Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short essay on communism
The nature of communism
Discussion on communism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short essay on communism
“Communism is the death of the soul. It is the organization of total conformity - in short, of tyranny - and it is committed to making tyranny universal.” is a quote said by Adlai E. Stevenson. This quote is stating that which is evident by the use of the word “tyranny” which means the “arbitrary or unrestrained exercise of power”, mainly from an absolute ruler. When picked apart, this quote is stating that communism only spreads arbitrariness through the total conformity that communism instills. The message that this quote is sending is alluded to in the book One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich by Alexander Solzhenitsyn. This book follows Ivan Denisovich, or commonly referred to as Shukhov, through a normal day in a Soviet prison camp called …show more content…
a “gulag” in Siberia during the reign of communism in the Soviet Union. In the camp, he experiences hard labor, is given slop for food, and is conditioned to fall in line with the rest of the thousands of prisoners that are in the camp alongside him. The prisoners also have to endure the cold, which is used against them as a punishment from the higher-ups and guards. In this book, cold is used as a symbol for the state of isolation that the prisoners are in, thus proving that true communism cannot exist because a hierarchy will always fall into place. In the gulag, the cold is something that the prisoners could never escape from.
In the book, it is referenced numerous times and not only in the context of weather. The quote “When you’re cold, don’t expect sympathy from someone who’s warm.” (18) holds meaning to this. This quote means that the prisoners shouldn’t expect sympathy from higher-ups or guards because they are isolated within the cold themselves. The comparison between being warm and cold explains this. In the context of this quote, the prisoners are represented by the cold whereas the guards and higher-ranked individuals in the camp are represented by the warmth. This comparison can be validated by looking at characteristics and privileges that the two groups have: prisoners work and live in the cold, are not mixed in with the guards, and they are not allowed to have personal possessions, whereas guards and higher-ups live in the warmth of better offices and buildings, are separated from the prisoners, and receive at least a share of the unique possessions that the prisoners have. Because of the privileges that the higher-ups have, there is no reason they should be sympathetic towards the prisoners, thus making the prisoners isolated. This theme is reminiscent in the book Night by Elie Wiesel when the Jewish prisoners in concentration camps are also given limited privileges and are isolated from the guards because of a difference they have. Both groups of prisoners were shown very little compassion and received no sympathy, even when the conditions were
fatal. In both the gulag and the Soviet Union as a whole, communism was an ideology that was very enforced, but didn’t always have its intended effect. Communism is the idea that there should be common ownership of products, and also that there should be no social classes/rank. However, this quote refutes that it is the case in the gulag. “The first ones inside had a head start -- they were first in the mess hall, first to get their packages if they had any, first into the kitchen to get the stuff they’d asked to have cooked in the morning, first to the CES to pick up letters from home, first to the censors to hand in a letter for mailing, first to the barbers, the medics, and the bathhouse -- in fact, first everywhere.” (92) This quote demonstrates that the formation of a hierarchy has taken place. This is evident because the quote states that the people who got inside of the camp first were before the rest of the prisoners, which goes against the mentality of communism where all resources are shared among the general public. This is emphasized with the addition of the phrase “in fact, first everywhere” because it states that the prisoners who were able to get the the camp first were before everyone entirely, not partially. This quote demonstrates that a natural hierarchy will take place in a communist society because being first is something that cannot be prevented as someone will always have to be first in any situation, and arriving first in this case brings about a privilege which is to advance the other prisoners. Not only was there a hierarchy and privilege regarding access to locations, but also physical possessions. Through communism, every prisoner was only allowed the possessions they were given by the guards because it would make the prisoners uniform. The Soviet Union as a whole took away or destroyed anything that set one person or group apart to maintain uniformity. A quote that represents this is: “If there was any pastry or candy or something fancy like that, or any sausage or fish, the warder always bit off a hunk. (And it wasn’t worthwhile kicking up a fuss because then he’d say it was forbidden and you weren’t supposed to have it.)” (109) This quote is meant to demonstrate hierarchy between the prisoners and the warders. The warder is able to get away with taking parts of a prisoner’s package because he is higher ranked than the prisoners. This is evident by the fact that the prisoner can be easily silenced by the warder saying that the item that they have is forbidden and can take the contents for himself. This quote proves that a hierarchy will form within a communist society because when Caesar was forced to give up the contents of his package, they went right to the higher ups, which goes against the message of equal/common resources among a society that communism is meant to convey. This action is similar to the collective farms enacted by Stalin’s first five-year plan that formed large collective farms by joining smaller family farms together. Even when the peasants and citizens during these times were starving, the crops, grain, and money earned from cultivating had to be sent directly to the government under law. In the gulag, the cold was representative of the separation between the prisoners and the warders which caused the ranks of division to become clear. The emphasis that Alexander Solzhenitsyn puts on the cold also shows how much affected life in the gulag mentally and physically because was something that could not be avoided. Regardless of the degree to which communism is enforced, a hierarchy will form because of the human need for people to take charge and lead, as well as people taking advantage of privileges that they are given through communism.
After the assassination of Alexander the Great in 1881 by Russian socialist revolutionaries, Alexander III ascended to the throne and began to develop a reactionary policy that would be used to suppress the power of anti-tsarist rivals (Kort 23). In the late 1800s, Tsar Alexander III was faced with growing insurrection from the populist peasants, who were demanding more freedoms and land under the Tsarist regime. However, he was unwilling to give up his traditional centralized authority for a more democratic system of ruling. Instead, he sought political guidance from his advisor, Konstantin Pobedonostsev, an Orthodox religious conservative and loyal member of the Russian autocracy. Pobedonostsev was quick to hound revolutionaries by means
Joseph Stalin said, “Ideas are far more powerful than guns. We don 't let our people have guns. Why should we let them have ideas?”. Stalin was a dictator of the USSR from 1929 to 1953. Under his dictatorship, the Soviet Union began to transform from a poor economy to an industrial and military based one. While still a teen, Stalin secretly read Karl Marx 's book the “Communist Manifesto”, and became more interested in his teachings. When Stalin gained power, he ruled his nations using terror and fear, eliminating those who did not comply with his governance.
Since the end of World War II until the mid- eighties , most Americans could agree that communism was the enemy. Communism wanted to destroy our way of life and corrupt the freest country in the world. Communism is an economic system in which a person or group of persons who are in control. The main purpose of communism is to make social and economic status of all individuals of the same . Deletes inequalities in property ownership and wealth distributed equally to everyone . The main problem with this is that a person who is rich can be stripped of most of his fortune to someone else can have more material goods and be his equal .
Though the rewards are pleasing to the ear, the path to obtaining the benefits of communism is a violent one. This strict governing idea was derived from Communist Manifesto, a book written by two German economists, Karl Marx and Fredrich Engels, who declare that many problems in society are caused by the unequal distribution of wealth. These two believe that “Communism deprives no man of the ability to appropriate the fruits of his labour. The only thing it deprives him of is the ability to enslave others by means of such appropriations.” To achieve the goal of happiness and prosperity for all, the lines that distinguish the differences between the rich and poor must be erased. Obviously, the rich will never voluntarily give up their goods or status; therefore the figureheads must force equality among the citizens. Communism places their citizens, whether they be the wealthy or the laborers, into working classes that specify their contribution to the government. With such balanced placement of the people, individuality is impossible for any single person to achieve.
This novel and film commentary analysis or interpretation will be first summarised and then critiqued. The summary will be divided into twenty- four episodes. While summarising it is well to remember that the film was made out of the book.
These core values that Communism are built on are based on these principals: what is best for the state is best for the individual, the state is all-important, and the state fulfills everyone's needs. These ideas manifest themselves in the abolition of personal rights, the exultation of the working class, the rampant and extreme nationalism, and the development of phrases that are meant to inspire nationalist fervor. The aforementioned values and examples starkly contrast Ayn Rand's views on humanity. She regards humanity as being inherently free, and she believed the restriction of this freedom is what turns men into animals. During his speech to his comrades after his argument with Kira about Leo, Alexei refers to the counterrevolutionary peasants that attack the Communists as "wild beasts... They were beasts run a muck, beasts crazed with miser," (407) and he believed that this was caused by the removal of their freedom.
Solzhenitsyn believed that it was nearly impossible to have truly free thoughts under the prison camp conditions described in One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, or in any situation where there is an authoritarian ruler. In a pris...
Society is flawed. There are critical imbalances in it that cause much of humanity to suffer. In, the most interesting work from this past half-semester, The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx is reacting to this fact by describing his vision of a perfectly balanced society, a communist society. Simply put, a communist society is one where all property is held in common. No one person has more than the other, but rather everyone shares in the fruits of their labors. Marx is writing of this society because, he believes it to be the best form of society possible. He states that communism creates the correct balance between the needs of the individual and the needs of society. And furthermore thinks that sometimes violence is necessary to reach the state of communism. This paper will reflect upon these two topics: the relationship of the individual and society, and the issue of violence, as each is portrayed in the manifesto.
Ironically, Communism has never existed anywhere. There has never been a system implemented in our entire history by which a society has been utterly classless. Communism would be a type of egalitarian society with no state, no privately owned means of production and no social class (Wikipedia). Today there is a selection of “Communist” states that exist in a variety of locations on our globe. Sadly, all of the claimed Communist states including the late Soviet Union were and are despicable and corrupted examples of the idea of Communism. By using Stalin as an example it is quite possible to portray to the reader a simple and effective example of the flip side of attempted Communism. Stalin took control of a weak government and crafted an illusionary Communist state. Ironically, Stalin had set himself up as the dictator of a completely totalitarian society. By using the people of Russia, he was able to harness the government and use it for his own needs. This is quite similar to 1984 with the concept of Big Brother. Although Big Brother is not a person, the inner society that controls “him” creates a Stalinist nation; this was quite purposefully included by Orwell.
In the late 1930’s while the United States was going through The Great Depression the Soviet Union was going through its own turbulent times. This would be known as the Moscow Show Trials, which took place under the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin. The book Darkness at Noon by Arthur Koestler takes place during this time period. The main character Nicholas Rubashov has been imprisoned even though he always has been loyal to the goals of the party (Koestler). This showed a shift that was happening in the country and an attempt by Stalin to eliminate any possible opposition even if they were heroes in the revolution. In the text two different concepts come to light vivisection morality where the party comes before the individual and anti-vivisection morality where the individual is sacred. Rubashov in the beginning does not embrace individualism however throughout the novel he begins to adopt individualism that he refers to as grammatical fiction. Vivisection morality is never a justifiable political system. Suppressing the rights of human beings is not only inhumane but also counter productive in creating an effective and wealthy society.
What is the meaning of life? This is one of the most frequently asked questions by all of humanity since the beginning of time. It is a question naturally asked by people because they have the ability to make choices about life. The question would appear to be difficult to answer and different for every individual depending on their circumstances. It is the ultimate search for truth and purpose in life, although the meaning of life is believed to be an idea that expresses their true purpose within life. These expressions can be defined within a given proximity in accordance with their current lifestyles. Ivan Denisovich¡¯s lifestyle differs from all aspects of a normal life, for his was depicted within a Siberian work camp in the Soviet Union. Within this camp all that mattered was the amount of food rations attained and the will to live the best he could. Although he was well aware of how things function in the camp, he learned when to work hard and when to take it easy, defining his acute character. The meaning in life through the eyes of Ivan Denisovich was to live a life of integrity and honesty, utilizing an optimistic attitude in all situations, while maintaining his upholding status.
The speaker believes that “religion of immoralism will more deeply wound and damage mankind than any conceivable economic or political system”. By speaker adding the explanation why communism is a religion of immoralism, he establishes a sense of logos and pathos. By the speaker explaining his intentions behind his beliefs, he addresses his point that communism leads to a bad pathway for an individual or for a country as a whole. Furthermore, he establishes fear against communism by showing the bad sides of communism such as by stating some examples of Joseph Stalin’s explanation behind the expulsion of
The "Communist Manifesto" Mountain View College Reader. Neuleib, Janice. A. Cain S., of Kathleen. Ruffus, Stephen. The.
...reams which take possession of us because we give them force, but which we can just as easily deny" (180). This is further reinforced by Ch'en's idea that "In the last hour I have felt nothing of what used to weigh on me" (192). Ch'en is the terrorist for the insurrection. His faith had isolated himself from the world instead of submitting to it. We have a personal need for connection, Ch'en is isolated until the end, when all differences are subsumed. Communism gives a sense of escaping isolation. For under this ideology there is a personal connection and a feeling of equality. It is the ultimate fulfillment to live his idea, and more importantly to die for his cause - a cause that is much greater than the individual. In the end Ch'en becomes the bomb.
This passage, which is taken from the closing pages of Primo Levi’s ‘If This Is A Man’, describes the final days in the concentration camp. To put it into context; the Germans, who were keen to save themselves, have abandoned Levi and the others, who are too ill to travel, to fend for themselves. Levi focuses on the irony of their situation; after suffering the horrors of the camp Levi and his fellow abandoned prisoners are finally free, but in reality they do not receive the benefits normally associated with freedom, they are in fact in many ways worse off than before. In this extract Levi highlights how despite the freezing conditions, there is a thaw in human relationships.