Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sigmund freuds civilization and its discontents thesis
Freud's theory of society
Sigmund freuds civilization and its discontents thesis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Civilization and Its Discontents
Sigmund Freud is known for his theories and works in the field of psychology, mainly, the subject of psychoanalysis. Nonetheless, some of his works became important in other social science fields such as his work entitled “Civilization and its Discontents,” which had a significant contribution in other fields like political theory, sociology, and anthropology. This contribution is mainly because of the ideas invoked by the book with regard to the permanent conflict between the individual and the social institutions that surround him. Through his psychoanalytic perspective, Freud presents another view of understanding human and social institutions by looking at the nature of humans through the structural theory
…show more content…
In addition to the aforementioned points of Freud about happiness and contentment in a civilization, I would further argue that one of the major reasons why the problem of unhappiness exists in the society is that because ‘happiness’ is hard to define. In here, I would agree with Freud’s point that “Happiness is something essentially subjective.” Therefore, happiness is impossible to realize as it would depend on the how the individual treat and view the feeling and concept of happiness. Furthermore, men are more likely to seek actions that would resolve the problem of unhappiness rather than to seek the attainment of true happiness. Nevertheless, he posits that the concept of true happiness lies on the attainment of pleasure or pleasurable experiences. This would, however, never be attained because of the threats from our own body, from the external body, and from our relations with other …show more content…
However, despite the attainment of a “high civilization” based on this definition, humans are still discontented with what they have or what they have carried out. It is, on the other hand, based on the demands of the civilization and the factors that would contribute to the unhappiness of man./ In such cases, civilization would require man to conform with its demands, compromising man’s instinctual freedom which is eventually repressed leading to a prolonged and repressed pleasure. And as a result, the civilization imparts to humans a perpetual feeling of
Theodore Dalrymple is an English writer and retired prison doctor and psychiatrist. Daniel in his writings has frequently argued that the liberal and progressive views prevalent within Western intellectual circles minimize the responsibility of individuals for their own actions and undermine mores which are traditional, contributing to the formation within rich countries of an underclass which is afflicted by violence, sexually transmitted diseases, criminality, welfare dependency and drug abuse. His writings are generally based on his experience of working with criminals and the mentally ill. Dalrymple has been at various occasions been accused of being a pessimist and a misanthrope, but his persistent conservative philosophy has which is describe as being anti-ideological, skeptical, rational and empiricist has been worthy of praise . In 2011, Dalrymple for his works has received the 2011 Freedom Prize from the Flemish think-tank Liberia. The Theodore Dalrymple’s, “What We Have to Lose”, is the vigorous defense of civilization from barbarism. His main argument which he puts forwards with detailed examples and evidences many of them form his own experiences, recognizes that often the greatest threats to this fragile human achievement come from within. In his essay he provides a chilling glimpse at the problem we face in the West. He recognizes the fact that we have grown so used to civilization that it is almost impossible to believe that it is a fragile thing, and it can disappear. It gives us an important lesson that civilization, despite its grandeur and its seemingly endless resources, is not invincible, and can disappear. I would say we are witnessing an accelerating decline. The situation in West comes down to a point wher...
In Sigmund Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents and Primo Levi’s Survival in Auschwitz, both authors explore the source of human violence and aggression. Sigmund Freud’s book reacts to the state of Europe after World War I, while Primo Levi’s narrative is a first-hand account of his experiences during World War II. International and domestic tensions are high when both works are written; Sigmund Freud adopts a pessimistic tone throughout the work, while Primo Levi evolves from a despairing approach to a more optimistic view during his time at Auschwitz. To Sigmund Freud, savagery comes from the natural state of human beings, while Primo Levi infers violence is rooted in individual’s humanity being stripped away is.
However, in Civilization and its Discontents, Sigmund Freud wholeheartedly takes an abstract and philosophical approach to explaining the misery of humans. To Freud, misery has always been a part of the human experience. Indeed, he makes the conclusion that suffering has been caused by three forces since the dawn of humanity: the decay of the mortal body, nature, and relationships with others (Freud 44). Freud states that human interaction is often disregarded as a cause of human suffering, yet to him it seems to cause the most pain out of the three. In the novel, Freud goes on to explain that civilization was created to reduce and mitigate the suffering caused by nature and the mortal body, while ignoring the suffering caused by human interaction. Seeing as humans still suffer as they always have, Freud comes to the “astonishing conclusion that civilization itself is the primary cause of human suffering (58). He and others have come to this conclusion through observing the victory of Christianity over pagan religions (as Christianity places low value on earthly life), the conquering of content native peoples by Europeans, and the development of
In Martin Seligman and other’s article “A Balanced Psychology and a Full Life,” he states that the definition of happiness, “Is a condition over and above the absence of unhappiness” (Seligman et al 1379).
Sigmund Freud first theorized the psychosexual theory after studying a patients mental health. The theory states that a human develops from underlying unconscious motives in order to achieve sensual satisfaction.
After reading this week’s readings, I decide to focus my attention on Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents, and to briefly touch on pragmatic views. I can see the similarities between the two, were religion, philosophy and science all intertwines, as it relates to finding truth or should I say truth as it relates to achieving certain goals in order to support social values and needs. The implications that what is true, may not necessarily be true, and that any and all knowledge that contributes to human values, can be interpreted as truth. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics should be viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes and that knowledge can be evaluated from the goals that this knowledge is able to support
"The feebleness of our own bodies and the inadequacy of the regulations which adjust the mutual relationships of human beings in the family, the state and society" (Freud) Freud also thinks that there’s sense of frustration in finding happiness. To him, humans were more independent and had more freedom and liberty before the existence of civilization as it limits a lot of someone’s needs and desires.
In conclusion, “Civilization and Its Discontents” by Sigmund Freud was a book that sought to explain both organized religion and civilization in general. The book was largely influenced by the hostile environment of post World War I Germany and was a widely read and widely influential book.
In Civilization and Its Discontents (Ch. 2), Sigmund Freud argues that happiness is routed in two basic ideas: the first having to do with no pain and the other having to do with pleasure. Along with his idea of what the root of happiness is, he also describes multiple ways this happiness can be attained. Freud states that love and beauty are both means of achieving happiness. Although love and beauty cannot completely prevent all worldly suffering, they both offer a powerful explanation that can help an individual determine the true meaning of their life. In this presentation, we will argue that this argument succeeds because true happiness is difficult to come by in this life, but things such as love and beauty provide a basis for passionate strife in an individual, while also causing an intoxicating kind of sensation that may lead to a definite meaning to Earthly existence for a human being.
The aim of this essay is to clarify the basic principles of Freud’s theories and to raise the main issues.
According to Freud’s conclusion based on decades of experimentation and theoretical work in the field of psychotherapy, humans cannot be happy because a satisfaction of needs creates only a momentary phase of happiness which expires after some time. Therefore, the focus of life should not be obtaining happiness, and people should focus on avoiding suffering instead (Bullock, n.d.). However, several paradigms about well-being exist, and individual cognitive patterns and paradigms define the emotional responses to social influences. From an objective viewpoint, well-being is a state of consciousness that arises from a combination of internal and external factors, and money is an unstable external influence in defining subjective well-being.
Throughout Civilization and Its Discontents, Freud talks about happiness-why we don't have it and how to attain it. He blames civilization for people's general unhappiness. Civilization is obsessed with technology, figuring out how the world works, and controlling nature. This focus on and excess of technology and science may have advantages, but it also has many disadvantages, the main one being unhappiness. Civilization hinders man's instinctual drives. Man is born with these innate drives, and when he is not able to fulfill them, he becomes miserable. There are restrictions placed on the members of a society through cultural norms and beliefs. All these things put together add up to an unhappy society.
The process of society moving toward civilization affects the relationship between the society and individual. As the society and individual developing over time, these two processes seem to be further away from each other, yet the development of society restricts individual’s. This is a very controversial topic and being discussed in many literature works such as the poem,“Sunflower Sutra,” by Allen Ginsberg and the book, “Civilization and Its Discontent,” by Sigmund Freud. Both Ginsberg and Freud point out that civilization would negatively affect individual such that as civilization is forming in the society, individual starts to lose its true nature or instincts.
Part I: Replacement of power of individual by power of community constitutes the decisive step of civilization…the first requisite of civilization, therefore, is that of justice. According to Sigmund Freud, in his 1962 work Civilization and Its Development, civilization refers to the rules aimed to defending man from nature. Freud argues out that culture, a complex of symbolic meanings, is created to achieve immortality. Human beings fabricate culture, by weaving webs of significance, to reduce the anxiety and fear brought by “superior power of nature”(Freud, 28).
Sigmund Freud is psychology’s most famous figure. He is also the most controversial and influential thinkers of the twentieth century. Freud’s work and theories helped to shape out views of childhood, memory, personality, sexuality, and therapy. Time Magazine referred to him as one of the most important thinkers of the last century. While his theories have been the subject of debate and controversy, his impact on culture, psychology, and therapy is cannot be denied.