Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Major characteristics of urban life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What is your perspective of a slum? Kevin Macleod explores ideas of what the dharavi slums are like, in Slumming it. He perceives the slums as a disgusting, nauseating and a disease ridden place, however in Let There Be Light, Kat Kimmorley, the co-founder of pollinate industry is trying to provide hope for the residents living in the area. Both have prominent voices in their documentaries but most of the voices of Dharavi people have been silenced. In slumming it, Kevin perspective of Dharavi is presented in the opening sequence of the documentary. It is employed through a close up shot of a needle being pushed into Kevin Macleod’s arm while the doctor lists various diseases, which implies the slums being a particularly unhygienic and diseases ridden. Kevin’s point of view on Dharavi also contradicts the notions of architects, planners and even Prince Charles’ who claim that Dharavi has a strong sense of community, high employment and little crime. Prince Charles’ voice implies this through his statement “even though Dharavi may be poorer in material terms, they are in many senses infinitely richer in the ways they live.” Prince Charles’ speech prompts Kevin to discover for himself why Dharavi would be the answer to anyone’s problems. …show more content…
Disease and sanitation is a major issue in Dharavi.
It’s established in the first scenes of the slums through the use of wide shots of the closely built houses packed amongst the piles of waste as well close up shots of open sewers, rats, piles of rubbish and people defecating everywhere. This concept of slums being disgusting, nauseating and disease ridden is alluded, which connects the audience to the universal presumption of a slum as a dirty environment and It makes you wonder how normal human could be living in such an
place. The Frog of the Well is a Chinese proverb which tells of “a frog that lived down in a well. All the frog knew was the patch of the sky above him, but the frog was happy because it did not know anything better. The moral of the story is: Some ignorant people know nothing aside from their own world. The situations of the slum dwellers is almost parallel to the situation of the frog. The perspectives of the people living in the slums is shaped by the environment they have grown up in. “Do you accept this as right?” Kevin asks Rajash, the tour guide. He believes it is right Because the slum dwellers have never seen outside Dharavi for generations and believe that this is the only way of living therefore they are consequently quite happy with it. But from your perspective, Is this really right? Within Let There Be Light, Kat Kimmorley, the co-founder of pollinate industry, has decided to assist slums in India through a safe and simple solution, the Pollinate Solar Light. She passionately states that these lights provide destitute families with a safe and sustainable alternative to kerosene which may produce toxic gasses. These can equal smoking 2 packs of cigarettes a day and are the second largest killer of women and children across India. Close ups of a candle symbolises the pollinate energy bringing a new light or prospect to the families who own one. Slumming it explores living in Dharavi with Kevin Mcleod. His idea of Dharavi is established through various close up shots of needles, rats and crowded areas. The opinion from Slumming It conveys the concept that slums are dirty and disease ridden. Whilst, Let There be light provides a way to help slum communities to improve their living conditions. Both Slumming it and Let there Be light gave Perspective into the sums of India.
...hese rules. They may seem unfair and even ridiculous to us outsiders, but that’s because we have more options of obtaining success than those caught in the belly of the slums. These codes are all that they have and without them, they would have no meaning in their lives, nothing to live up to day in and day out. They give these people a reason to wake up in the morning and a sense of pride that can’t be provided in any other way.
The Squatter and the Don was written by María Ruiz de Burton, with the pen name of C.Loyal. Ruiz de Burton was an Mexican-American writer born in 1832, in Baja California. As a writer, María Ruiz de Burton was the first author who write in English. During her writing career, there are few works, of which, The Squatter and the Don is the most famous and the most influential literary piece. As what has been mentioned at the beginning, The Squatter and the Don was published under the pen name of C.Loyal, which was an abbreviation of “Citizen who is Loyal”, and which stands for the political appeal that María Ruiz de Burton advocated toward local government in the nineteenth century. By using this name,
When someone thinks of the poor they instantly imagine a homeless man sleeping in a cardboard box or the nearest garbage can, but the working poor especially in the inner-city is commonly overlooked by society. However the working poor, in this case the working poor in the inner-city, are people advancing to try and make their lives better. They are taking minimum wage jobs so that they can barely afford a roof over their heads. Within Katherine Newman?s novel No Shame In My Game, she studies the working poor in the inner-city to draw conclusions about how to help them and dispute common stereotypes and the images people commonly view. Newman?s conclusions along with the way she had conducted her case study will be evaluated for her positive and negative points while searching for any biases she may have portrayed within her novel.
Overall, the SBS programme, Struggle Street (2015) provided a graphic insight into the hardships faced by lower-class Australians in Mount Druitt, Sydney. Nevertheless, viewing the programme allowed me to reflect and compare with my own observations of poverty within both Vietnam and Cambodia. The emotion I felt whilst watching the programme was incomparable to helplessly observing the great poverty within Cambodia.
Mark Peterson’s 1994 photograph, Image of Homelessness, compares the everyday life of the working class to the forgotten life of the lowest class in society. In the image, the viewer can see a troubled homeless man wrapped in a cocoon of standard manipulated 12in by 12in cardboard boxes and yarn. The yarn is what is keeping the man and box tied to the red bench. This bench has chipped paint and is right in front of a black fence. Underneath the bench is dirt and debris from the dead fall leaves. The center focal point is the homeless man on the bench. He is the focal point because he is the greatest outsider known to man. Behind this man is vibrant life. There is pulsating people crossing the clean street, signs of life from all the advertising on store windows, families walking and blurred cars filled with
Typhoid fever, smallpox and diphtheria were some of the diseases that ravaged the slums. Many children suffer from juvenile diseases such as whooping cough, measles and scarlet fever. Infant morality rate was very high. Along with immigrants, blacks suffered greatly as well. Immigrants couldn’t afford better housing, but blacks were trapped in segregated areas.
...stic things in order to live a better, more sound, and overall healthier life. Juxtaposition makes the audience want to follow through with the purpose. Exemplification causes the audience to realize the extent of their materialistic nature. A definition of the average homeless person’s terms allows him to build his ethos and consequently allow the audience to believe and follow his purpose. A majority of people are a part of the middle class, and this majority tends to judge the poor for their lifestyle whether it be through Dumpster diving or begging on the streets. However, as proven by the essay, these people have no right to do so because the poor do, in reality, have a greater sense of self than these middle-class people, similar to the rich. The middle-class citizens must no longer act the victim; instead, they should be working on becoming more sentimental.
In the Pulitzer prize-winning novel Evicted, sociologist Matthew Desmond follows eight families as he exposes how the lack of affordable housing perpetuates a state of poverty. He even goes so far as to assert that it is eviction that is a cause of poverty, not the other way around (Desmond 229). While this latter argument is as engrossing and it is striking, analyzing it with justice is simply not possible within the scope of this paper. Nevertheless, it is these two factors—inescapable poverty and eviction—that engender an unrelenting condition of financial, emotional, and communal instability, effectively hindering any chance of upward mobility.
Twenty years ago, Stack sought to explain why the impoverished area was not subject to conventional judgment and evaluation by describing the primary differences between that society, and the more affluent culture that defines the standards. To say, for example, that the average black household is unstructured would be a misstatement. On the contrary, these households are elaborately structured, but in a more fluid manner than the conventional home. Typically, these subcultures are negatively defined – or judged by what they are not. Through this lens, The Flats appears to be a disheveled mess of rats scurrying for the next scrap of food. Walking into this situation, Stack had to prove the notion that “distinctively negative features attributed to poor families, that they are fat...
This investigation is based on the assumption that gentrification with all its troubles can’t be prevented and is an inherent part of every city. What are the negative impacts of gentrification? What are the underlying mechanisms that feed these impacts? What drives these mechanisms? What would be an alternative scenario?
Despite general declining rates of morbidity and mortality in the United States over the past century, African-Americans still find themselves at a health disadvantage and account for more than 40% of diagnosed cases of chronic diseases such as heart disease, diabetes, arthritis, asthma, obesity and cancer . Studies within the fields of sociology and public health have directed their focus towards individual-level determinants of health such as socio-economic status and individual health behaviors. However, there has been insufficient attention to how and why place and neighborhood contribute to racial/ethnic health disparities. This analysis examines the health implication of racial segregation as a result of gentrification on African Americans, explores systems of segregation measurement, and proposes ways to move beyond traditional public health and health care approaches to impact relevant policy.
Gentrification is a term that has come to be associated with today’s modern culture. Gentrification is the process whereby wealthier people settle into a struggling neighborhood to evict existing residents. Justin Gomer states in their article that “[t]he most common feature of gentrification is the rise of property prices as well as house rents, thus pushing out poor residents who are unable to cope with the high prices” (Gomer, 2017). Therefore, gentrification is a term that is synonymous with the displacement of the poor communities that have inhabited an area over time, sometimes over several generations, due to arrival of richer new residents. The act of gentrification causes the displacement of lower income
According to Shipler, the working poor need remedies to improve their circumstances. Throughout his novel, Shipler addressed potential solutions that seemed to adjust the lives of the working poor. To help combat low self-esteem and competence more programs should be created by the state or local communities that could be created to assist the working poor in getting their GEDs, personal hygiene if necessary, learning skills that are necessary for job training, balancing daily personal finances, and learning how to eat healthier on a limited income. The more confidence an individual has the more likely they will be outgoing or assertive and will be more willing to apply for jobs. Applying jobs is intimidating for a college graduate who has
Gentrification is a highly important topic that has not only been occurring all over the United States, but especially closer than we may have thought. San Francisco is home to hundreds of thousands of people who have been a part of how amazing this city has become. San Francisco is one of the most visited places in the world with many of its famous landmarks, endless opportunities not only for daytime fun but also has an amazing nightlife that people cannot get enough of. People come for a great time and could not be done without the help of the people who have grown up to experience and love this city for what it truly is. The cost of living in such an important city has definitely had its affect of lower income San Francisco residents. For decades we have seen changes occurring in parts of San Francisco where minorities live. We have seen this in Chinatown, SOMA, Fillmore district, and especially the Mission district.
However, I believe that giving resources to an underperforming community, replaces a culture of poverty with a culture of dependency. Ultimately, a culture of dependency is worse than a culture of poverty because it strips the community of its identity. By changing the rules within the culture, dependency creates a limited mindset where people strive to only do the minimum. Therefore, the notion of bridging the gap between a culture of poverty and society becomes hazy, since there has to be a way to treat those that are apart of poverty and those that are apart of the larger society as equals. The preceding sparks the question of does the onlooker have to behave in some ways to change the culture’s people; that is – should the onlooker seek to improve the inhabitants’ work ethic, optimism, and the ability to follow the rules.