In this talk, Sherry Turkle’s arguments are shown to be very logical because she proves her points through the use of induction. Turkle first provides an example of an experience she has had with people as her “case”. From her experiences, she forms a rule or idea. An example of this is at 8:57 - Turkle says that she often hears people say, “I would rather text than talk.” From one simple statement, Turkle is able to draw from this that people are “used to getting by with less”. Moreover, Turkle provides an additional example on how lots of people have shared with her the wish of a more advanced version of Siri so that Siri will become more of a best friend figure - “someone who will listen when others won’t.” From these two statements combined, …show more content…
Overall Turkle adds, “the feeling that ‘no one is listening to me’ makes us want to spend time with machines that seem to care about us.” In terms of leaps in logic, I found that her talk is very easy to follow, and no sudden topics or points were introduced. Sherry Turkle connected and introduced her points effectively , and as a result, in my opinion, made her arguments much more understandable,
In Sherry Turkle’s TED Talk, it is evident that she relies heavily on emotional appeals. At 5:35, Turkle uses an analogy through Goldilocks to explain the connections and relationships among people. In the talk, Turkle refers to “the Goldilocks effect”, where she states, “across generations, I see that people can’t get enough of each other, if and only if
…show more content…
At 7:32, Turkle gives a personal experience of when Stephen Colbert asked her a certain question that can be considered a counterargument to her own. She states that Colbert asked, “Don’t all those little tweets, don’t all those little sips of online communication, add up to one big gulp of real conversation?” She quickly refutes the idea by remarking, “my answer is no, they don’t add up” but concedes to the idea by adding, “connecting in sips may work for gathering discreet bits of information, they may work for saying “I’m thinking about you”, or even for saying “I love you” - I mean, look at how I felt when i got that text from my daughter”, however she effectively supports her refutation by stating how “communicating in sips don’t really work in terms of learning about the other person, or getting to know and understand each other.” She mentions how we use conversations with each other to learn how to have conversations with ourselves, and how it helps us self-reflect, which is an extremely valuable skill for children in terms of development. The question Colbert asked is a question I also used to ask myself. I have friends in elementary school who are like family to me. Today, we all go to different high schools and communicate with each other through text messaging and group chats. I too, would also think that sending messages to one another would be a good way of communication. However,
In Sherry Turkle’s, New York Times article, she appeals to ethos, logos and pathos to help highlight on the importance of having conversations. Through these rhetorical devices she expresses that despite the fact that we live in a society that is filled with communication we have managed to drift away from “face to face” conversations for online connection. Turkle supports her claims by first focusing on ethos as she points out her own experiences and data she has collected. She studied the mobile connection of technologies for 15 years as well as talked to several individuals about their lives and how technology has affected them. Sherry Turkle also shows sympathy towards readers by saying “I’ve learned that the little devices most of us carry
In her article, “Lecture Me. Really”, Molly Worthen addresses the issue college students know all too well: how to lecture properly. Published in the New York Times, Worthen writes a passionate article about lecturing but from the perspective of a professor. Worthen presents the idea that lecturing, although some may think ineffective in the classroom, is a way to truly challenge and engage students into critically thinking. Worth dictates this idea with an excellent build up logical argument but lacks the proper evidence to support her claims creating a faulty argument.
Brene Brown main point about her speech is vulnerability. Her main point of this is to understand or know what he feel and to embrace that in us. We shouldn't brig ourselves down thinking that are emotions how we feel about things makes us weak. It makes us stronger and we realize how when we feel vulnerable we need to take action and defeat it. We also need to be aware that when people see that your vulnerability they can easily target you to bring you down making you feel less confident.
She argues, “Now I suggest that the culture in which they develop tempts them into narcissistic ways of relating to the world” (244). The author argues that the society in which young adults grow up, reflects on their view of the world. Growing up in a technologically advanced society, teens seem ill prepared to deal with their day to day surroundings that require social interaction. Many millennials show little interest in anything dealing in the past. Instead, they are focused on the future and the next great technological advancement. Lastly, at the end of her essay, Turkle expresses the true social issues of teens due to the abundance of technology. She claims, “teenagers who will only ‘speak’ online, who rigorously avoid face-to-face encounters, who are in text connect with their parents fifteen or twenty times a day, who deem even a telephone call ‘too much’ (243). Turkle claims that there are consequences resulting on the heavy reliance of technology. Teens only speak over text and cannot even speak on the telephone, because they are too internal. Rather than speaking externally with others, teens are quiet while only communicating with themselves and over the phone. They would rather write words, than speak them. This is creating a generation of young adults who are not comfortable in normal social
Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and Sherry Turkle’s “How Computers Change the Way We Think” both discuss the influence of technology to their own understanding and perspective. The first work by Nicholas Carr is about the impact technology has on his mind. He is skeptical about the effect it could cause in the long term of it. He gives credible facts and studies done to prove his point. While Sherry Turkle’s work gives a broad idea of the impact of technology has caused through the years. She talks about the advances in technology and how it is changing how people communicate, learn and think. In both works “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and “How Computers Change the Way We Think” the authors present
It is only human to be biased. However, the problem begins when we allow our bigotry to manifest into an obstacle that hinders us from genuinely getting to know people. Long time diversity advocate, Verna Myers, in her 2014 Ted Talk, “How to overcome our biases? Walk boldly toward them” discusses the implicit biases we may obtain when it comes to race, specifically black men and women. Myers purpose is quite like the cliché phrase “Face your fears.” Her goal is to impress upon us that we all have biases (conscious or unconscious). We just have to be aware of them and face them head on, so that problems such as racism, can be resolved. Throughout the Ted Talk, Verna Myers utilizes an admonishing yet entertaining tone in order to grasp our attention
In the21st century, Amazing changes in communication has affected interpersonal relationships. Some prefer to use technology like Facebook, Line, and Wechat to communicate with their friends rather than talking in person. Communicating with technology will make them alienated. Interpersonal relationships are also important by personal talking, which may lead to improve relationships. In her essay, “Connectivity and Its Discontents”, Sherry Turkle believes technology weakens interpersonal relationship among friends, and relatives. In “Mother Tongue”, Amy Tan claims talking with her mother and husband in a personal way can improves their relationship. Using technology to communicate will alienate and widen the distance between friends; talking
Katy Hutchison opened to viewers with two heart felt stories during her Ted Talk. In her opening, she states lots of experiences will happen in life whether it be great or bad. She believes that when it them becomes a time in one’s life where a mess happens then there’s a moral responsibility to clean up the mess no matter the means. In the process, if cleaning the problem one may realize that they’ve been standing next to the person who created the mess. In the moment of realization, you’ll begin to feel the amount of possibility. What I gained from her message was that life has its up and down. While you’re up life is great, and everything goes as for as planned. You look forward to the next day because you know it going to be great. But,
Turkle’s stance on this topic is emotionally engaging as she uses rhetoric in a very powerful approach, while also remaining unbiased. The article flows very smoothly in a beautifully structured format. The author maintains a composition that would appeal to the interest of any sort of audience. She effectively questions the reader’s views on the negative consequences technology has on social interactions. Her work is inspiring, it sheds light on the dark hole society has dug for themselves, a state of isolation through communication in the digital age; this is a wake up
In the article Turkle talks about positives and negatives so it doesn’t really focus on one aspect. Technology has a lot of pros and cons, and even the most technologically advanced person can agree with that. She starts the article with a short story about a teenage girl that depends on technology to communicate with her friends. This is also one of the main topics of her article, Turkle believes that phone calls are avoided because of the immediate need for a response. Turkle states, “The advantage of screen communication is that it is a place to reflect, retype, and edit.” (Turkle 374) During phone calls you really don’t have the advantage of taking the time to form a response whereas in texting like Turkle said you have time to think about what you’re going to say. This gives people a way to form an identity that they want others to see. A lot of shy and socially awkward people love technology because of this, it is an easier way to express the person they wish they were. Turkle writes: “It’s only on the screen that shy people open up.” (Turkle 380) Texting and emailing allow people to reveal and hide any aspect of their lives. Being behind a computer screen gives people the confidence and anonymity that they don’t have face to face or even on the phone. Turkle also mentions another teenage girl Audrey, that feels ignored by her mother because she seems
In the world today, people are constantly surrounded by technology. At any given moment, we can connect to others around the world through our phones, computers, tablets, and even our watches. With so many connections to the outside world, one would think we have gained more insight into having better relationships with the people that matter the most. Despite these connections, people are more distant to one another than ever. In the article, “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk," author Sherry Turkle details her findings on how people have stopped having real conversations and argues the loss of empathy and solitude are due to today’s technology. Turkle details compelling discoveries on how technology has changed relationships in “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk,” and her credibility is apparent through years of research and the persuasive evidence that supports her claims.
Sherry Turkle’s article in The New York Times “The Flight From Conversation”, she disputes that we need to put down the technology and rehabilitate our ability to converse with other human beings because we are replacing deep relationships with actual people for casual encounters on technology. Turkle tries to convince young and middle age individuals who are so enthralled by the technology that they are losing the ability to communicate in a public setting. Sherry Turkle unsuccessfully persuades her audience to put down the technology and engage with others in public through her strong logos appeal that overpowers her weak logos and doesn’t reliably represent herself and her research.
Although, her constant fail to back up her claims continues to hurt her overall credibility and persuasion tactics. Another example of this would be, “A 16-year-old boy who relies on texting for almost everything says almost wistfully, ““Someday, someday, but certainly not now, I’d like to learn how to have a conversation”” (Turkle pg. 2). This quote is very relevant and could have strongly supported Turkle’s main claim but, she leaves out some very crucial information. For example, my first thoughts were, “who is this 16-year-old boy? Why should we as an audience find this teenager to be a credible source? And why does what this one boy say even need to be taken seriously?” If Turkle would have first stated something along the lines of, “95% of 12-to-17-year-old in Britain have a mobile phone and 87 percent of those have smartphones” (Butler pg. 2). And then later decided to use this quote from this unknown 16-year-old boy the quote would have seemed much more relevant and given some credibility to her and the argument as well. This is true because it would have helped Turkle’s overall argument by showing a statistical number of the children who are being effected by this technology phenomenon and why it is important to try and prevent any further damage to these social
In this book Sherry Turkle studies something she thinks we as a people are losing sight of, which is face to face conversation. She explains in her book why she believes this is so important, and the consequences we will face if we continue to ignore this growing problem. Her argument about conversation stems from talking to people, face-to-face, In which she finds many of whom have difficulty doing so. Turkle Believes this is mainly because of digital technology. In today’s world people are so glued to their phones, that they loose grip on what it 's like to hold a conversation. Sherry understands this is to be because when we use digital technology as a form of communication, we only utilize one or two of our human senses.The
This demonstrates how the points that Turkle wrote about are not based on how people feel about technology but based off the effects of technology that Turkle presented to them. Basically, she interviews people that have the same stances as her; which proves that it’s not an accurate representation of how people perceives technology.