Analysis Of Eisenhower Atoms For Peace Speech

2072 Words5 Pages

moral blame for the armaments race, and possibly war, is clearly on the Russians."(Medhurst 20) The rhetoric of the speech put the Soviet Union in a horrible position. Due to the careful development of the speech and the vast amount of time developing the correct language there was no right answer for the soviets. The United States created a perfect speech to put the Soviet Union at a huge disadvantage. The next most important part of the speech is the analyst of the text used and how the speech is organized. Typically, Most speeches occur in the order of past, present, and future. However, Eisenhower decides to break the traditional standard rules and he decides to take a different route and begin with the present. One theory on why Eisenhower …show more content…

In the opening statement of the speech Eisenhower asserts that it would not be "a measure of this great opportunity merely to recite, however hopefully, pious platitudes. ' ' He realizes, he says, "that if a danger exists in the world, it is a danger shared by all—and equally, that if hope exists in the mind of one nation, that hope should be shared by all."(Eisenhower Atoms for Peace). As explained in the paragraph before instead of talking about the past use of atomic energy Eisenhower jumps right into the present. Eisenhower describes to the audience the new way of war, which is atomic warfare. Eisenhower gets so much respect, and people pay attention to what he says in the speech because he was a general before he became president. Eisenhower knows the ways of war so he can be accurate in describing how war during his presidency would be fought. In order to intimidate the Russians with the power of the United States atomic weapons, he could not speak like a general but instead a president. The president must speak of peace and not war while also conveying the strength of his or her country. The president does this in his speech by conveying an underlying message that the Soviet Union should seriously reconsider any nuclear threat against the United States because we were going to retaliate in two-fold. The president …show more content…

Many will argue that the speech was, in fact, the first step towards nuclear disarmament while others will argue that the speech was totally devised to intimidate the Soviet Union. The speech came from a bunch of different angles warning of nuclear war and the end of mankind as we know it along with the use of nuclear weapons to prevent war. The purpose of the speech was to position the United States against the soviet Union in terms of peaceful uses of atomic energy. The speech was devised in such a way where not only would the United States adopt peaceful uses of atomic energy but so would the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was pressured by the speech to favor in terms with the United States. The speech was an American win all the way because no matter the Russian response the Americans were going to seem favorable. The speech gave Eisenhower the chance of turning the atomic weapons into things for peace and prosperity. The speech was shared with the world to propose the idea of peaceful negotiations between all countries with atomic capabilities. But, the speech was dialog between the United States and Soviet Union in the hopes that each country could either eliminate nuclear weapons or regulate them. Eisenhower found the way to accomplish all his goals from the speech by implicitly and explicitly targeting the Soviet Union throughout the entire speech. Eisenhower

Open Document