Analysis Of Hutchinson's Essay 'Compassionate' Killing Is Wrong

1497 Words3 Pages

In the article, “Even “Compassionate” Killing Is Wrong,” Eric Hutchinson directly ties philosophical teachings to new legislation surrounding healthcare in Canada. He offers a critical examination of the ethical implications of expanding assisted suicide to include the mentally ill. By analyzing the works of philosophers such as Cicero and Augustine, Hutchinson offers insight into the moral landscape surrounding end-of-life decisions. He uses this analysis to argue against the idea of compassion as justification for including mentally ill individuals in physician-assisted suicide. In March 2023, Canadian legislation added mentally ill individuals to those who could receive assisted suicide care. Hutchinson begins his paper by addressing the Canadian government's rationale behind this proposed expansion, namely, the …show more content…

According to Cicero, while certain forms of suicide, like those deemed honorable, might be permissible, all instances ultimately amount to the unjust killing of an innocent person. Hutchinson extends this argument by incorporating Augustine's theological perspective, which prohibits suicide based on moral laws outlined in the Ten Commandments. By blending these philosophical and theological viewpoints, Hutchinson argues against the ethical validity of assisted suicide, asserting that it contradicts fundamental principles of justice and the sanctity of life. To support his argument that compassion is not justification for expanding the reach of assisted suicide, Hutchinson makes several arguments. My interpretation of his main argument is as follows: 1. The Canadian government is expanding assisted suicide to include the mentally ill, under the guise of compassion and a desire to alleviate suffering. 2. What is the difference between a'smart' and

Open Document