The speech was 28 minutes long and 4628 words. Reagan’s speech was somewhat easygoing. He addressed the observers as equivalent to him and inserts some humor to corroborate his focus. He was more concerned with relating to and gaining the audience’s trust instead of sounding intelligent in order to impress the audience. “But again we do some arithmetic, and we find that we're going to spend each year just on room and board for each young person we help 4,700 dollars a year. We can send them to Harvard for 2,700! Course, don't get me wrong. I'm not suggesting Harvard is the answer to juvenile delinquency.” This was Reagan’s strategy to imbed humor to relate with the group of onlookers and get some interest. He was not dry or so monotone that the general population was compelled to listen to him. He knew how to read his audience and promote his views and opinions. …show more content…
“A Time For Choosing” is a historical speech not in light of its moving words or its suggestion to take action but because of a humble and influential man with the ability to fluently and eloquently speak to the American people with a stern honesty.
Reagan’s speech was publicly reran multiple times. its value is still reflected on to this day to be one of the most effective speeches and is notable for redefining the conservative Republican party and a standout amongst the best every constructed to benefit a presidential candidate. Because this discourse was given with the motivation of convincing, instead of celebrating, or moving, there are relatively few illustrations or likenesses. However, he does use a repetitive
force. One part of the speech that has great significance and value is where Reagan was trying to make Goldwater likeable to the people by discussing everything that he has done. He recaps the expression, “this is the man who…” shadowed by an astonishing administration that Goldwater accomplished for the American individuals. This was successful on the grounds that it built up the spirit for Goldwater, and additionally utilizes emotion to assist with people acknowledging what a minding man that Goldwater is. By Reagan talking about Goldwater’s qualities, Goldwater turns out to be all the more engaging and dependable according to the general population. This section likewise utilizes a type of victimage as a saint. He implies that Goldwater gave of himself for the assistance of another person. In the last most affecting method of redundancies came as Reagan coming to the end of his speech. When Reagan finishes, he reiteration the phrase “You and I,” as he is addressing the people. This is truly a way to approach the crowd and to relate on the grounds that it sounds more like he and the audience are old friends having a discussion as opposed to a speaker teaching the audience how to think. Reagan was setting himself as equal to the viewers by saying, “you and I,” and was talking with them as acquaintances who had a choice to make. In the last most affecting type of redundancies comes as Reagan is going down his discourse. At the point when finishing, Reagan rehashes the expression "You and I," when conversing with his group of onlookers. This is truly powerful approach to relate to the crowd, on the grounds that it sounds more like companions having a discussion as opposed to a speaker teaching the general population how to think. By saying, "you and I," Reagan is setting himself on the gathering of people's level and is conversing with them as a couple of acquaintances who have a choice to make.
Eulogies are filled with deep feelings and great love. Margaret Thatcher’s eulogy for Ronald Reagan was filled with rhetorical devices that helped people feel the feelings that she poured out. Margaret Thatcher pours out her love and honor to Ronald Reagan through parallelism, repetition, and her language choice.
Reagan, Ron Jr. “Remarks by Ron Reagan, Jr., to the 2004 Democratic National Convention.” In Dynamic Argument. Ed Robert Lamm and Justin Everett. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2007. 428-30.
Politicians use many different ways to persuade the intended audience. The speech to the Berlin Wall, and the speech to the Virginia Convention were both similar in ways of impacting people and using the same form of persuasion, but different when it came to a sense of hope, time periods, and the reasoning. Reagan and Henry use different different modes of persuasion.
Politicians frequently receive negative publicity at the hand of their own use of language. Their uses of words as they relate to persuasion typically fall within one of the three dimensions of language functions, semantic or thematic. Often their persuasive language can be found to closely resemble any of these three categories simultaneously. There are many tools for analyzing persuasive symbols, many of which should be utilized when analyzing great communicators such as President Ronald Reagan. In response to the Space Shuttle Challenger explosion on January 28th, 1986 where seven brave American’s gave their lives. President Ronald Reagan made history with his famous speech, which didn’t only serve to address the great tragedy, but served as a focal point of comfort for the grieving nation. He commemorated the seven heroes who had fallen that morning in route to outer space; he expressed gratitude to NASA for their past developments and encouraged further explorations. Ronald Reagan was a great communicator, a charismatic persuader whose words delivered focus of the message through utilization of persuasive symbols. This paper aims not to be an all-inclusive guide for analyzing persuasive symbols, but will sufficiently guide the reader to be a more perceptive of persuasive language.
...ent would have presented an ineffective speech. This was not an easy task for me, because I am not a Reagan admirer; however I shed my listener bias to finally appreciate the Great Communicator in his element.
Lincoln's style in this speech was inevitably persuasive. His rhetorical strategy appeals to not only the readers senses, but to their intellectual knowledge as w...
Former Prime Minister of England, Margaret Thatcher, in her 2004 eulogy for Ronald Reagan, exemplifies both his impact and legacy on the world. Throughout her speech, Thatcher memorializes Reagan’s performance in office as well as the decisions he made as a person by illustrating their time together to the reader. By utilizing these examples, the reader can then understand Thatcher’s overall claim that Reagan was one of the most profound leaders in history; however, the impact of Thatcher’s use of diction and sentence arrangement both provoke thought in the reader and allows him or her to comprehend her message on a more sophisticated level.
This is a sophomore from Cleveland, Ohio. As a Politics and Government major and Spanish minor, she hopes to eventually become an immigration attorney. Her hobbies include traveling, reading, and participating in 5k races. Elizabeth will be presenting the speech A Time for Choosing, by Ronald Reagan. This speech was Reagan’s political debut and his endorsement of the 1964 Republican presidential nominee, Barry Goldwater. In this speech Reagan discusses why he supports Goldwater as well as the Republican Party. This is one of the most famous American political speeches because it explains the platforms of modern Conservatism.
One of the most important aspects of Reagan’s time in office was his domestic policy. He knew to have a successful presidency and create a strong, the people of the United States needed to be cared for. His first goal was to turn the economy around from the stagflation it encounter in the Carter era. Stagflation is very similar to inflation. The main difference is that inflation is the result of a quick economic growth while causes the value of money to decrease with now economic growth. To accomplish the turn around, Reagan introduce his economic policy which became known as Reaganomics. Reaganomics was based in supply side economics. This economic theory says that lowering taxes through tax cuts increases revenue by allowing more money
In his “Challenger Explosion” speech, Pres. Ronald Reagan comforts the nation in the aftermath of NASA’s Challenger Space Shuttle exploded shortly after takeoff killing all seven astronauts. In this speech, he used rhetorical devices, such as alliteration, allusion, anaphora, and euphemism to relay his feelings of sadness and grief.
There is no doubt that the when the President of the United States speaks everyone listens to what he has to say. This credibility makes the Ethos of Reagan’s Speech almost unsurpassable. As mentioned Reagan was scheduled to give a State of the Union Address to our country on the evening of January 28, 1986. Instead, he postponed it, because “the story of the day was tragedy. Here he wanted to give an upbeat speech about America moving ahead. It just didn’t fit. It seemed in congruous (Weinraub).” He showed the country that his priority is the emotions of his people by, for the first time in history, postponing on the State of the Union speech in order to discuss the current event. This strengthened the creditability of his argument immensely. He likened the astronauts to pioneers and stated in his speech that “They had a special grace, that special spirit that says, ‘Give me a challenge and I’ll meet it with joy.” With this he appeals to the spiritual side of his audience using the word grace to describe the fallen. Again, “The president concluded by attaching the nation’s sorrow to God’s grace (Ritter, 4).” He said “As they prepared for there journey and waved ...
Reagan clearly displayed his credibility through the establishment of ethos during his speech. Reagan exemplified his credibility from the beginning due to his profession. The President of the United States is a position of high honor, respect, and power in this country. His address is very credible because he was the first person to brief the nation on the events that had taken place. Reagan began by sharing some background information and stories regarding the nation’s space program which shows that he was very knowledgeable on the topic he was discussing. Reagan was also extremely invested in the space program; therefore he was capable of knowledgably speaking on behalf of the space station. At one particular point in his address, Reagan quoted a historian on the life of Sir Francis Drake saying, “He lived by the sea, died on it, and was buried in it.” He related this to the death of the astronauts by stating that they loved what they did and died doing what they loved. This use of ethos showed a sense of sophistication and that he used his authority to appropriately address the public in a suitable manner. The president had to overcome a huge restraint while writing this speech and that was to find a way to appropriately address the nation and to help calm the nation. Reagan overcame this restraint by delivering a speech that was not only appropriate, but
This is a very serious speech and Reagan wants to respect this. He starts off with establishing a relationship with the audience by thanking them for praying for him and his wife Nancy, I believe he wants for his audience to have the feeling he belongs with them and not just the President of the United States, to help get his point across, he wants everyone to feel comfortable during this time. A few jokes are given to lighten the mood before feeling the trust is in his hands. He uses a joke related to religion to
Thatcher uses repetition to provide insight into the late president’s life. In the first line, Thatcher stated, “We have lost a great president, a great American and a great man.” Thatcher used “great” three times within the line in a row to emphasize Reagan’s greatness through her own eyes. The repetition also shows that in all parts of his life he was “great.” By using
This speech is the Presidential debate which took place in New York in the University of Hofstra on September 26th 2016. In this speech I will be analyzing Hilary Clinton.