Analysis Of Francis Chan's Forgotten God

759 Words2 Pages

Journal Week Eight As I read through our assigned chapters this week, I couldn 't help but think about what could have been. What if the nation of Israel (and Judah later on) would have truly followed after God? What if they would have submitted to His divine kingship, instead of the fallacious leadings of men? What if the children of the Lord would have "inclined their hearts" to His words, and not devoted themselves to forbidden idolatry? Time and time again, the choosen nation of Israel turned from God and His words. As a result, they wound themselves up into a whole multitude of issues. In their sin, they were consistently raided, enslaved, and butchered by other nations. If only they would have devoted their hearts, souls, and strength to God, they would have had rest in a peaceful land. The Israelites can serve as a great example to us that God 's way is alsways best, not matter how things appear to us. Also, I remember one particularily riveting passage that I read in Francis Chan 's "Forgotten God" that pertains to a popular story we read in 1 Kings. In Chan 's book, he draws a comparison between the prophets of Baal that Elijah faced on Mount Caramel and the modern church of today. Chan said that many times, like the pagans in the story, Christians …show more content…

There several passages that I have found in my ESV Bibles over the years that contain the following disclaimer before the ensuing verses: [SOME OF THE EARLIEST MANUSCRIPTS DO NOT INCLUDE (said chapter): (said verses)] One of the most predominant examples of this is the story of the adulterous woman brought before Jesus by the pharasees in John chapter 8. My question is, should pastors preach on these debated passages from the pulpit? Even if you believe that these verses are a part of the "true" Biblical Canon, would it be better to avoid teaching from them to steer clear from dispute? It 's a deep and interesting

Open Document