Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of spanish american war
Effects of spanish american war
Effects of spanish american war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Critical review of The Squatter and the Don
The Squatter and the Don was written by María Ruiz de Burton, with the pen name of C.Loyal. Ruiz de Burton was an Mexican-American writer born in 1832, in Baja California. As a writer, María Ruiz de Burton was the first author who write in English. During her writing career, there are few works, of which, The Squatter and the Don is the most famous and the most influential literary piece. As what has been mentioned at the beginning, The Squatter and the Don was published under the pen name of C.Loyal, which was an abbreviation of “Citizen who is Loyal”, and which stands for the political appeal that María Ruiz de Burton advocated toward local government in the nineteenth century. By using this name,
…show more content…
In February 2, 1848, the final armistice treaty Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed, through which the United States government got the access to entire area of California, Nevada, Utah plus some territory in Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico and Wyoming. As a compensation, the United States government paid 18.25 million dollars to Mexico.( Pecquet, Gary M., and C. F. Thies. 2010) However, apart from the death of people, Mexico lost half of its territory in this war, which initiate Mexican’s hostile towards American. In addition, after the Mexican-American war, there was an absence of national sense in Mexican, which had a negative effect on the unity and development of the country.
The book The Squatter and the Don was written under such a political and social background, therefore, this book is considered as one that carries political colors and that is similar to Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Actually, through reading The Squatter and the Don, it is not difficult to find out that Ruiz de Burton was trying to challenge the social borderlines of her time and place through her application of political illumination and her integration of historical
…show more content…
After Mexican’s sign of Guadalupe Hidalgo treaty, there has been plenty of complains in the Don Alamars family, worrying that their legal rights would be questioned by the U.S. government. As far as l am concerned, the role that Don Alamars was portrayed was a traditional Mexican man who was stick to feudal orders and the conventions of Mexicans. In The Squatter and the Don, the love story between Mercedes and Clarence can be regarded as the main story pattern that intrigued the interest of the readers. Ruiz de Burton portrayed Clarence as a brave and reasonable young man who posed different attitude towards native California resident (the Mexicans), and who fall in love with daughter of the Darrells. From this regard, Clarence can be regarded as a knight who fight for the integration of Mexican-American culture and the tense relationship between the two groups. Mercedes is another important character in this novel, who shouted out voice towards stereotypes and prejudices. As the description of the scene when Clarence first met with Mercedes, she was a shy girl and afraid of intruding the rules and traditional regulations. However, her final decision of getting married with Clarence can also be considered as a breakthrough to the rigid conventions represented by her father and her
In 1848, the United States acquired huge squads of Mexican territory at the end of the Mexican American war.
Although many Americans did not take the war seriously, the Mexican-American War of 1846 was responsible for the thousands of both Mexican and American deaths, and permanently left a scar on the the U.S’ relationship with Mexico. In 1846, the U.S declared war on Mexico after shots were fired at American soldiers on the “Texas side” of the Rio Grande, which the Americans believed was the border between Mexico and the U.S. The war was very controversial, and many Americans vigorously opposed President Polk’s decision to declare war. However after winning the war, the U.S gained most of Mexico’s territory in the West, completing the Manifest Destiny (BGE). Was the U.S. right to go to war with Mexico? The United States were unjustified in going
Rodolfo Acuña and Norman A. Graebner take opposing standpoints on this topic. Acuña takes the standpoint that the Americans took advantage of the Mexican government, which was young and unstable at the time. He argued that the United States waged an unjust war solely for the acquisition of new lands. His excerpt from Occupied America: A History of Chicanos, 3rd Edition provided the basis for his argument. On the other hand, Graebner took the standpoint that President James Polk pushed a policy, enforced by a stronger nation, to force Mexico to sell New Mexico and California and recognize the annexation of Texas to the United States without starting a war. His argument was taken from his article “The Mexican War: A Study in Causation”. Both sides of the American Imperialism argument contain their own strengths. However, after the examination of the articles, Graebner proposes a more convincing
Before the Gold rush, the United States was at war with Mexico over territory. If it had not been for the Treaty of Guadalupe in 1848 the United States might have turned out differently than it currently is today. The Treaty of Guadalupe was signed on February 2, 1848 and ended the Mexican-American war. Mexico transferred nearly half of their land to the U.S. (Rohrbough 12). Some Americans felt it was part of Manifest Destiny, especially by believer President James Polk (Smith, Orsi, and Rawls 26). The Treaty of Guadalupe guaranteed that any Mexican citizen in California who did not want to continue their allegiance to Mexico would within a year be granted the automatic “title and rights of citizens...
Over the course of early American history, America had set their eyes on expansion in the effort to trade, to market, gain resources, and security. The Americans referred their effort to expand as ‘manifest destiny,’ it was a belief that justified the inevitable expansion of the United States to the West, the land not yet settled. However, the effort in their conquest of the land was never the simplest action for adversaries from a foreign country lived or owned the land before the United States’ claim. Such volatile actions were no exception to its attempt to annex Texas into the United States. History has proven that there is always a reason for war; the Mexican-American War was a result of a prelude battle between Mexicans and Texans. However, a lack of research prevails on the reasoning of the Texans’ could falsely claim their independence from Mexico after the signature of the treaty of Velasco. The study covers the argument behind the Mexican-American War to further understand the reasons from both parties, Mexico, and
Since the publication of his first novel, Americana (1971), Don DeLillo (b. 1936) has been recognized as among the most important writers of his generation. Don Delillo demonstrates the theme of a corrupt society through his assessment of isolation, the quest of discovering self- image, and the drive toward creating a sense of doomsday.
...sted prior to the Mexican Revolution. Susana San Juan is Rulfo’s acknowledgement that the Revolution did provide an opportunity for the lower and middle classes to better them self through urbanization, but Juan Preciado details Rulfo’s insight towards those that chose to remain within the ghost towns that the conflict created. Rulfo uses these characters in combination to reveal the shortcomings of the Revolution, mainly its failures to lift the entire middle and lower class out of poverty. He believes that all that the Revolution accomplished was to provide an escape for these groups of people, not the redistribution of land that was initially envisioned.
To put it another way, through the use of oranges, for example, the novel challenges the notion of political boundaries by moving Tropic of Cancer north with undocumented Mexican laborers who are traveling in search of employment in the United States. Additionally, the novel begins to exemplify the environmental injustice. Through this artistic representation, Los Angeles begins to serve as a mirror image of modernizing process which make the city limits possible. At the same time, this depiction is what plays a vital role between “subjectivity- the survival of the individual in the metropolis – and refining process of modernity like functional, ethnic, or racial categorization” (Adamson 57). Correspondingly, Los Angeles starts to lose the “aura” of the city in its ever increasing sprawl
When the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed in 1848 it ended a long battle called the Mexican War. This ended the most expensive and deadliest war in American history. With the treaty came a new border between Mexico and the United States. This left approximately 100,000 Mexicans in what was now considered U.S. territory. They were allowed to stay and occupy their land in the newly acquired area. They were even promised equal rights and protection, which were stated in the U.S. Constitution. However, because of the quickly increasing population of American immigrants they swiftly became seen as an inferior group. Because of the drastic change in population, the Mexicans were ridded of their economic and political influences.
In fact, Mexico had a fictitious army: there was a cadre of officers, but the troops they had to send were lacking. To make matters worse, the officers were enveloped by political supporters and remained in constant rivalry. In addition, the armament was inadequate and minimal resources. On the other hand, the population lacked a true sense of nationality and pessimism had undermined the most consensual social strata. Given these conditions, the war was somewhat beneficial despite its obvious negative results. It left the seed of a more widespread nationalism, helped the maturation of Mexican politics, which saw political parties appear during the following decades would wage the final battle to settle the nation's political future. The war therefore left Mexico at a crossroads, but the country, after being aware of it, had to defend its sovereignty with greater certainty. For its part, the United States emerged from the war turned into a continental power. His future material progress was largely a result of it, but by consolidating his expansionist zeal he accelerated the struggle that from years ago was outlined between the north and the south. Thus, despite being victorious, they found themselves deeply divided and were victims of a very bloody war. Viewed from the perspective, it can be said against the traditional Mexican belief that war was essential for the development of the countries and that, despite the trauma of defeat and loss of territory, there were positive results for the Mexicans. A new, more conscious generation had lived the disaster and was determined to achieve a new
Over this course, we have come to understand the importance and the great significance of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. There are many interesting ideas and actions that occurred during the late eighteenth century and early nineteen hundreds that can be tied up to present day. We have slowly determined and realized that the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo has impacted and somehow affected the United States and even Mexico.
The Mexican-American war of 1846-1848, a contentious checkpoint in history, was the bloodshed of both the Mexican and American army over the Texas revolution and annexation. In spite of all of America’s debatable actions, the decision to wage war with Mexico was to the fullest degree, justifiable. Mexico’s inadequate government, violence and mistreatment of settlers prove America’s steps to provide for the common defense and declaration of war as worthwhile.
Mexico emerged as a republic in 1824, after breaking away from Spanish control. The newly formed nation was infested with puro federalists and centralists, extremists of the political spectrum. However, more moderates sought to form alliances with capitalist countries (such as the United States), yet such an alliance was not achieved initially as Mexican politicians could not come to a compromise of the matter. Impatience, the newfound American philosophy of “manifest destiny”, and human nature all played roles in the causation of the Mexican-American War. Thus, as the causes of the war, which were linked to territorial acquisition on the behalf of the Americans, were not justified
The conflicts between the citizens of the Arroyo Blanco Estates and the Latino and Hispanic characters - otherwise known as the bourgeoisie and the proletariats, respectively - are symbolic of the class conflict theorized by the Marxist school of thought. This excerpt shows the members of the Arroyo Blanco Estate rejoicing over the disbandment of a labour exchange – an informally agreed upon meeting location where immigrants (both legal and not) lay in wait in the hopes of finding work for the day, at any pay rate. This quote is spoken by Jack Cherrystone, one of the most developed characters of the bourgeoisie and a symbol of capitalism itself; Jack is extremely vocal about his hatred of immigrants, citing their economic codependence as a
As a Cuban writer, Carpentier has an in-depth understanding about the development of the entire Latin American Literature as a result of his experience working in journalism as well as being exiled and prisoned several times in his life. The Kingdom of This World and perhaps many other Carpentier’s works have demonstrated the influence of Western civilization, while Carpentier is aware of its limited effect on real Latin American culture in essence. For example, there is this depiction of a pastoral ball held in Santiago by the Cubans who try to imitate outdated French fashion style. “An air of license, of fantasy, of disorder swept the city. The young Cubans began to copy the fashions of the émigrés…Cuban ladies took lessons in French etiquette and practiced the art of turning out their feet to show off the elegance of their slippers.” On the other h...