Analysis Of The Human Resource Management Of Starbucks

1107 Words3 Pages

Introduction Starbucks, begun as a single store as a roaster and retailer of whole bean and ground coffee, tea and spices in 1971 in Seattle, Washington. As of 29th September 2013, Starbucks has grown to more than 19,000 stores in over 60 countries with approximately 200,000 employees worldwide and $14.9 billion in revenues in fiscal 2013 (Starbucks, 2013; Starbucks, 2014). Starbucks is dedicated to inspiring and nurturing the human spirit. Committed to serving the finest coffee, creating an exceptional customer experience, and being a great place to work. Starbucks call and treat their employees as partners and honored to be acknowledged for their efforts (Starbucks, 2012). Fortune magazine has published a list of the 100 best companies in the United States every year since 1998, Starbucks is rewarded this award ever since the first year, only except the year of 2001(Hinkin & Tracey, 2010; Starbucks, 2012). This essay will be divided into two parts. The first one part will critically analyse how the human resource management (HRM) contribute to the whole company from five different aspects: (a) the human resource model/approach, (b) the recruitment and selection process, (c) the rewards management system, (d) the performance management process and (e) the company’s employment philosophy and its impacts on staff motivation of Starbucks. The second part will give some recommendations to the board of directors under the hypothesis of Apple Inc. will merge with to ensure a successful takeover. 1 The Human Resource Management of Starbucks (a) The human resource model/approach The forms of HRM have been clarified by Storey (1989) into soft and hard ones. The Mic... ... middle of paper ... ...ve the qualities like adaptability, dependability and the ability to work in a team is seek by Starbucks. The company often stated the qualities that it looked for in employees upfront in its job postings, which in my point of view is an efficient method as it on one hand allowed prospective employees to self-select themselves to a certain extent, and on the other hand saved the firm time and money. 
Having selected the right kind of people, Starbucks invested in training them in the skills they would require to perform their jobs efficiently. Starbucks was one of the few retail companies to invest considerably in employee training and provide comprehensive training to all classes of employees, including part-timers. As a consequence, the cost of Starbucks’ recruitment and selection would be comparably high so finding the “right people” fast and accurate is crucial.

Open Document