Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the importance of character development in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In “A Brief Encounter with the Enemy” by Said Sayrafiezadeh, Luke, a pessimistic soldier, walks down memory lane as he travels the path to get to the hill during his last recon. He remembers appreciating nature, encountering and writing to Becky, the first time he’d shot a gun, and Christmas leave. Luke identifies the moment when he realizes that he had joined the army for the wrong reason, after crossing the bridge his team built in order to cross the valley, and at the same time dreading the return to his former office job. Boredom and nothingness destroy him mentally as he waits for enemies to appear. When the enemies finally appear, he shoots them down and goes home the next day. Sayrafiezadeh proposes that expectations don’t always equate …show more content…
to reality, and those expectations don’t always fulfill the desire self-image and adventure that are advertise if people don’t make the most of their opportunities. People have the tendency to romanticize any potentially dangerous event, such as a behavior, relationship, or in Luke’s case, an occupation. People also choose occupations that would emphasize characteristics they want to make of themselves. For example, someone who yearns for the self-image of smart, rich and successful would be a doctor or a lawyer; someone strong and heroic would be a soldier or volunteer. Society creates the standards that in order to be successful, one must have an education and subsequently work in a prestigious field. In an American society, people strive to be an individual, Luke is no exception. Luke realizes how immature he was when he joined the military out of “vanity and pride” to make himself attractive to girls (8). For Luke, he dreamed of “being possessed with exceptional courage and heroism” but in the end “was going to get out of the Army and be exactly the same person before [he] joined,” effectively demonstrating how correlation doesn’t imply causation (9). In addition to, when Luke killed a man and a child in cold blood, the author portrays the reality of the military and war, linking to Luke’s epiphany that war isn’t the adrenaline pumping adventure he thought he was involving himself with. He joined the military expecting to change himself and his dull life for vanity, subsequently joining for the wrong reasons because he didn’t factor in the reality of his fantasy. While most individuals who participate in prestigious fields exhibit a charismatic demeanor, simply engaging in an ideal activity doesn’t make the person the ideal they wish to be. The author uses first person narrative in order to illustrate Luke’s retrospection, which in turn makes him an unreliable narrator because he is the only narrator whose perspective and emotions the reader can interpret.
Luke has flaws that make his views subjective instead of objective. Furthermore, Luke has a firm position that something miraculously exhilarating will give him a “‘life-altering experience’,” but when it doesn’t occurs, he becomes despondent (9). This shows one of his major flaws of assuming and expecting, but not acting upon the event for the dreams he wishes to be. Consequently, the resulting disappointment from expectations makes him feel “less like a soldier and more like [he] was going trick-or-treating dressed as a soldier” (4). He becomes overly critical of others as well as himself for joining for “all the wrong reasons,” yet never explains what the right reasons are (3). The closest actions the reader will receive depends on Luke’s desire to do anything. The author utilizes Luke as the narrator to effectively parallel Luke’s ordinary life to the expected dramatic life Luke wishes for. The similarity of the two situations is Luke’s lack of effort to better himself. In Luke’s recent years, he earned an associate degree, landing him an office job; however his pessimism and laziness to put in effort to better himself, such as going back to school for a bachelor’s degree in order to acquire a more entertaining job restrains him. His attitude towards his
office job is negative, therefore he feels it’s a boring job. And so, Luke picks up another occupation and joins the military. As previously mentioned, Luke’s greatest flaw is assuming and expecting. Luke assumes the military will give him the desired dramatic exhilarating life, thus expects a self-image change in return. The reality Luke encounter is the same as his office job; both occupations are agonizingly boring. The military didn’t change Luke’s attitude about his occupation; his negativity alter his views when reality didn’t equate with his fantasy, and it can be interpreted that Luke did the minimum effort to sustain his lifestyle when h chose to get fat instead of staying in shape (9). Luke’s point of view demonstrates that expecting change while not generating the effort to improve will not transform anything. The right attitude and motivation reflect on a person’s character to transform their life. Luke joined the military for the wrong reason because he had the wrong attitude. Expectations could equate to reality if the motivation and effort exists.
The short stories "The Interlopers" and "The Story of an Hour" are both great stories. The Interlopers stars Ulrich von Gradwitz and Georg Znaeym along with their decades-long family grudge. The Story of an Hour includes Mrs. Louise Mallard and the unfortunate death of her husband. To compare and contrast these stories, we need to know where their plots overlap and where they are set apart.
In the story “Home Soil” by Irene Zabytko, the reader is enlightened about a boy who was mentally and emotionally drained from the horrifying experiences of war. The father in the story knows exactly what the boy is going through, but he cannot help him, because everyone encounters his or her own recollection of war. “When their faces are contorted from sucking the cigarette, there is an unmistakable shadow of vulnerability and fear of living. That gesture and stance are more eloquent than the blood and guts war stories men spew over their beers” (Zabytko 492). The father, as a young man, was forced to reenact some of the same obligations, yet the father has learne...
Victors and Vanquished by Stuart Schwartz attempts to explore differing perspectives of the conquest of Mexico as the historical narratives are from both the outlook of the Spanish conquistadors as well as the Nahua peoples. In these primary sources, there was a fundamental focus on the encounters between the Spaniards and the Mexica. The first source is an excerpt from The True History of the Conquest of New Spain by Bernal Díaz del Castillo, a Spanish conquistador, who participated as a foot solider in the conquest of Mexico with Hernán Cortés. Although Díaz del Castillo was a witness of the conquest, he wrote his account of what he had witnessed decades after the Spanish victory, in 1521. In his account, Díaz del Castillo concentrated on the ways in which the Spanish viewed the Nahua peoples. The second source is taken from the Florentine Codex and is one which was collected twenty
There is a major change in the men in this novel. At first, they are excited to join the army in order to help their country. After they see the truth about war, they learn very important assets of life such as death, destruction, and suffering. These emotions are learned in places like training camp, battles, and hospitals. All the men, dead or alive, obtained knowledge on how to deal with death, which is very important to one’s life.
He was a young man in his twenties, pressured by his family and peers to fight for his country despite not wanting to. The use of imagery allows the reader to see through his eyes. Though untrue, the fact is it could have happened. This gives the reader a “taste...
The author, Tim O'Brien, is writing about an experience of a tour in the Vietnam conflict. This short story deals with inner conflicts of some individual soldiers and how they chose to deal with the realities of the Vietnam conflict, each in their own individual way as men, as soldiers.
In the aftermath of a comparatively minor misfortune, all parties concerned seem to be eager to direct the blame to someone or something else. It seems so easy to pin down one specific mistake that caused everything else to go wrong in an everyday situation. However, war is a vastly different story. War is ambiguous, an enormous and intangible event, and it cannot simply be blamed for the resulting deaths for which it is indirectly responsible. Tim O’Brien’s story, “In the Field,” illustrates whom the soldiers turn to with the massive burden of responsibility for a tragedy. The horrible circumstances of war transform all involved and tinge them with an absurd feeling of personal responsibility as they struggle to cope.
The PBS Frontline Documentary The Untouchables shined light on the claim that wealthier people in today’s society get off easier when they break the law. During the financial crisis of 2008, it was said that fraud was committed when many mortgage bankers and high-end executives on Wall Street knowingly bought loan portfolios that didn’t meet their policy credit standards. Even with the evidence in place, no one was arrested and held responsible for a stock crash that nearly destroyed the entire financial system of the United States. With a powerful justice system and justifiable evidence in place, no was prosecuted. Did the justice system not take the necessary steps to ensure that justice was served
War slowly begins to strip away the ideals these boy-men once cherished. Their respect for authority is torn away by their disillusionment with their schoolteacher, Kantorek who pushed them to join. This is followed by their brief encounter with Corporal Himmelstoss at boot camp. The contemptible tactics that their superior officer Himmelstoss perpetrates in the name of discipline finally shatters their respect for authority. As the boys, fresh from boot camp, march toward the front for the first time, each one looks over his shoulder at the departing transport truck. They realize that they have now cast aside their lives as schoolboys and they feel the numbing reality of their uncertain futures.
Facing hardships, problems, or obstacles shouldn’t discourage one from completing their task or job. Many of authors usually put their characters through tough complications to show the reader that no matter what happens; anyone could pull through. In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connel, the main character Mr. Rainsford gets stranded on an eerie island with a bad reputation. He meets General Zaroff and gets thrown into a huge hunting game, where his life is on the line. In the end, he wins the game and will continue to hunt animals, but not people, as the general once did. He will continue to hunt because one, hunting means everything to him. Two, he will not continue the general’s crazy ways, and resort back to the legal and non-dangerous to other humans sport. Third, he feels powerful when he becomes the hunter and not the hunted. Giving up hunting would be like giving up his life, so just because of a minor block he had to overcome, he will not give up hunting.
Have you ever thought about what it was like to live during World War 1, or what it was like to fight at war? At first glance of any war piece, you might think the author would try to portray the soldiers as mentally tough and have a smashing conscience. Many would think that fighting in a war shows how devoted you are to your country, however, that is not true. According to All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque, the reality of a soldier's life is despondency, carnage and eradication at every bombardment. Living every day is not knowing if they will eat, see their families, or even if they will awaken the next day. Demeaning themselves from heroes to barely men without their military garment or identity. Remarque conveyed how
... horrors of war such as, his parents who still view war as glamorous and idealistic. War takes a heavy toll on soldiers who fight in it and in these dangerous moments anybody would have gone insane. It takes a very special type of soldier to be able to handle both the psychological and physical challenges that a soldier has to face in everyday battle. A soldier such as this must be capable of handling the sight of a mutilated comrade and not immediately chatter to pieces. The author conveys this message in his extreme use of words with negative connotation such as shells, typhus, dysentery, and trenches. In this portion of the novel a great deal of emphasis is placed on the word death which is repeated several times and standing on its own it holds a great deal of negative connotations. Therefore, due to the severity of the situation and the extensive use of words with negative connotations the overall tone of the novel appeared to be very depressing or serious. This selection also demonstrates just how mythical the character of war that many individuals who have not experienced the tragedy of battle believe to be true by illustrating just how appalling and grim war is in reality.
War has a definite effect on the mentality of a soldier, so much so that many result in insanity during or after the leave of combat. Timothy Findley’s The Wars, portrays the “stupidity, futility and the horror of the terrible losses of the First World War, describing war as an image of the worst that can be within a man” (Anne Nothof Interview). Findley portrays mental aspects as well as physical, that lead to Robert Ross’ demises, specifically, the conditions of war, overall aspect of war taking someone’s life and the feeling of loneliness and silence.
Saïd Sayrafiezadeh’s “A Brief Encounter with the Enemy,” is a about a man named Luke who is joins the Army looking forward to “a life altering experience.” (1203) Today, Luke was reflecting on the details of the things he experienced while on deployment. Luke recounts the first time he “went up the path” (1198), the day he and his troop “started up the hill” and the fear he felt about the unknown. (1204) He mentions that prior to his deployment his primary concern was “I wouldn’t make it over in time to see any action.” (1199) A year ago, Luke’s life was different, he worked at an office in a cubicle filling in “little empty blocks on a spreadsheet”. (1203) Luke soon realizes that he “joined for the wrong reasons.” (1204) He thinks about his friend Becky and the things they emailed about and eventually she made him feel foolish. He also reflects on the memory of the first time his father taught him to shoot a gun. It not until the evening before flying home when Luke’s dream of “confronting the enemy” came true. (1205) Sayrafiezadeh’s story, reveals that change may not always materialize the way you expect.
In a previous blog I discussed Agent Pyle from Full Metal Jacket as being condemned to die and looked at it from the perspective of Susan Sontags quote, “more upsetting is the opportunity to look at people who know they have been condemned to die” (Sontag 60). In this quote she says it is more upsetting to see a body condemned rather than already dead. After viewing the film the Sessions I see this same pattern returning but in a different sense. Mark O’ Brain played by John Hawks is a body condemned to itself--- polio disease stole from him his bodily motion, he believes he is condemned to never experience pleasure that is not brought on through unwanted bodily responses to his female aids. This condemnation it what