011.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing: Unnecessary Pain for Dubious Gain

    1607 Words  | 4 Pages

    “The question is not, can they reason, nor, can they talk. But can they suffer?” (Bentham). Each year over a hundred million animals endure a number of experiments in an attempt to make human lives easier. These experiments range from cosmetic testing to medical research, sadly neither of these tests are needed. Many people will accept animal research because they believe that these animals aren’t suffering (“Harm and Suffering”) or they believe that animal testing in beneficial to humans. In reality, these animals suffer for mankind, when the need does not exist. Animal testing creates unnecessary pain and suffering for animals, when in reality most experiments will not benefit human health.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing: Life or Death

    792 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...e's soul remains unawakened.” ~ Anatole France. Animals bring out the best in humans. I think some scientists know what they are doing is cruel but they don’t want to think that they are mistaken. We were meant to love and care for animals, not torture and abuse them. Animal testing is brutal and deprives animals of very minimal rights. Testing on animals can lead to inaccurate results harming both animals and humans. Living in the conditions that animals in laboratories do, is scarring for life and experimentations are harmful and cruel. Animal Testing is not necessary and wastes expert scientist’s time and work on unethical experiments with inaccurate outcomes. Humans have become conscienceless, but we can change that by saving innocent creatures from unimaginable harm. I hope that one day we will live in a world where it is not acceptable to abuse animals at all.

    Read More

  • Everyone Leaves Analysis

    1562 Words  | 4 Pages

    Everyone Leaves Essay Ever wondered why people leave for many reasons and some stay? One of the reasons would be escaping the negative environment that the person or people have experienced in their past life, a reason for staying would be the fact that the environment they grew up throughout their lives is a mentality to them, or a family emergency. Based on the book called Everyone Leaves, the theme tells the readers that people do have a choice but to leave because, the only options they have are to suffer the consequences and live through the mentality for the rest of their lives, or leave to escape the negative atmosphere to find peace again and to pursue a new life. But, situations where someone is being forced to leave, then the person

    Read More

  • Morality Of Euthanasia In The Movie 'Million Dollar Baby'

    771 Words  | 2 Pages

    Whether Maggie Fitzgerald’s decision to die is ethically acceptable or not cannot be determined because James Rachels never mentions the ethicality

    Read More

  • Ethical Dilemma: Animal Testing in Medical Research

    831 Words  | 2 Pages

    The question of whether or not animal testing is morally right or wrong has been debated for years, with each side presenting valid arguments. But when it comes down to morals and common compassion, animal testing that involves inflicting pain is always wrong. Cruelty supporters argue that no matter the pain, the 98.8 percent similarity between chimps and humans genes is too medically useful to be wasted. Most experiments scientists perform on chimps involve their brains, which have the same gene regions as humans. This similarities of the

    Read More

  • Animal Emotions

    1281 Words  | 3 Pages

    The experiments and other data show that animals are not just driven by instincts alone. There is more to them than that. It is hard to watch dogs play and believe that they derive no fun or pleasure from it at all. Animals have shown that they are sensitive to their social surroundings. They punish one another and alleviate other’s pain. Some monkeys in established communities attack those that find food and don’t share. These studies are important. A better understanding of how animals are feeling could create a whole new guideline of rules on the way animals should be treated. Humans should not be so arrogant to believe they are the only animals capable of emotion. How are we capable of seeing from their viewpoint and assume they feel no emotion.

    Read More

More about We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves Analysis

Open Document