Analysis Of The Loss Of The Creature By Walker Percy

1763 Words4 Pages

Life is not always easy. When we really consider all that goes wrong in a day without relenting, life truly does suck, not to mention the intense difficulty. We face this challenge endlessly, and it seems that there is always a new trial to replace the one we just overcame. Struggle seems to take two forms, the kind of struggle that is right in-front of us and the kind that slowly appears and envelops into our daily life. It is the issue of not adding difficulty within our life to have a normal simple life. Why would someone do that though? I believe that this comes from a need to blend into what is considered a normal society that has issues and tribulation. There is a need to fill this void of not lacking a challenge by a challenge being …show more content…

In, “The Loss of the Creature,” essayist Walker Percy examines the idea of regaining sovereignty and the different ways that recovery can happen. Percy uses many stories to showcase the idea of sovereignty for an individual, while at the same time drawing light to how sovereignty can be lost. Relying on experts to validate what was happening, not recognizing the struggle, and having a preconceived expectation of what is to happen are all ways that Percy highlights the loss of sovereignty. While Percy’s essay provides these theoretical ideas, “From Outside, In” penned by African American academic writer Barbara Mellix, she supplies examples of difficulty in life from personal experiences while struggling to adapt to the world of a collegiate education level that helps to illustrate and test that framework. Both Mellix and Percy both discuss difficulty in everyday life and how it can be real or imagined to fill a void. The tribulations that we experience in this world do not spare anyone. However, the question that presents itself is whether this difficulty stems from our circumstance or if we are responsible for creating it …show more content…

We place a tangible difficulty on what is happening, whether or not that difficulty is in fact real. Many times we place belief in something that is not real, as Percy mentions, “The dogfish, the tree, the seashell, the American Negro, the dream are rendered invisible by a shift of reality from concrete thing to theory which Whitehead has called a fallacy of misplaced correctness” (411). There is misplaced thoughts in the need for difficulty in the journey of moving forward, for we have shifted away from what is really happening into a zone of what should be happening. Influences from outside sources have rendered us blind to what is in front of us, we now see what we think we should be gazing upon. We change our perception to meet this new viewing point. This idea of going along with others is referenced by Mellix who states, “and slowly, imperceptibly, I had ceased seeing a sharp distinction between myself and “others” (388). Mellix worked very hard on the difficult task of attempting to lay to rest her old way of thought and adopt this new ideology and persona. There is no doubt that in this case their difficulty, yet as she worked I believe the Mellix slowly fused with the difficulty of others. She would struggle along with them, eventually losing her struggle and then unconsciously replacing

Open Document