Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Diversity conscious leaders
Modern bureaucracy in organizations
Importance of bureaucracy in organizations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Diversity conscious leaders
The Shell Oil Company involves a group of energy and petrochemicals companies that operate globally. Shell employs over 92,000 employees and operates in more than 70 countries and territories. Shell is considered a prominent gasoline provider, offering products that range from energy fuels, lubricants for businesses, and petrochemicals for detergents, packaging, carpets, and computers. The Shell corporation is also making strides to embrace renewable energies “by creating hybrid energies with traditional fuels such as natural gas” (Shell Global, n.d.). Shell is building hybrid power plants that combine renewable energies, including those produced by sun and wind, with traditional fuels. By investing in emission-free energies, Shell seeks to improve its operations and competitive posture as renewable technologies advance. One of the HR challenges that Shell currently faces includes a bureaucratic structure that hinders effective decision making and performance at the local level. Peter Voser, the Shell Company CEO since October 2008, has been committed to breaking down bureaucratic barriers that impede performance and has consistently emphasized diversity and inclusion. Despite Voser’s recognition that different people bring different perspectives that offer value, it cannot be ignored that he was selected as CEO during one of the worst economic recessions since the Great Depression. Due to the effects of the economic recession in addition to rising internal operating costs, Voser’s focus toward advancing diversity and inclusion within his organization has been challenging. According to Diversity Journal, “Shell’s leaders, including CEO Peter Voser, are firmly convinced that, as Shell moves forward, the importance of... ... middle of paper ... ...me factors of the organization cannot be adapted to the environment. For example, Shell supports a strong stance against the issue of anti-harassment. According to Shell’s Code of Ethical Conduct, “Shell will not tolerate harassment in the workplace – that is any action, conduct or behavior which any individual finds unwelcome, humiliating, intimidating or hostile” (Shell International Limited, 2006, p. 52). An organization’s code of conduct must clearly communicate its anti-harassment policy and outline repercussions for offenders. Harassment in the workplace concerns factors such as race, gender, religion, sexual harassment, and discrimination. The anti-harassment section of the code of conduct should altogether effectively convey the business’s commitment to ensuring a fair and safe workplace that respects diversity and encourages the free exchange of ideas.
Exxon Mobil is world’s largest publicly traded integrated oil company serving companies in more than 200 countries worldwide. Standard and Poor’s stock report for Exxon Mobil indicates that Exxon’s global functional organization and substantial diversification helps mitigate its exposure to business risk and margin volatility.
Diversity is the piece that makes the modern workforce so amazingly unique and challenging at the same time. Valuing diversity means creating a work environment that respects and includes differences, recognizing the unique contributions these differences can bring, and maximizing the potential of all employees and the company. In The Loudest Duck, the author describes what often happens when diverse individuals enter the modern diverse workplace. Liswood gives great examples, analogies and shares simple insights into the hardships of bringing people from diverse backgrounds together to accomplish goals. The main emphasis is put on recognizing that diversity strictly by statistics of different races and/or genders present is insufficient.
Exxon Mobil is a great example of a corporate giant. It all started in 1870, when JD Rockefeller founded U.S. Standard oil a company that will go on to be the most profitable in the world. In 1911 the company split up into 34 different companies, amongst these companies was Vacuum oil company that will later be called Mobil Oil and Jersey Standard which was renamed to Exxon corporation. In 199 the two companies decided to work together again, this was the birth of Exxon Mobil.
Principles and values are what defines an organizations culture. The character of the organization is questioned when shameful events occur. Through these accounts of discrimination and harassment on diversity, the organizations culture is at risk. An update and review on the policies and procedures are vital for this organization. Sometimes employees need a reminder on how they should conduct business and professionalism with fellow workers. To abide by the laws of harassment and discrimination in the workplace, Treton should be in favor of the refresher course.
First the story of the Standard Oil Company briefly describes the limits of power. When Rockefeller was trying to take over the market he formed the “South Improvement Plan. When this occurred the public grew very angry with the price of trains, so nobody went on the railroads and Rockefeller eventually got the bill, until prices changed. This is an example of how the consumers, make the company run and when nobody wants to buy your product the individual must adjust. Another example would be when the Standard Oil Company was primarily the only oil company and was forced to split into thirty nine different independent companies. This shows that one business cannot control the entire market and interventions will need to be done accordingly so that a company does not have all the power.
In this world today, energy has never been at its finest. Energy resources are used to heat our homes, power our electronics, and save peoples life. Many people are unaware on where some of our energy comes from and the process it undergoes. In 2009, Cenovus Energy became a Canadian oil based company that produces “energy resources the world needs” (Cenovus Energy, n.d.). This company has and continues to heavily make a strong impact on Canada’s oil sands resources and have “conventional oil and natural gas productions” located in Alberta and Saskatchewan (Cenovus Energy, n.d.). With innovating technology, people, and machinery Cenovus Energy has manage to create a strong reputation. With a leadership team of diverse academic backgrounds
The political instability inherent in emerging economies make for very challenging business environments. In late October 1995, Royal Dutch Shell founds itself in just such a tenuous environment in Niger. As Paine and Moldoveanu (2009) outlined,Shell came under scrutiny in the 1990’s for the environmental impact that they were having on the Niger Delta. Shell was accused of creating an “ecological disaster” on the region, caused by oil spills, emissions from flaring of natural gas, and drainage of contaminated water into the waterways (Paine & Moldoveanu, 2009). Adding to the operating complexity, the Nigerian government and its leader faced escalating international condemnation for the actions of a special military tribunal
As part of its vertical integration, ExxonMobil has many retail operations worldwide. Consequently, it can sell a large volume of products in growing and developed markets across continents, hence maintain high levels of profits. The institution has expanded its sales by venturing into new regions globally (Dravenstott & Chieffe, 2011). Moreover, with the growing economy and demand for energy, it has enhanced the efforts to ensure that the needs of the world are
19. Wilkinson, Brad (1999, October) Managing diversity: Buzz word or business strategy? HR Atlanta, 8.
Phil Carroll, former CEO of U.S. Shell (SOC, the American arm of Royal Dutch Shell) believed in the importance of the servant-leader model of leadership. In the early 1990’s, when this new leadership model was introduced, it shook the foundations of a company that had known success for many years using a more traditional authoritarian model of leadership. He wanted to completely transform the company into an organization that could continue to expand, and make a profit doing so. The company needed to tap into the resource it had (and still does) right under its nose – its employees! Mr. Carroll wanted the culture of the company to be transformed into a model of self-directed leaders who share knowledge amongst each other, creating an environment of continuos improvement. According to the American Management Association “Phil Carroll has led Shell Oil Company toward a significant transformation of its corporate culture. It is comprised of a new vision, a new business model, a new system of governance, a new concept of leadership, and the use of learning...
Shell’s strategy is strongly positioned to adapt to changes, their extensive scenario planning activity allowed them to constructively think of what operations to promote in order to face environmental changes (Cornelius, P. et al, 2005). They have extensively invested in new technology and renewable resources, adapting to the environmental and social-ethical variables (Shell website, 2016).
According to Shell it strives to create a work environment where diversity is valued, where all its people are selected, developed and treated fairly on the basis of merit, and where everyone is given the
Employers in the public sector are obliged to meet the requirements of equal opportunity laws and regulations that prohibit discrimination and harassment of employees, and encourage diversity within the workplace. Leaders within the field of public administration have approached the subject of diversity not only as a legal obligation, but as an appreciation of individual differences among employees. In order to explore the role that diversity plays in the field of public administration, this paper will firstly explain and evaluate the concept of diversity. Secondly, individual, cultural, and stakeholder diversity will be explored to determine their impact on what occurs in public agencies. Thirdly, the role of diversity in the administrative process will be discussed. Lastly, the role of diversity will also be examined in relation to Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in order to identify ways that FDOT’s leaders can apply principles of leadership to improve governance within the organization.
Shen, J., Chanda, A., D’Netto, B., & Monga, M. (2009). Managing diversity through human resource management: An international perspective and conceptual framework. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(2), 235-251.
America is often referred to as “The Melting Pot” of the world. With this appellation, it is not wrong to assume that the U.S. has one of the most diverse cultures. Conversely, a majority percentage of people in America would disagree with this sentiment and argue that the U.S. is comprised of many subgroups. These subgroups vary based on race and skin color and are hardly “melted” together. This apparent racial divide is very common in many American corporations as well. Management researchers have found that maintaining a racially diverse workforce has been proven to have many important benefits within a corporation. For example, having a racially diverse workforce can help match the culture of the customers in the economy to build trust, provide new and differing insights, and right some of the wrongs caused by racism and sexism in our society. Facilitating diversity is not easy, and many organizations have encountered challenges from attempting to do so. Fortunately, there actions that organizations can take to overcome these challenges in order to make diversity a reality.