Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Narrative essay the sniper by liam o’flaherty
Analysis of the sniper by Liam O'Flaherty
Analysis of the sniper by Liam O'Flaherty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Narrative essay the sniper by liam o’flaherty
In The Sniper, written by Liam O’Flaherty, the main character is trying to avoid getting killed, but the man wanted a smoke the man’s plan was working, but his carelessness turned a quite night, into the worst night of the man’s life. The man was reckless and his brothers’ death was his fault. The man was reckless and clumsy to everyone around him at the scene. First of all, he only should of done what he needed to, to get in and out alive, but later in the story, he got really reckless. He had let it show too much and decided to light up a smoke, in the middle of the night, in the middle of enemy territory, possible surrounded by enemies: “Placing the cigarette between his lips, he stuck a match, inhaled the smoke hurriedly and put out the light” (O’Flaherty 01). A gun goes off and a bullet whizzes bye, the man ducked for cover and fires a return shot. The man missed, but got hit himself, a bullet to the arm practically mobilized his whole arm. He could have avoided this tragic mistake if he had stopped and thought about the situation, and the possible consequences of what could happen …show more content…
If the man had actually considered what would happen if he lit the cigarette he could have avoided the whole situation and being able to get out alive without killing anyone, he could have done it.
He had his chance to escape when he lifted his cap and pretended to be shot. But he didn’t, he tracked his opponent and shoots him, ensuring the enemy is dead. This enemy was the mans brother, the recklessness of the man lighting a cigarette killed his brother. As O’Flaherty writes, “The sniper turned over the dead body and looked into his brothers face.”(02) If he had smoke off of the building then his brother would still be alive and he wouldn’t have had to risk his life to eliminate opposing sniper. When he ran across the street to find out the identity of the sniper, a machine gun opened fire upon him. The man should have safely left when he had the
chance. In conclusion, the man was reckless and the death of his brother is entirely his fault. He should have called it quits when he knew that it was safe to leave, after he fooled his brother with the hat over the gun barrel trick, this way both of them would have lived, and the man wouldn’t have to live with the burden of his brothers death on his shoulders.
In “The Sniper” the conflict is man vs man, which means main character is tasked with killing his enemy, but it proves to be quite a challenge. Even though there were many challenges the sniper followed through with his job and persevered even after he was shot in the arm. Wanting to kill his enemy, stay alive, and be one step closer to ending the war was his main goals. Being brave, he took off his hat, placed it on his gun, and raised it above the edge of the roof. Instantly the enemy shot at it and the sniper, pretending to be dead, waited until the enemy got up for him to shoot him. He did some quick thinking and, with determination, handled the conflict quite well.
In Liam O'Flaherty´s The Sniper, all of these are brought to an acute reality in a single war-torn city. Strong cerebral convictions and opposing philosophies, due to which people want to destroy.
In “A Brief Encounter with the Enemy” by Said Sayrafiezadeh, Luke, a pessimistic soldier, walks down memory lane as he travels the path to get to the hill during his last recon. He remembers appreciating nature, encountering and writing to Becky, the first time he’d shot a gun, and Christmas leave. Luke identifies the moment when he realizes that he had joined the army for the wrong reason, after crossing the bridge his team built in order to cross the valley, and at the same time dreading the return to his former office job. Boredom and nothingness destroy him mentally as he waits for enemies to appear. When the enemies finally appear, he shoots them down and goes home the next day. Sayrafiezadeh proposes that expectations don’t always equate
Both characters in the novel go unnamed to create a more relatable and easily assessable experience for readers. The Man fights for his survival and, more importantly, his son’s throughout the narrative. However, the Man accepts death to be inevitable, for example when the Boy asked his father if they are “going to die” he responds by saying “Sometime. Not now” (McCarthy 10). The moral dilemma that the Man must face is how far he would go in order to keep his son safe. The Man carries with him a pistol that has two bullets: one for his son and one for himself. But, when the Man has to use a bullet to save his son’s life from a man threatening to kill him, he is left with only one bullet which he saves for his son in case circumstances get too grim. The Man decides that he would rather face whatever were to happen, whether it be gruesome murder, being eaten alive, or other horrific acts of violence from fellow man as long as his son does not have to. Not only is the Man willing to die for his son, but the sole reason that he is fighting for life is to keep his son safe. As the Man put it, “the boy was all that stood between him and death” (McCarthy 29). The story takes a turn when the Man becomes ill, and with his illness worsening by the day, he realizes that he is dying. The Man’s fears of not being able to care for his son becomes realized. But, when he knows that
This is pretty damn crazy because of the fact that if anyone would just leave a bag down with a gun in it, they would be kind of at risk to be caught. Later on, the narrator states, “three days later, in Dallas, I shot some senator. It was a tricky one. From two hundred yards away, half a view, side wind. He was dead before he hit the floor.” This plays a significant part in this story because the narrator acts like what happened the day before never happened. He goes on with his life even though he just stopped himself from killing someone that he knew, but what if that senator was just as good as Mr. Grace, except he never helped the narrator. Everyone has done their sins in life, but everyone also helps people in one way or another. You only remember the ones who helped you though. What are the odds of you actually killing someone that helped you or even saved you in life? Those are slim to none and if that does happen, sometimes you have to do your job anyway, you can’t just stop what you do for a
"There are wounds that never show on the body that are deeper and more hurtful thananything that bleeds. Don 't wait until you break. - Laurell Hamilton" This is oftentimes the sentiment felt by soldiers who have served in active duty and have been witnesses to tragedies that leave them emotionally scarred. The Clint Eastwood directed film, American Sniper is amovie that features the real life tragedy of American soldier, Chris Kyle, who served in theUnited States military as a Navy Seal, which is an elite group (Kenny, 2014 and Treitschke,2015). His story is unique in that he himself suffered from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(PTSD), but as he worked to recover, he valiantly served again by helping fellow soldiers withPTSD ("Chris Kyle," 2013), and was senselessly gunned
The short story “The Sniper” attempts to educate the reader about the life of a sniper during the civil war. While analyzing “The Sniper” the book lover learns that the sniper is astronomically competent. The reviewer is persuaded that the main character is indubitably cognizant in his profession for the following reasons. In the fourth paragraph, the protagonist is faced with a dilemma that could potentially jeopardize his life, “It was dangerous. The flash might be seen in the darkness and there are enemies watching. He [the sniper] decided to take the risk. Placing a cigarette between his lips, he struck a match… Almost immediately a bullet flattened itself against the parapet of the roof.” Not only is there proof of his knowledge in the fourth paragraph, but also in the
American Sniper is the autobiography of Chris Kyle. Chris Kyle is Navy SEAL sniper who has 160 confirmed kills during his military career. Even to this day that number has made him the most deadly sniper in American History. By his fellow friends and SEALs he was known as a “legend”, and he was feared by enemies. Not only was he a sniper but he was also a husband and a loving father.
The author brings us face to face with the main characters, their feelings, the current circumstance and the reality of war. Through his vivid description of the young man on the trail, I wouldn’t have seen him as a threat either. As I read the passage, the same thought came to me, what would be the harm if I let him walk away? He was a young man walking down the path with ease and not in a hurry; not thinking this would be the day he would die. As the author described the sequence of throwing the grenade, not thinking about killing another human being, the automatic reflexes of throwing the grenade before actually thinking about it and finally realizing the plight of the young man as the shell landed at his feet and went off made me feel profound
The Sniper was proud of what he done. Once he accomplished his mission, he wondered who he had assassinated. He ran to the inactive body laying there, lifeless. He turned the body over and… he was looking at his own brother’s face.
Choices often influence our everyday life. But have you ever thought of the small choices you make daily? What if one of those choices impacted your life forever? The short story "Choices" by Susan Kerslake is about a woman named Peggy who chooses to go on a trip with her boyfriend Ken which leads to an accident that causes her to go to the IV for the rest of her life. The story shows us how choices can have a great impact on our lives. The setting of the story is very important and the general theme of the story is about the little choices we make and how important the choices we make can be. Also, I think this story is both similar and different than the short story "The sniper" by Liam O'Flaherty in many ways.
The author of “The Sniper” is James Riordan. James Riordan created a name for himself as a respected Russianist, and children’s author and translator. Riordan is relatively qualified to write a story based on the snipers of Stalingrad, for he spent an amount of time researching the topic in Russia. In Moscow, Riordan studied Russian politics and history, becoming well versed on the rising of The Communist Party (Riley). Much of Riordan’s life was spent studying and debating Russian politics and history, making him relatively qualified to write “The Sniper.” One could argue that Riordan held extreme political opinions, which could cause a story to fall towards subjectivity. However, the story has remained extremely politically neutral, and “The Sniper” is fictional; a subjective fictional
Although the man was a “good guy” he still engaged in quite a bit of violence throughout the novel. While walking in woods, the man and his son encounter a group of “roadrats” or people of the road who murder and steal from people. The man shot and killed one of the “roadrats” who held a knife to his son’s neck (McCarthy, 66). At one point in the novel, he was attacked by a random man, who he then shot He also shot and killed a random man in a building with a flare gun after that same man shot him in the leg with an arrow (McCarthy, 263). One last example of violence the man committed was when he caught the “bad guy” who stole all of their belongings on the beach. Instead of just taking his items back from the thief, the man takes everything from the man including the clothes on his back and the shoes on his feet, threating the entire time, “I’ll kill you where you stand” (McCarthy, 256). The man’s acts of violence are justified. In almost every instance the man is either protecting his son and himself or in a situation where self-defense is necessary. One can believe that any father would do anything to protect his child, especially in the world they live in now. The man even makes it a point to tell his son, “I will kill anyone that touches you”, proving he is willing to anything possible, including murder, to protect his family (McCarthy, 77). Dealing with the thief was simply an “eye for an eye” type of situation. Although it wasn’t necessary, it was justified because the thief “didn’t mind doing” the same thing to the man and the boy (McCarthy,
Despite their strong wills and actions, no man is without fear, and both displayed moments of cowardice. As the narrator shaves the face of the man who has caused him much strife and pain, he imagines ending his life, the simplicity tempting him to become like those he has despised, the murders and executions of the war. He knows to kill and maybe die for his cause would be noble; thinking many would consider him “the avenger of [their] people” (345), but he allows his fear to control him, and spares the man. Although holding moral belief is not a condemnable act, in this circumstance the man was talked down foremost by fear, then by moral, and so by definition this was an act of cowardice. Captain Torres was not able to dissuade his fears either, the entire circumstance was a result of his fears pushing him to behave foolishly. At the end of the story, he admits to knowledge of the barbers revolutionary position, and that his associates believed he would be killed in the barber shop. This goes to show that the Captain came into the shop to prove his superiority over the rebellious, fearing that those around him around would otherwise think of him as fearful. This is not a fear of mortality, but instead a fear of how other perceive him. He put himself in harm's way to momentarily settle his lack of self esteem, and that is a foolish act that could only be driven by fear and
he felt threatened, but in any case he made the decision to shoot him. In