Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Military leadership accountability
Discussing the history and purpose of War Poetry
Discussing the history and purpose of War Poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Military leadership accountability
The way that Rosenberg chose to present the war through his poem expresses his dislike for the whole effort. Picturing the fact that a simple rat could be seen as an enemy due to it being on both sides of the war in an obvious hyperbole, but this device is used as a way for Rosenberg to express his beliefs that the war has gone too far. Line 7 states “Droll rat, they would shoot you if they knew” (Rosenberg 2030) when referring to how a rat can easily cross between two opposing sides of the war. He expresses how the rat is not a part of the war and a small sense of jealousy towards that rat can be seen through other lines of the poem. As Tomas Staley said when speaking about Rosenberg “as the war became the universe of poetry, the power of …show more content…
Brooke’s poem The Soldier presents a differing view about the war when compared to Rosenberg’s who thought of the war in a negative light. Brooke actually was all for the war and had a very positive view of it, so that is the way that he chose to represent it in his poem. In lines 13-14, he states “And laughter, learnt of friends; and gentleness/ In hearts at peace, under an English heaven.” The whole poem is written in a positive tone using happy diction that presents war in a completely different light than how Rosenberg presented it. Brooke thinks of war as something that is wonderful in a way. It lets men fight for the country that they love and represent England, which he views as a great nation. This love of his nation can be from the chances of greatness he was given in life. Good schooling and a chance for a successful career. Everything else in Brooke’s life seemed to be going well and seemed to offer a good turn out, so in Brooke’s mind the war would have this same effect. He had no reason to not the view the war as anything but …show more content…
Something that Lockerd said was “Far from condemning the war, which he never lived to fight in, his poems actively affirms not only its necessity but its desirability” (Lockerd 4). Though he was not part of the war in the sense of fighting in it, he was completely in support. And, this support can very likely be attributed to Brooke’s pure nationalism. Lines 7-8 of the poem say “A body of England’s, breathing English air/ Washed by rivers, blest by suns of home” (Brooke 2019). This line can be interpreted as meaning that as long as one is with English people in the war, nothing will truly be corrupt or bad. This presents not only a positive outlook on the war, but a positive outlook on the English people. At the beginning of World War I, patriotism was common and even expected. People were all for the war which was reflected in a lot of poetry around the time that The Soldier was written. “In 1914 the British Army… was made up of professionals and then volunteers” (Welch). This was as opposed to the armies of continental Europe whose members had little choice about going to war. And because of the way the armies were made up, Brooke also felt it was right to honor the soldiers that were a part of the army. In lines 9-10, “And, think, this heart, all evil shed away/ A pulse in the Eternal mind, no less” (Brooke 2019). This can be taken to mean that the soldiers who died, no matter who they were or what they did,
Soldier Boys is a nonfiction book written by Dean Hughes. It was published in 2001, it is a book that was written about two boys during war time. There are two settings in this book, each of them are at the training camps where both of the characters are training. The main idea of this book is that two boys that wanted to be war heroes realize when they get there that it is nothing like they heard of it being like.
“The Soldier” written by Rupert Brooke in 1914 is a pro-war poem to express the bravery of soldiers going to war and fighting for their nation. Brooke's poems use of extended metaphors “Earth a richer dust.” Is used to explain that when a brave soldier dies the ground will forever hold its value. This allows him to convey his message of bravery by fighting for your nation because the earth will forever be grateful of your brave actions. He also uses personification “A dust who England bore, shaped aware,” To compare England to a mother as it gave life to the soldier and molded the
Many soldiers who come back from the war need to express how they feel. Many do it in the way of writing. Many soldiers die in war, but the ones who come back are just as “dead.” Many cadets come back with shell shock, amputated arms and legs, and sometimes even their friends aren’t there with them. So during World War I, there was a burst of new art and writings come from the soldiers. Many express in the way of books, poems, short stories and art itself. Most soldiers are just trying to escape. A lot of these soldiers are trying to show what war is really like, and people respond. They finally might think war might not be the answer. This is why writers use imagery, irony and structure to protest war.
The story has different elements that make it a story, that make it whole. Setting is one of those elements. The book defines setting as “the context in which the action of the story occurs” (131). After reading “Soldier’s Home” by Ernest Hemmingway, setting played a very important part to this story. A different setting could possibly change the outcome or the mood of the story and here are some reasons why.
In his book, My Fellow Soldiers, Andrew Carroll tells the story of World War I through the eyes of the American participants. He uses quotes, personal letters and diaries, from an array of characters, to depict a day in the life of a WWI warrior. Though, he narrows his focus on the untold story of General John J. Pershing, a US army leader. He uniquely talks about the General's vulnerable and emotional side. "Pershing was notoriously strong-willed, to the point of seeming cold, rigid, and humorless, almost more machine than man" (p.XVIII). Pershing is commonly recognized for his accomplishments during the war and remembered for his sternness. He was "…especially unforgiving when it came to matters of discipline" (p. XVIII). Nicknamed "Black Jack" due to his mercilessness towards his soldiers, in this book, Pershing is portrayed as a General with much determination and devotion to his troops, family, and close friends.
Many people question if Guy Sajer, author of The Forgotten Soldier, is an actual person or only a fictitious character. In fact, Guy Sajer in not a nom de plume. He was born as Guy Monminoux in Paris on 13 January 1927. At the ripe young age of 16, while living in Alsace, he joined the German army. Hoping to conceal his French descent, Guy enlisted under his mother's maiden name-Sajer. After the war Guy returned to France where he became a well known cartoonist, publishing comic books on World War II under the pen name Dimitri.
... a lot of propaganda for people to join the war effort. Poets were describing war as this very noble thing for men to do. Wilfred Owen says that war was not noble at all. He shared his views on war and stayed true to what he believed. He did not follow the masses and write poems about the “great” war.
... is a voice that will support or oppose a cause. While I understand that there are wars that are worth fighting, it is just as important to know which wars are not worth fighting. I see this poem as Owen opposing the war not because he is afraid of fighting evil, but because he sees World War One as a war that is not necessary and is doing more harm than the end result of good. War is supposed to be evil and awful. It is that way so people do not enjoy it. Owen employs point of view, Latin, and tone to challenge the view that dying for one’s country is a noble cause.
World War One had an inevitable effect on the lives of many young and naive individuals, including Wilfred Owen, who, like many others, joined the military effort with the belief that he would find honour, wealth and adventure. The optimism which Owen initially had toward the conflict is emphasised in the excerpt, in which he is described as “a young poet…with a romantic view of war common among the young” (narrator), a view which rapidly changed upon reaching the front. Owen presents responders with an overwhelming exploration of human cruelty on other individuals through acts of war and the clash of individual’s opposed feelings influenced by the experiences of human cruelty. This is presented through the horrific nature of war which the
It is evident that the socio-cultural context in which Wilfred Owen operated had a powerful impact upon his poetic motivation and the messages he conveyed through his work. Before exploring Wilfred Owen’s work we first must understand the society that Wilfred Owen lived in, to be able to really understand appreciate his poems and their impact on society. At the time in which he operated, Britain’s public opinion on warfare and conflicts were astonishingly positive, especially in the early stages of WW1. These false perception on war led the vast majority of male citizens to perceive war recruitment as an opportunity to set off on ‘terrific adventures’ and earn immense amounts of honour for their families and nation. Government propaganda meant that soldiers believed that they were gathering fame and fortune in the name of Great Britain. This cruel and false perception of warfare which in turn led to a steady rate of volunteers for the war and included Wilfred Owen himself. The men who did not go and fight for their nations were perceived by society as cowards as
In 'The Soldier', Brooke's sense of indebtedness to his country completely blots out any sense of loss or regret over possible death on her behalf. Brooke doesn't even mention war in his poem. He is ready to give "back the thoughts by England given". He accepts death in war as a suitable repayment to his country for what England has done for him.
Ultimately, we have two poems which can be compared on the grounds of their subject, but are poles apart regarding their message. The structure of these poems is not what would be typically expected from a war poem, but are structured on the basis of these typical structures in order to create some sense of familiarity. Brooke’s poem expands on this familiarity while Owen attempts to deliberately sabotage it. In regards to content, Brooke shows throughout his perception of the nobility of dying for one’s country, whilst Owen uses all of his poetic techniques to show the opposite.
The poetic techniques used in Wilfred Owen’s war poetry sweep the reader from the surface of knowing to the essence of truly appreciating his ideas. Through sonnets, Para rhymes, ironic titles, voices and strong imagery, not only is the reader able to comprehend to the futility and the horrors of the Great War, but also they can almost physically and mentally empathise with those who fought. Through the three poems examined, it is evident that Owen goes to great effort to describe the conditions and thoughts of the First World War, thus his works are considered an invaluable asset to the modern literature.
There are many things in this world that are impossible to understand without first hand experience.This can be especially irritating for people who have the knowledge, but see everyone else with the wrong idea. Philip Larkin and Wilfred Owen show this in their poems about the common misconception of war glorification. Through imagery and the use of similes, they explain what it's really like for a person to go into battle. To outsiders, fighting in war is a noble cause worthy of envy and praise, but from the inside perspective the only thing war does is take away the innocence of
Wilfred Owen joined the war at the age of twenty-two. During the war, he saw the worst of the battlefield and often wrote poetry to document his perspective on the war. In 1917, he was affected by an explosion and after he healed, he returned to service and died in battle in 1918. His biographical context is important to understand Owen’s point of view for this poem.