Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on death culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Ken Murray's essay, "How Doctors Die", the author discusses and informs the reader about how the seemingly unusual way doctors spend the last few months or so of their lives compared to the rest of America. Murray informs the reader about how truly different they handle the situation. ”What’s unusual about them (doctors) is not how much treatment they get compared to most Americans, but how little.” This just shows how most people, when they find out they have a life threatening illness or disorder, will ask for whatever is possible to be done so that they may live. But for when doctors in most cases first learn of a life threatening issue they have, they just accept it. They do not ask for the most extreme measures to be taken, …show more content…
if any. They do not say they'll do whatever it takes to get better. And they do not say that they just want to live, no matter what. Doctors react this way because they know enough about modern care and medicine that they know just what their limits and negative side effects are. They would rather live a much happier and peaceful few months than live for 10 years in a hospital bed. Along with that 10 years of suffering would be countless surgeries and medications, which more often than not increase and prolong the pain and suffering. Doctors have to watch countless patients face the facts instead of keeping hope that the very unrealistic expectations they have will work completely successfully.
They have to watch families and friends beg for whatever it takes to work, and even then, if doctors could actually do these things, there is a small chance it would work. Some doctors have medallions on them selves that say "no code”, which means that if something were to happen to them, they would not want anyone to try and preform CPR because they believe it is simply not worth it. "They want to make sure, when the time comes, that no heroic measures will happen - that they will never have to experience, during their last few moments on earth, someone breaking their ribs in an attempt to resuscitate them with CPR.” The author says this to show what doctors are willing to do to make sure the they do not have their last moments in this world to be agonizing and, that when they do die, it is peaceful. Not painful or stressful. This really helps Murray’s big point on how doctors will not take the long and painful way out, but the short and calm one. Also, when Murray is talking about the “no code” medallions, he uses imagery to help the reader picture what it looks like on doctors. “Some medical personnel wear medallions stamped “no code” to tell physicians not to preform CPR on them. I have even seen it as a tattoo.” When he talks about the medallions and tattoo he has seen throughout his career of the
simple phrase “no code”, he uses imagery in his writing to help prove his point and make sure the reader understands it. And even though it is just a simple phrase, it really goes to show that it goes a long way. This essay strongly relates to me because my aunt is a doctor. And, not only does she always talk about how much she would never ever want to be put on life support if anything ever lead to that, and she also has a "no code" medallion. She knows it would only lead to suffering for her and whomever attempts to resuscitate her. My aunt knows what she will do in a time of distress related to anything medical. She has said that she would like it to be calming and peaceful, no one breaking their back only for her to live a little longer in pain. She would like to be surrounded by her loved ones and just be happy and smile for her very last moments on earth.
I often ask myself, “Can I handle it?” I learned from other doctors that in order to provide the best care, a physician must be able to detach himself or herself from the patient; they say it would be better for both the doctor and the patient. But, with that kind of thinking, the doctor is not fully giving himself to the patient. So, is it right to not fully give oneself to care for the patient? Learning from Patrick Dismuke and those who loved him, it seemed that the hospital was able to care for him best by loving him. Nurse Kay, Patrick’s favorite nurse, not only answered his late night calls, but enjoyed talking with him. This always calmed Patrick down before and/or after surgery. Dr. Aceves was always optimistic and hopeful for the future of Patrick’s health, never giving up on him by pushing for surgery. He did this because he knew Patrick all 16 years and was emotionally attached to the boy, even though Patrick did not feel the same way. Thus, though I can understand that a physician must put a wall between himself or herself and the patient, there should still be a strong connection in which they would do anything for the patient’s comfort and
The one example of this that I found most relevant in the book is the situation of Armando. Armando was shot and the bullet lodged in the spinal canal. It caused enough damage to make him a paraplegic, but not enough to kill him. The ethics committee had decided that it was best to encompass a DNR because he had no health insurance, and his quality of life was not what it was before. When the doctors went to approve this with Armando, he denied the DNR and said that he wanted what ever was necessary to be done to him to save his life (Belkin p. 58-59). This made Cindy worried for the cost of keeping him alive was substantial. All the doctors and caretakers believed that he should be placed under DNR, however that was not what Armando wanted. The doctors believed that was the wrong decision. This correlates to what the quote was from the book on page 70; doctors can tend to be narrow-minded when it comes to the care of a patient. They believe that their course of action is the best and do not agree if the patient wants something different. This I have found is also true in my own personal experience with doctors. For example, when I was about 17 my wisdom teeth were growing in. I was in terrible pan from two of my wisdom teeth being impacted. My
During the time of chaos and confusion, doctors are expected to find the best solution for the patients. As a consequence, the staff chooses to kill the patients “calmly” to reduced the factors that puts a strain on themselves and on the patients. Doctor Cook never once said that they chose the very last option possible, because if that was the case, the doctors would have made a call for additional volunteer recusers until conformation that no rescuers and no outside assistants were left to assure that the patients in the category five condition have a fair chance of survival. Often times, a hospital can testify that most patients have had harsher conditions that put them at near death, but after care and time, those patients have had speedy recoveries and went on to live normal lives. The doctors were in observation that the patients were suffering. Pou agreed that she administered the drugs to prevent another terrible day for the patients. Cook agreed that the drugs killed the patients by stopping their respiration system. They assumed that the patients were going to a better place. A modern christian would believe that the doctors did not take in consideration the state of the soul. Meaning, the person may not have been in a state where they went to heaven, therefore the doctors sent them to a place of deeper misery. The doctors handled the situation in the interest of the staff but not in the best interest of the patients or the patients
While the majority of the book critiques the healthcare system, Chapter 13 focuses more on key actions and personality traits that help Dr. Stone relate to patients. Although this noteworthy, compassionate physician attempts to develop an understanding of his patients’ values and goals, he still fails Mrs. Jackson by trying to retain cultural competency by tiptoeing around end-of-life decisions. Conversations about feeding tube placement and DNR orders could have minimized Mrs. Jackson’s unnecessary
“In quixotically trying to conquer death doctors all too frequently do no good for their patients’ “ease” but at the same time they do harm instead by prolonguing and even magnifying patients’ dis-ease.”
For countless years there has always been an urgent need for doctors. Different methods would be used to cure people from their sicknesses. However, life is given by God and it is he who can take it away. Doctors play the role of saving lives, but in the end, they are powerless because nature has to take its course leaving humanity at its limits. In Vincent Lams novel “Bloodletting and Miraculous Cures”, Lam challenges the myth that doctors are omnipotent by contending that “medicine is a science of uncertainty and an art of probability”. Using Fitzgerald as a focal point, Lam debunks the myth that doctors are omnipotent through situations of medical failure, having a loss of power and control and by inhabiting deadly diseases. By showings his mistakes, Lam proves that Fitz is not perfect and God like.
Before, there were no breakthroughs with the opportunity of saving lives. Innovations in medical technology made contributions to correct abnormal heartbeats and save lives by using a defibrillator and modern respirator. Who would know that the rapid discoveries would include successfully giving patients surgical transplants? Furthermore, President Lyndon Johnson implemented an executive policy requiring the usage of medical response trauma teams. Since 1976, this executive order has allowed the widespread use of CPR, and organizations like the American Red Cross and the American Heart Association were founded. “About 6.4 million people now survive angina chest pain each year, while an additional 700,000 people survive a heart attack each year (pg. 15 of Last Rights) Despite these remarkable breakthroughs that help those badly injured, the law becomes vague and allows more opportunities for misinterpretation on defining death. As a result, this could be advantageously used against the best interest of others and the government. “This ten-year mishmash of laws is what led the previously mentioned President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, established by an act of Congress in 1978 , to tackle the first task of defining death.” (pg. 81). The President’s Commission forced the U.S Supreme Court and
In the Victorian Britain there was 88 minors were killed from the start of 1851 to the end of 1851 from many, many different things. I am talking about deaths in Victorian Britain and what I think the deaths mean is that the people who died, died cruelly. There may be some people who die of accidental deaths but most people die of a cruel death. The Victorians viewed death as a sad time because the deaths caused a great deal of sadness and pain to the person's family mates and friends.
When it comes to a bad diagnosis it is often difficult for doctors to tell their patients this devastating news. The doctor will likely hold back from telling the patient the whole truth about their health because they believe the patient will become depressed. However, Schwartz argues that telling the patient the whole truth about their illness will cause depression and anxiety, but rather telling the patient the whole truth will empower and motivate the patient to make the most of their days. Many doctors will often also prescribe or offer treatment that will likely not help their health, but the doctors do so to make patients feel as though their may be a solution to the problem as they are unaware to the limited number of days they may have left. In comparison, people who are aware there is no cure to their diagnosis and many choose to live their last days not in the hospital or pain free from medications without a treatment holding them back. They can choose to live their last days with their family and will have more time and awareness to handle a will. Schwartz argues the importance of telling patients the truth about their diagnosis and communicating the person’s likely amount of time left as it will affect how the patient chooses to live their limited
In “How Doctors Die,” Dr. Ken Murray explains some different real stories about people having terminal diseases, and how their doctors and physicians treat them. Moreover, the author mentions about difficult decisions that not only the doctors but patients and the patients’ family also have to choose. When the patients’ diseases become critical, the doctors have to do whatever they can to help the patients, such as surgical treatment, chemotherapy, or radiation, but they cannot help the patients in some cases. In additions, doctors still die by critical diseases, too. Although they are doctors, they are just normal people and cannot resist all of the diseases. Like other patients, the doctors having critical diseases want to live instead of
Unnoticed by the mainstream press, a disturbing study published in the Fall 2000 issue of the Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics reveals how far the futile-care movement, in reality the opening salvo in a planned campaign among medical elites to impose health-care rationing upon us, has already advanced. The authors reviewed futility policies currently in effect in 26 California hospitals. Of these, only one policy provided that "doctors should act to support the patient's life" when life-extending care is wanted. All but two of the hospital policies defined circumstances in which treatments should be considered nonobligatory even if requested by the patient or patient representative. In other words, 24 of the 26 hospitals permit doctors to unilaterally deny wanted life-supporting care.
This paper will address some of the more popular points of interest involved with the euthanasia-assisted suicide discussion. There are less than a dozen questions which would come to mind in the case of the average individual who has a mild interest in this debate, and the following essay presents information which would satisfy that individual's curiosity on these points of common interest.
I personally feel that the life of a person is well above all policies and regulations and if an attempt to rescue him or her from death at the right time remains unfulfilled, it is not the failure of a doctor or nurse, it is the failure of the entire medical and health community.
Some people believe that doctors should not have the right to tell their patients that they have a condition that cannot be cured, and that they have a certain amount to live.Doctors should tell their patients because what if you will never know that the last few moments they have to live their lives they wanna do something with it.
The doctor patient relationship is an important connection. Doctor-patient confidentiality is based on the idea that a person should not care for medical treatment because they fear the state will share with others.