Eyes is the window of everyone’s mind and it always be the bridge to anyone’s heart. Like in Charles Baudelaire prose poem “The Eyes of the Poor”, the author states: “ The eyes of the little boy: “How beautiful it is! How beautiful it is! But it is a house where only people who are not like us can go.” The boy doesn’t say any words, but the author can still read his mind from his eyes. And Carolyn Forche does the same thing in his prose poem “The Colonel”, he stated “My friend said to me with his eyes: say nothing.” Charles Baudelaire and Carolyn Forche us the different prose poem to tell us, sometimes if the people say noting, but you can still read their mind from their
eyes.
The somber and effusive tone of the selected passage from Their Eyes Were Watching God, by Zora Neale Hurston, is shown through its general diction and imagery. Hurston uses skillfully chosen words to enhance the imagery, and both devices contribute to the tone of this scene.
What is one’s idea of the perfect marriage? In Zora Neal Hurston’s Their Eyes Were Watching God, Janie has a total of three marriages and her best marriage was to Tea Cake. Janie’s worst and longest marriage was to Joe Starks where she lost her dream and was never happy. The key to a strong marriage is equality between each other because in Janie’s marriage to Joe she was not treated equally, lost apart of herself and was emotionally abused, but her and Tea Cake's marriage was based on equality and she was able to fully be herself.
Their Eyes Were Watching God is written by Zora Neale Hurston in the year of 1937. In the novel, the main character is Janie Crawford. Janie has been treated differently by others during her life because of how she was raised and the choices she has made throughout her life. The community is quick to judge her actions and listen to any gossip about Janie in the town. Janie is known to be “classed off” from other members in her community in various ways. “Classed off” means to be separate or isolated from other people.
"Their Eyes Were Watching God: Literary Critic Review Article." theireyeswerewatchinggod-awwoetzel.blogspot. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. .
Wealth has both a good and a bad side. It can change the life of a person for the better or worse, and that is clearly shown in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby and Zora Neale Hurston’s Their Eyes Were Watching God. Wealth effects the lives of the characters of Their Eyes Were Watching God very differently than the characters of The Great Gatsby. Janie’s wealth came about, mainly, from her failed relationships. Gatsby, on the other hand, earned his wealth, despite it being through questionable means. The characters also used their wealth for different reasons. Gatsby used his wealth in hopes to win back the love of his life, and Janie’s wealth was simply an asset to her. Even though there are many differences in how the characters live, there are similar outcomes (change wording). Their Eyes Were Watching God and The Great Gatsby take place in very different places, but despite that, their relationships and happiness are similarly affected by wealth.
Moshe the Beadle’s eyes are an example of depicting what he is thinking and feeling before and after the catastrophe. In the beginning, Moshe’s eyes are described as “dreamy” and “gazing off into the distance” (Wiesel 3). This shows his calm and content nature. But, after the catastrophe, Moshe has lost the “joy in his eyes” and has become distant (Wiesel 7). This shows how the events had taken a toll on Moshe and changed his nature. These are clear examples of how Moshe’s eyes connect to his mind and soul, as the depictions of his eyes before and after the events describe what he is feeling as well as his character.
In The Working Poor: Invisible in America, David K. Shipler tells the story of a handful of people he has interviewed and followed through their struggles with poverty over the course of six years. David Shipler is an accomplished writer and consultant on social issues. His knowledge, experience, and extensive field work is authoritative and trustworthy. Shipler describes a vicious cycle of low paying jobs, health issues, abuse, addiction, and other factors that all combine to create a mountain of adversity that is virtually impossible to overcome. The American dream and promise of prosperity through hard work fails to deliver to the 35 million people in America who make up the working poor. Since there is neither one problem nor one solution to poverty, Shipler connects all of the issues together to show how they escalate each other. Poor children are abused, drugs and gangs run rampant in the poor neighborhoods, low wage dead end jobs, immigrants are exploited, high interest loans and credit cards entice people in times of crisis and unhealthy diets and lack of health care cause a multitude of problems. The only way that we can begin to see positive change is through a community approach joining the poverty stricken individuals, community, businesses, and government to band together to make a commitment to improve all areas that need help.
Eyes in “The Displaced Person” tend to be illustrated with violent terms. The eyes are harsh and very rarely are they described softly; Mrs. McIntyre has eyes like “steel or granite,” characters’ gazes often “pierce,” and “icy blue eyes” and other similar descriptions are common.
In the novel Poor People, written by William T. Vollmann asks random individuals if they believe they are poor and why some people are poor and others rich. With the help of native guides and translators, and in some cases their family members, they describe what they feel. He depicts people residing in poverty with individual interviews from all over earth. Vollmann’s story narrates their own individual lives, the situations that surround them, and their personal responses to his questions. The responses to his questions range from religious beliefs that the individual who is poor is paying for their past sins from a previous life and to the rational answer that they cannot work. The way these individuals live their life while being in poverty
The article “Ego-Evil and The Tale- Tell Heart” by Magdalen Wing-chi Ki; argues the symbolism of the eye to represent selfishness and greed in “The Tale-Tell Heart.” Wing- chi Ki discusses that Ego- Evil is different from Superego-Evil. The Ego-Evil focuses more on oneself. Therefore, the Ego-Evil is more focused on self-love; while the Super-Ego “welcomes evil due to some "fanatical devotion" or an "ideological ideal" (Wing-chi Ki, Magdalen). The “fanatical devotion” shows the way that the narrator felt when he got rid of the body. The narrator is fascinated with thinking that he will get away with hiding the body of the man with the evil eye. The “ideological ideal” emphasizes on the narrator’s obsession with the man’s evil eye. This gives the narrator the idea of murdering the old man, but only because he feels so uneasy in the presence of the evil eye. Wing-chi Ki argues that Edgar Allan Poe gives the narrator so little knowledge of the old man. Therefore, this entices the narrator into viewing the old man based on his fondness for the man, and not the truth on why the evil eye is present. The narrator; therefore, judges the old man only on how he feels towards the eye itself, and not the old man.
Poverty is also the sole reason behind Walter’s irrational decisions. All Walter wishes to acquire as an individual is happiness for his family, especially his son Travis. The opportunities missed by Walter were all due to poverty, but now that there is a possibility for money and change.” In fact, here’s another fifty cents…Buy yourself some fruit today – or take a taxicab to school or something! (1.1.59) Walter tries every little thing to not let his son feel the poverty that the family is going through. For Walter the only way out of poverty is the dream he has for the liquor store and for that very dream he is willing to go to any measure. Hurdles come along the way; bribery is an issue that Walter must resort to. And without thinking it out through and sensibly his passion takes the best off him and the availability of money seems best fit. “Yeah. You see, this little liquor store we got in mind cost seventy-five thousand and we figured the initial investment on the place be ‘bout thirty thousand, see. That be ten thousand each. Course, there’s a couple of hundred you got to pay...
Starmans, C., & Bloom, P. (2012). Windows to the soul: Children and adults see the eyes as the location of the self. Cognition, 123(2), 313-318.
In the story “Eveline,” the main character must make an important decision about leaving Ireland, with a man her father doesn’t approve of, for a new life in Buenos Aires. Eveline ultimately uses her vision to give her faith to stay rather than her eyes giving her reason to leave. Sight is a theme in this story from the very first line, “She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.” (JJ, 29) Eveline spends her time “looking over” her life in the past and present to decide on her future. When Eveline looks at different aspects of her life, the better parts seem to be visions, or feelings rather than physical, and the worse seem to be physical present day resentment.
Clearly, then, the eye alone cannot be trusted to provide adequate information about the nature of reality. The fluid, endlessly shifting imagery of the eyes serves to represent this problem, adding to the dreamlike quality of the play in the process. Possibly, it is left to the "poet's eye" (5.1.12) to make the distinction between reality and illusion: "The forms of things unknown, the poet's pen/Turns them to shapes, and gives to airy nothing/A local habitation and a name" (5.1.15-17).
Most intriguing in Geoffrey Parker’s Global Crisis - is his discussion of Amartya Sen’s “Poverty and Famines.” Succinctly summarized, Sen argues that “famines arise more often from distribution problem[s] caused by human agency than from supply problems caused by nature.” Whether or not the relationship between ‘starvation’ and human action is accurate, the argument is embedded in the hearts of many, driving widespread perceptions of hierarchal conspiracy. But what truths are there in this conspiratorial perception of power? What action does it motivate and what inner peace does it engender?