Decoding Ancient Egyptian Culture: The Palette of Narmer

1169 Words3 Pages

Ancient Egypt is a culture that lasted for thousands of years and with that came an abundance of art and artifacts that are still being examined today. Not much is exactly known about Ancient Egyptian culture but there are somethings that Archaeologist can infer about their culture. One piece that can shed some light onto the ancient Egyptians is the Palette of Narmer. The palette is intriguing both aesthetically and historically we will talk about both. Narmer’s Palette is an interesting piece I found it visually appealing at first but as I learned more about it I truly became entranced by it’s story. Visually Narmer’s Palette contains many elements of Egyptian art including hierarchical scale, stylization and repeated poses. Hierarchical …show more content…

It is the same with Egyptians and their use of sizing.; the largest item is the most important. The Pharaoh Narmer is the largest figure on the palette, this shows his power and his importance. Pharaohs were god-like rulers and were seen as far more powerful than a regular mortal. Pieces in Egypt such as this show Pharaohs as literally being larger than life. The story the Palette of Narmer tells is also a story of Narmer meaning he is even more important to this piece. Another feature that is easily distinguishable in this piece is the stylization. People depicted in Ancient Egyptian art were all made in a similar and recognizable pattern. They are shown with their body parts twisted into the most recognizable, if not physically impossible, way. The eyes and body were shown facing forward while the head and feet were shown in profile. This method of stylizing was used …show more content…

Traditionally King Menes is known as the Unifier. (Mertz 33) While he is only talked about in stories he still could be the famed Unifier. One example is that Pharaohs often had multiple names that they are referred by. It would not be uncommon for Pharaoh Narmer to also be Pharaoh Menes. The problem with this theory is there is another individual in question, Aha. Before the discovery of the Palette of Narmer Pharaoh Aha’s tomb was found. In his tomb there were two names used; Men and Aha. Archaeologist believe Aha was his Horus name, the name of the Pharaoh. Men, assumed to be Menes, was his Nebti name. Nebti, meaning the two ladies, is most likely used for the Pharaoh of both Upper and Lower Egypt which makes since considering Menes is the fabled Unifier. (Mertz 34, 35) Since both names were used to refer to Pharaoh Aha he may be the true Unifier of the two lands. Since this is all speculation historians have come up with many different explanations for these three names. The simplest is that all three names could be one person. (Mertz 34) One person and one war. This wouldn’t be too strange because, as stated before, Pharaohs often had many names. There’s also the possibility that Aha and Memes are the same person, the true Unifier, and Narmer’s Palette was merely a form of propaganda and not a historically accurate

More about Decoding Ancient Egyptian Culture: The Palette of Narmer

Open Document