Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Morality in christianity essay
Morality and the beliefs of god
Essay on morality, sin and christianity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Kierkegaard’s two works “You Shall Love” and “Our Duty to Love the People We See,” we are introduced with a moral responsibility towards others since the start. In “You Shall Love,” we are provided with the second commandment: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself” (17) whereas in the other reading we are provided with a biblical excerpt stating how we cannot claim to love God while hating our brother. It is by providing this biblical references that Kierkegaard reveals how, despite that they are commanded to us by God, we hold a moral responsibility towards our neighbor by serving, loving, and caring for them.
In addition, in Kierkegaard’s “Practice in Christianity,” we are given the distinction between an imitator (a true Christian)
…show more content…
As many people will agree, Christ can be referred to, as Kierkegaard’s states it, “the prototype” (239). In other words, Christ lived in such an ethical and loving way that many people admire. Therefore, we can safely say that in following Christ’s “footprints” (238), we are closer to being more ethical and loving individuals. Consequently, in becoming involved with this service-learning project, I have come to realize that I, and everyone in general, do hold a moral responsibility towards complete strangers. This is most evident when regarding our religious background since I, and anyone else for that matter, cannot truly claim to being an ethical individual if we are stuck being admirers and do not alter in becoming imitators.
This service-learning project has not only to better understand Kierkegaard’s philosophy but also Mill’s and Aristotle’s theories regarding ethics and virtue. For example, Aristotle reveals that a human being’s telos is eudaimonia (happiness). However, in order to achieve this we must practice virtue since it “comes into being as a consequence of habit” (21). Nonetheless, at the beginning of practicing virtue it will be unpleasant. Only through habit will a person become virtuous and eventually derive pleasure form such
…show more content…
After this experience, I have not only been able to become better person, but also have come to understand that I do hold a moral responsibility towards complete strangers. As noted by Kierkegaard, if I wish to live a good life and call myself a Christian, I must transition from the default setting of being an admirer to being an imitator. By imitating, more specifically, by serving and loving the people around me, I am now closer to being a true Christian. In addition, although the motive behind actions may not be that of good will, if they promote happiness, and I transform them into habit, they may eventually shift into something of moral worth. In other words, if we practice virtue and if we aim at the greatest happiness principle we are closer to being a person of virtue, an ethical person despite that our initial motive was not that of a good
The Nicomachean Ethics, written by Aristotle, represents his most important contribution within the field of Ethics; it is a collection of ten books, covering a variety of interesting topics, throughout the collection. Aristotle tries to draw a general understanding of the human good, exploring the causes of human actions, trying to identify the most common ultimate purpose of human actions. Indeed, Aristotelian’s ethics, also investigates through the psychological and the spiritual realms of human beings. Without pretending to exhaust with too many references, it would be rather useful to focus on the most criticized part of the philosopher’s attempt, which is also the very starting point of his masterpiece, identified as eudaimonia (happiness, well being) and ergon (function), in Aristotelian terms.
Hursthouse, R. (2003, July 18). Virtue Ethics. Stanford University. Retrieved March 6, 2014, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/ethics-virtue
How does the individual assure himself that he is justified? In Soren Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling, Abraham, found in a paradox between two ethical duties, is confronted with this question. He has ethical duties to be faithful to God and also to his son, Isaac. He believes that God demands him to sacrifice Isaac. But, Abraham, firmly adhering to his faith, submitted to what he believed was the will of God. By using his perspective and that of his alternative guise, Johannes de Silentio, Kierkegaard concentrates on the story of Abraham in such a way that his audience must choose between two extremes. Either Abraham is insane or he is justified in saying he will kill Isaac.
At some point in our lives we all question our reason for being here in His Kingdom and what our role needs to be, and Wright suggests finding virtue and joy will lead us to a positive transformation of character, in order to better serve in our Lord’s Kingdom. Questioning “Why Christian Character Matters” is more than just a religious idea, it is also a moral effort and predicament, at times. The issue of traditional morality arose in this book, encouraging Christians to escape their morally corrupt minds and find the real joy and meaning behind being a Christian, rather than stealing from your friends and family and committing
Practice in Christianity, written by the pseudonym[1] of Anti-Climacus, describes the ideal Christian life from the perspective of the ideal Christian. ‘Anti-’ in the sense of ‘Anti-Climacus’ is not an indication of opposition (to Climacus, the ‘devoutly non-Christian’ ethicist and editor of Either/Or whose esthetic sense was particularly keen). Rather, “Anti-” is an older form of “ante”, meaning ‘before’ both in the sense of time and in the sense of rank. Anti-Climacus is the perfect Christian; this was useful to Kierkegaard, who could not claim that distinction for himself. Practice in Christianity deals harshly with the Church’s homogenization of Christianity by removing its “offensiveness.” This paper will examine and analyze several passages from Practice in Christianity, draw parallels between the inoffensive Church of Denmark in the mid-19th century and both the charismatic and “High-Church”[2] traditions of worship in the United States today, and suggest criteria for sincere, “offensive” worship in an organized church.
We are commanded by God himself to “ Love thy neighbor as thyself”. Everyone on Earth is everyone else 's neighbor, therefore commanding everyone to love even the bitterest of enemies. Take into account the parable of the good samaritan. A Jew(Henry,753) was walking down a road and was ambushed by robbers who took all his belongings and beat him half to death, leaving him on the side of the road to die. Two men who were considered amongst the most righteous in their cities passed by the dying man. However, a samaritan, who was a sworn enemy of the Jews(Henry, 753), stopped and gave the man medical attention using expensive wines and oils on the man’s wounds. The samaritan then put him on his own donkey and brought him to an inn, and left two day’s worth of pay with the innkeeper to use to take care of the man(“Good”). This samaritan had no reason to help, in fact it would have been acceptable if he simply finished the man off, for they were bitter enemies. However, the samaritan man had love in his heart and obeyed the commands of moral law even though he had no reason to and couldn’t afford to either. What we can learn from the good samaritan is that doing the right thing often corresponds with moral law, and that intervention falls within the definition of the right thing to
Our human identity can be found in either condition: dead in sin, or alive in Christ. Paul m...
It has also been shown that these codex encompass many of the biblical values Christians are expected to posses. A unique observation can be made when about the teachings of the Bible and the intent of the codex. Repeatedly the command to love your neighbor as yourself supported the objective of the codex principle. This supports the validity that Christian ethics are still applicable in today’s industry and should be the foundation of all our ethical decisions.
Christianity propagated charity as one of the necessary acts that a good Christian should follow. Graham Gordon believes that in Christianity, "Charity is considered chief of the Christian virtues," and that "Charity is commended by St. Paul for being the true way to the end which religious practices seek"(10). We can see that in being a chief virtue, charity is highly encouraged in the sense that helping others is considered to be a great deed of good doing. Therefore, we can draw the notion that those who wish to follow the "true way to the end," are those that contribute the most to the poor, as opposed to those mentioned by Walsh who see themselves as "not responsible for the welfare of human beings.
The connections between Ludwig Wittgenstein and Soren Kierkegaard as philosophers are not at all immediately obvious. On the surface, Wittgenstein deals with matters concerning the incorrect use of philosophical language and Kierkegaard focuses almost exclusively on answering the question 'how to become a Christian'. But this account belies deeper structural similarities between these men's important works. Thus, this paper suggests that their methods, rather than exclusively content, contain a strong parallel on which a natural and hopefully fruitful examination of their work can be based.
Aristotle’s thoughts on ethics conclude that all humans must have a purpose in life in order to be happy. I believe that some of the basics of his ideas still hold true today. This essay points out some of those ideas.
A simple act of love towards another human being can change their entire life. “The Father loved him before the creation of the world, and the reason the father sends him is so that the Father 's love for him might be in others also.” (Reeves 2012) In context, he is talking about The Father (God) loving and sending him (Jesus) to spread the love of God throughout the world. Jesus did this noble duty through showing kindness to all, regardless of social class, race, stature, gender, or past sins. The Bible calls us to “Be imitators of God” in Ephesians 5:1. As we learned in the first part of this course, if we imitate God, we are imitating Jesus as well.
Throughout part one of Works of Love in the chapter “Our Duty to be in the Debt of Love to Each Other” he still continues to look into the Christian ways for works of love but now having a contrast on love to envy. Kierkegaard comes to say that true love and true lover are in in an infinite debt with God. Is repeated a couple times that God is love and love comes from God. Kierkegaard came up with the concept that Christian love is an interruption of self-denial. This means to give up your selfish desires or ways in order to be appreciated and loved in a righteous way. Kierkegaard then here puts out the cautions to becoming a Christian under a false impression of what is Christianity. He explains how many Christians now don’t really understand
The history of my ethical background developed early in my childhood by my parents, grandparents, school and society. I grew up in a Christian based home where my parents and grandparents used the teachings in the bible to shape my moral and ethical decision-making process. My moral philosophy is rooted from the verse Matthew 7:12, which, states, “do to others whatever you would like them to do to you”, also known as the “Golden Rule”. (Book of Matthew, 2004). My grandparents lived by this statement every day and it is through their daily interactions with members of society that provided me with a living example on the significance of living by this rule. My grandparents never met a stranger and the “Golden Rule” always applied to their interactions with people regardless of age, sex, race or religion and ultimately led many individuals to accept Jesus Christ into their lives. A recent experience at the United States Military Academy tested my personnel stance in the “Golden Rule” by conducting marriage counseling for the Army Married Couples Program on two female cadets recently engaged for marriage following graduation. All three
The Christian should live according to the law of God as he is empowered by the Holy Spirit; the non-Christian lives according to his flesh, that is, according to his own free will, his sinful self, for he does not have the Holy Spirit indwelling him. It has been said that if we set our minds on the flesh it will lead us to death, but to put our minds on the spirit will give us life and peace (Rom 8:4). God gave His son in the likeness of us to rid us of our sinful state, so that the righteous requirements might be accomplished in us by living by the spirit of God. However, those who have a carnal mentality can’t satisfy God, because a mind...