Analysis Of The Hammer Of God

951 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Summary on moral dilemmas

In G.K. Chesterton 's story, "The Hammer of God", a quaint village by the name of Bohum Beacon is caught up in the suspicious death of a young man, Colonel Norman Bohum. Throughout the story, we are introduced to different characters that may have had the initiative to kill Colonel Norman. One of the first accusations made in the story was against Simeon Barnes, the town 's blacksmith. Due to the blacksmith 's physical attributes and skills, the town was quick to draw the conclusion about him being the assailant—without carefully analyzing the fact that the blacksmith did not have to be the one to kill the Colonel. Although the blacksmith was the better fit as the murderer in the story, the people in the village did not realize that there was more to the murder rather than force it. They decided to take the easier route and look for the most effortless answer, rather than analyzing the situation carefully and making sure all the pieces of the murder fit. The blacksmith shows us how the easy answer is not always the right one, and if you follow up on the simple answer, it might cause conflict between the innocent.
In the story, Simeon Barnes is portrayed as the blacksmith of the town. He appears to …show more content…

When conclusions like these are made, it tends to create conflict between other innocent people, specially in such a small town—where the story was told. In this story, the blacksmith is portrayed as a strong good Christian man, but due to the people 's laziness, they were drawn out to the easier conclusion. It also caused conflict between the blacksmith and the officer because both were very authoritarian figures and created some heat in between them. That 's why the easy answer might not always be the right one, and it could cause other people to get in trouble because of

Show More
Related

  • Jindabyne Film Analysis Essay

    2088 Words  | 5 Pages

    So the following morning, they wake up and start fishing as if nothing has happened. When they are done fishing, they report the situation to the police. Conflict then erupts between the white Australians and indigenous people. The police officer says, “We don’t step over bodies to enjoy our leisure activities. Pack of bloody idiots. I’m ashamed of you. The whole town’s ashamed of you” .The policeman speaks for the town and knows a problem like this is going to do more damage to the relationship between the white Australians and the indigenous people by bringing chaos to the town and the men could have done what is morally right, to bring unity between white-

    Read More

  • The Norfolk Five: Case Study

    1846 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the Norfolk Four case, Ford began his interrogatories by a prior assumption that the four suspects were involved in the case. As Chapman (2013) noted, “ the interrogator will use whatever means necessary to elicit a confession, and not only will the suspect confess, but they will form false memories of the crimes they did not commit,” (p.162). Joseph Dick, one of the four suspects in the Norfolk Four case, claimed that due to the harsh interrogatories, he accepted the label put on him and began to believe that he committed the crime. Accordingly, Joseph Dick and the others began telling false narratives of the way they committed the crime. Even though, their narratives contradicted with evidence and facts of the actual murder, Ford proceeded to psychologically abuse the four suspects in order to hear what he wanted to hear.

    Read More

  • Johnny Tremain

    1307 Words  | 3 Pages

    A silversmith that Johnny is apprenticing. He is a good silversmith but he cannot remember his orders very well.

    Read More

  • Mr. Hossack Murder Case Study

    832 Words  | 2 Pages

    While reading the case about Mr.Hossack 's murder i saw the wife, Mrs.Hossack, as innocent at first. The children all claimed that the two did not argue for over a year, so why would she kill him now verses a year ago? When the youngest child, Ivan Hossack, came to the stand and "told his story in a straight, unhesitating manner" it made it easier for me to believe in Mrs. Hossack 's innocence. The child even said that he saw his mother aiding his father when he called out for help. If she had been the one to swing the axe, why would she help him and risk getting in trouble? Most importantly, if he was conscious and talking, why wouldn 't he say who to murderer was? He could have easily identified his wife in the dark after being married for over twenty years, and yet he didn 't identify who had tried to kill him. Dr. Dean first stated that the axe did not hit the speech portion of the brain, so he could have been conscious and yelling out for his wife. Dean later stated that the fatal blow from the axe would have left Mr.Hossack unconscious. The murder weapon had blood on in and apparent hairs stuck to one side; "Prof. John L. Tilton of Simpson college... was unable to say definitely that the hair had been

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Gods Go Begging

    1006 Words  | 3 Pages

    There is a stark parallel between the Vietnam War and the circumstances under which life is maintained on Potrero Hill. The soldiers in Gods Go Begging are poor, uneducated, and trapped fighting in a war they do not support; the boys on Potrero Hill are also poor, uneducated, and unable to escape the war into which they were born. They are victims of their circumstances and their government. Some of the boys that Jesse meets in Vietnam are there because they were drafted. Unable to get a deferment, either due to a lack of funds or because no higher education establishment would accept them, boys are forced to go off to war. Others, like Mendez, fled to the United States in order to escape the violence at home that resulted from the United States’

    Read More

  • Analysis of Neighbors: The Destruction of the Jewish Community in Jedwabne, Poland by Janet Gross

    763 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...e of Jedwabne to seriously examine what occurred in their town. What truly influenced the murders to have occurred by the non-Jewish citizens? Gross used excerpts of the accounts that occurred. Often they seem to be untold stories that were hidden away. The stories are heart wrenching and painful. It can be understood why for so many years these people chose to hide the truth. These people murdered their friends, co-workers, and neighbor whom they lived with on a daily basis. Those involved made a conscious decision to partake in the murders they were not innocent bystanders. Some chose to partake out of fear for themselves and their families, while others had deep resentment and hate for these people. Some of it was inspired by Nazi Germany, but there had to be something deep inside those people that prompted them to act with such hate and disregard for others.

    Read More

  • How Does Henry Spearman Use Economics In Murder At The Margin

    2637 Words  | 6 Pages

    In order to reasonably deduce who the murderer is we first need to use economic reasoning to understand who it is not. Spearman manages to use the economic concept of game theory to explain why two of the most incentivized characters in the novel and the confessors of the crimes, Ricky LeMans and Vernon Harbley, indeed admit to a crime they never actually commit. Game theory as explained by Eric P. Chiang in CoreMicreconomics is, “the study of strategy and strategic behavior and is used in any situation in which one must predict the actions of others and respond by choosing among more than one strategy, each resulting in a potentially

    Read More

  • Analysis of the Jurors in 12 Angry Men

    617 Words  | 2 Pages

    Guilty or not guilty? This the key question during the murder trial of a young man accused of fatally stabbing his father. The play 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, introduces to the audience twelve members of a jury made up of contrasting men from various backgrounds. One of the most critical elements of the play is how the personalities and experiences of these men influence their initial majority vote of guilty. Three of the most influential members include juror #3, juror #10, and juror #11. Their past experiences and personal bias determine their thoughts and opinions on the case. Therefore, how a person feels inside is reflected in his/her thoughts, opinions, and behavior.

    Read More

  • Trial By Fire David Grann Analysis

    788 Words  | 2 Pages

    He inserts an allusion to an incident in the late 1600s where they executed a man’s family just by another man’s claim that his family had killed him, only to find that he was kidnapped and subjected to slave labor. It 's clear what Grann is inciting. We need to investigate death row cases thoroughly and not take everything at face value. They did not find the Englishman 's body, but yet they instantly assumed that the Englishman 's family committed the crime. That goes fairly the same in the Willingham case, the investigators found no motive for the crime, but yet they were so determined to easily pin it up on Willingham. Grann continues to use the appeal of logos by sharing the statistics of how many felons (more than a hundred and thirty people) who were exonerated from the death penalty because of DNA testing. This draws the conclusion that if there wasn 't the DNA, more than one hundred individuals would 've been executed by a “fail safe system”. Grann also included acclaimed fire scientist Gerald Hurst 's take on Willingham 's case. He eliminated a large amount of the incriminating evidence against Willingham such as the craze glass, the refrigerator blocking the back door, and his unhurt

    Read More

  • Memoirs Of Reverend Hale.

    911 Words  | 2 Pages

    I had been in the village for all but a week when I realized there was something... wrong. There seemed to be an underlying atmosphere of fear and animosity. Of course, with my wide-eyed, innocent thinking at the time, I assumed the presence of Satan had damaged the townspeople 's trust of one another. Again, I blissfully accepted this, and I was wrong.

    Read More

  • “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow”: Washington Irving's Story vs. Tim Burton's Movie

    862 Words  | 2 Pages

    names of the characters and the site of the town are consistent with the story but that is

    Read More

  • Use of Persuasive Argument in 12 Angry Men

    1024 Words  | 3 Pages

    The movie “12 Angry Men” examines the dynamics at play in a United States jury room in the 1950’s. It revolves around the opinions and mindsets of twelve diverse characters that are tasked with pronouncing the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of patricide. The extraordinary element is that their finding will determine his life or death. This play was made into a movie in 1957, produced by Henry Fonda who played the lead role, Juror #8, and Reginald Rose who wrote the original screenplay. This essay will explore some of the critical thinking elements found within the context of this movie, and will show that rational reason and logic when used effectively can overcome the mostly ineffective rush to judgment that can be prevalent in a population. The juror that seemed interesting is Juror #8, who was played by Henry Fonda. Juror #8, or Davis, is an architect, the first dissenter and protagonist in the film. He was the first one to declare that the young man was innocent and he managed to convince the other jurors to see his point of view. Durkheim states that when we respond to deviance, it brings people together (Macionis, 2013, p. 159). We affirm the moral ties that bind us together, which was seen in the movie. At first, almost all of the jurors were so bent on convicting the young man based on their feelings, but they then started to analyze the facts and they came together to make their final decision.

    Read More

  • Henry Plummer: Hero Or Criminal

    839 Words  | 2 Pages

    Which was the new site of the gold rush. But one night Henry and Jack were drinking at the Bannack Saloon and Jack began to ramble on about Plummers illegal activities and Henry was not gonna take his crap and pulled out his gun and shot him. Killing Cleveland, and making his mark in the new town of Bannack. In the middle of 1863 Bannack was booming with miners and they needed protection for their gold that they had worked hard to get and highwaymen would just steal it the next day. The town held the election for Sheriff and Plummer did run for the position but lost it too the town's butcher who was very popular in the town. Plummers anger flared up and went after the newly elected sheriff with a shotgun but a local warned him and the butcher shot Henry in the right arm. His shooting arm. He began to practice shooting with his left and began to become very accurate with it. When the sheriff heard of this he became scared and turned in his

    Read More

  • Essay On The History Of The Jury System

    638 Words  | 2 Pages

    The crowded courtroom was absolutely silent as the 12 all white and all men took their seats at the jury box. Chief Justice Albert Mason, one of the presiding judges in the murder case, asked Charles I. Richards, the foreman, to rise. Mr. Richards was asked to read the verdict. “Not guilty”, replied the foreman. Even though the circumstantial and physical evidence pointed to Lizzie Borden guilty of killing her step-mother and father, the all-male jury, men of some financial means, could not fathom that a woman who is well bred and a Sunday school teacher could possibly commit such a heinous crime (Linder 7).

    Read More

  • Analysis Of God's Bits Of Wood And No Longer At Ease

    1781 Words  | 4 Pages

    History has been told through various forms for decades. In the past, history was more commonly expressed through word of mouth, but more recently in the past century, through written text. While textbooks and articles give formal information with little to no bias, novels give a completely new perspective from the people who experienced it themselves. The Novels, God’s Bits of Wood, written by Sembene Ousmane, and No Longer at Ease, by Chinua Achebe give a more personal account of the effects of colonization. These two novels tackle the British and French method of colonization. God’s Bits of Wood takes place in the late 1940s and sheds light on the story of the railroad strike in colonial Senegal. The book deals with different ways that the Senegalese and Malians respond to colonialism during that time. No Longer at Ease is set in the 1950s and tells the early story of British colonialism and how the Nigerians responded to colonization. Comparing the two novels, there are obvious similarities and differences in the British and French ways of rule. African authors are able to write these novels in a way that gives a voice to the people that are most commonly silenced during colonialism. This perspective allows readers to understand the negative ways that colonization affects the colonized. Historical fiction like God’s Bits of Wood and No Longer at Ease are good educational tools to shed light on the history and effects of colonization, but they do not provide a completely reliable source for completely factual information.

    Read More

More about Analysis Of The Hammer Of God

Open Document