If you had the chance to kill your greatest enemy, would you? Because In Lather and Nothing Else by Hernando Tellez, the barber has to answer that exact question-- on whether or not to kill a man who is responsible for the deaths on many fighting for his cause. In the end, the barber made the right decision not to kill Torres because it was not his job to kill him, but instead to shave him.
The barber had the power to kill who was perhaps his greatest enemy, but he chose not to which was the right decision because he was a barber and not a murder. Though he was a revolutionary, his primary job was to shave people and so he chose right in doing so. As he even said “You are an executioner; I am only a barber. Each one to his job. That’s
it. Each one to his job.” (Tellez) it shows that he values his career as a barber more than a revolutionary. Since that job has greater value to him, he felt it made logical sense that he should put his primary work (shaving Torres) before his other work (killing Torres.) You can also justify his decision to spare Torres by considering that he came into get a shave and not to battle to the death. As the barber put it, “You came in to be shaved. And I do my work honorably.” (Tellez) If the barber had indeed murdered Torres, it would have been cowardly since he would done so without Torres having the ability to fight back. It would have been unjust and wrong. While the barber had the ability to kill Torres and good reason, he made the right decision in not doing so. Killing him would have been unjust since Torres came to get a shave and would have changed the his reputation from "barber" to "murder." If he had, his legacy would have been "the killer of Torres" instead "The best barber the town ever had." And knowing how proud he was of his job, it's logical that he chose to stay the best barber ever.
Martinez’s logic is established throughout the article. She appeals to the reader’s sense of self and indignation. Most of us do not like to be talked down to. She persuades the reader to think about what it would feel like to
... under any immediate danger (Téllez). Even though Captain Torres is very close to the barber, he is in a position of disadvantage because he is disarmed and he is retrained by the sheet that the barber put on him (Téllez). The proximity of the killer to their victim creates circumstances in which forces one to kill or allows one to not kill.
The story is about Sixto, a peace-loving Spanish poet. Lino, a local gang member and drug dealer, rapes Sixto’s sister, Mandy. Sixto discusses the situation with his roommate, Willie. If Sixto retaliates, he will lose his peaceful soul and any reason for living. He feels if he does not retaliate, he might as well be dead.
Throughout an individual’s life-time, he/she has a vision as o what his/her should be. But when things do not go as planned and the unexpected occurs, does that person face it, or run away? In “An Act of Vengeance” by Isabel Allende, running away is not an option at well. Through the usage of plot, character and irony, Allende illustrates the cost of war.
In Hector Tobar’s The Tattooed Soldier, Antonio migrated from Guatemala saw Longoria in the L.A. who killed Elena and Carlitos, who are Antonio’s spouse and son. People lived in Los Angles were frustrated with the government and power system at the time. Consequently, Antonio got revenge against Longoria for Antonio’s family, others who were murdered by Longoria in Guatemala, and his justice. Justice is based on an absolute human right: the right to life, and whatever violates that right is unjust. If the power system is allowed to violate vulnerable people, the weak have a choice to use violence to attempt to reveal the responsibility of those who abused power.
Julius Caesar (100-44 BC) was one of the most outstanding leaders in history. He was the first ruler of the Romano-Hellenic civilization and achieved his goals with great success throughout his life of 56 years. He was assassinated by the conspirators, who accused him for practicing tyranny. This essay will discuss whether it was right for the conspirators to murder Caesar and what its consequences were.
Tell them not to kill me!, by Juan Rulfo, is an interesting work of fiction that addresses mainly selfishness and the realities of a self-centered life, and empathy. (Transition, have to text friend.) Many scenes in this short story portray this theme of selfishness, but few show it better than the very first scene in which Juan Rulfo describes the protagonist, Juvencio, begging his son, Justino, to put himself in harm's way to save his own life, with no thoughts of the safety of his son or his son's family. There are also quite a few scenes in this story that portray the theme of empathy. One of the scenes that shows this best is when Juvencio thinks about the crime he committed, and shows how much of a lack of empathy he feels for any human life other than his own. Another scene that shows this well is the scene in which Juvencio talks about his crime with such lack of empathy for any other people and only trying to justify it shows a total lack of caring for any other human life but his own. Another scene that shows Juan Rulfo’s theme of empathy is the scene in which Don Lupe’s son orders that Juvencio be killed. Tell them not to kill me! is about selfishness and the realities of living a self-centered life, and empathy.
With assertive shouts and short tempers, the prominent character, Ricardo, is characterized as a feisty townsman, doing nothing except trying to protect his town and its members from the judgments of the western world. For example, the characterization of the “‘…quaint’” man is exemplified through the simplicity of his life and the fact that he is “‘…employed’” and is full of knowledge, not a “‘cow in the forest’” (55, 29, 32). Ricardo desperately wants to establish the notion that he is not a heartless, feebleminded man, only an indigent, simple man striving to protect his friends and family from the criticisms of callous cultures. Incessantly Ricardo attempts to make it clear to the photographer the irritation elicited by his prese...
In conclusion, through its plot, characterization, and rhetorical devices such as tone, George Washington Gomez is an anti-corrido. However, it must be said that perhaps in its purpose as an anti-corrido, the novel is a corrido. In telling the story of Guánlito, the anti-hero of the Mexicotexans, perhaps Paredes is singing the readers his own border ballad, an ironic, cautionary tale to the Chicanos to remember who they are and where they came from and to resist, always, as a corrido hero would.
To begin, Romano, Benjamín’s rival symbolizes the corruption present within the Argentinean judicial system. In attempting to quickly close Liliana Coloto’s case, he frames two innocent laborers and orders that they be beaten (Campanella, The Secret in Their Eyes). Romano believes himself above the law and perpetuates a cycle of injustice and violence throughout the film. S...
The word barber is derived from the Latin word barba, meaning beard.2 As a profession, barbering was introduced in Rome in 296 B.C. The barbers of the early days were also surgeons and dentists, and in both Egypt and Greece, barbers attained prosperity and respect. Statesmen, poets, and philosophers who came to have their hair cut or their beards trimmed frequented the shops. They also came to discuss the news of the day because the barbershops of the ancient world were the headquarters of social, political, and sporting news.
When brought to the call of avenging their father's deaths, Laertes is fast to act, he is wants revenge and he wants ...
“The Shampoo” by Elizabeth Bishop was written near the beginning of Bishop’s residence in Brazil and is a direct homage to her lover Lota. Even though Lota is not directly addressed in the poem, an earlier draft of the poem reveals a connection to her longtime lover. Bishop uses the mundane act of washing a loved one’s hair as the basis for a brilliant meditation on the nature and progression of time. In “The Shampoo” Elizabeth Bishop uses imagery of nature, metaphor of time, and deliberate diction to compare the gradual movements in nature over time with the process of aging. Bishop draws a contrast between the process of aging and the timeless relationship she has with
...ou, Cruel! been content to seize Hairs less in sight, or any Hairs but these!" (IV, 175-176)
Pablo is ruthless in executing the local fascist police in Ronda. As he prepares to shoot one man in the head, Pablo says, "And you are an ugly thing, you murderer of peasants. You who would shoot your own mother" (Hemingway 112). Later that morning, Pablo remains stoically brutal as he prepares to send the fascists out of the city hall to face the angry crowd outside. The fascists are with a priest, and they pray with him before they are sent to their death. Pablo's wife describes how Pablo acts towards these men, and she says,