Analysis Of The Gaelic Response To British Colonization

1489 Words3 Pages

Gaelic Response to British Colonization: The Arguments A conquered people leave behind little in records. This statement is certainly true of the Irish after the Elizabethan and Cromwellian conquest of Britain. Historians must then search for a reliable source for the history of those conquered.. Luckily, Ireland has a long legacy of bardic poetry. In the four papers we read in this class, four authors, Brendan Bradshaw, Nicholas Canny, T.J. Dunne and Bernadette Cunningham, already analyzed these poems. Each has come to different, separate conclusions, about how the conquest effected the native Irish. The opinions vary. Brenden Bradshaw sees a new nationalism arise. The others disagree. T.J. Dunne …show more content…

Dunne’s work, Tom Dunne, `The Gaelic Response to Conquest and Colonisation: the Evidence of the Poetry’ in Studia Hibernica 1980, does a good job of explaining the inherent problems in attempting to ascribe cause to the Gaelic reaction. As he aptly points out, the conquered rarely write their own history. The Gaelic, as victims of colonization had very little voice. Dunne attempts to give the Gaelic a voice by analyzing poetry from the later decadedsof the seventeenth century, through to 1729. He attempts to discuss the effects of conquest and colonization on the Gaelic population. I response to Branden Bradshaw’s argument that the Leabhar Branuch shows the development of Irish Nationalism, Dunne, rebuts this stating “ Neither the evidence of the Leabhar Branuch itself, or of gaelic poetry as a whole, in this time or later periods, allows this interpretation”. …show more content…

However, Canny believe that both the Irish Catholic and The Irish Protestants had mirror image reaction. Both suffered from conquest and colonization, and therefore, both faced the same fears and issues. Each one developed an attitude best described as a siege mentality [] 92 which was fueled by religious beliefs, that caused them to see conquest coming from divine intervention. Canny criticized these two groups, as he believes they should have united against a common enemy. Canny also believed that the local elite had inferior ability and discipline when compared to the English.[] 106 The poets also criticized the Lowly Gaelic peasants for seizing confiscated land, of for beginning to speak in broken English. In short Cannys theory is that the poor Irish had squandered their chance to make a stand against The English and the new Protestant church, and instead seemed focused on obtaining worldly goods

Open Document