Analysis Of Land Use Graphs

863 Words2 Pages

Land Use Graphs Bar Graphs The graphs show the results that were expected from the land use questionnaires. In the tables, the trend in the graphs show the total’s and average’s over 147 years. Rapidly changing human activity within the Stratford since 1867 to this present day puts huge pressures on the natural environment's ability to adapt and change. These may be further complicated by the influences of climate change, such as extremes in weather. These bar graphs above show the changes in land use over one hundred and forty seven years. Maintaining a balance between urban development and natural systems is essential to ensure that, for example, soils are still able to buffer potential contaminants or that ground stability is sustainable for buildings and infrastructure. The land in 1867 was mostly being used for agricultural as farming was key to the primary industry. In 1916 the residential business has increased rapidly as an increase in human activity has resulted in a need for new homes. Then in this present day the industrial industry took a rapid boost as machinery was needed to provide a safe, efficient transport link (hub) for civilians. Land Use Graphs Line Graphs The graph shows the results that were expected from the land use questionnaire. In the tables, the trend in the graphs show the total’s and average’s over 147 years. This graph show the work on the previous page put into a different perspective; to show the trends and tolls each land use has taken over 147 years. As each industry has increased and decreased; the line graphs above show where the industries were in three different points over 147 years. The Burgess theory The Burgess... ... middle of paper ... ...ties, eminently in Europe, did not at all followed the concentric circles model. For instance, in most pre-industrial European cities, the centre was much more consequential than the periphery, eminently in terms of convivial status. The Burgess concentric model is consequently partially inverted. • There were an abundance of spatial differences in terms of ethnic, convivial and occupational status, while there were low occurrences of the functional differences in land use patterns. The concentric model postulated a spatial disunion of place of work and place of residence, which was not generalized until the twentieth century. However, the Burgess model remains utilizable as a concept explicating concentric urban development, as a way to introduce the involution of urban land use and to explicate urban magnification in American cities in the early-mid 20th century.

Open Document