Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of the modern age on society at large
Psychology in your life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of the modern age on society at large
In this age Psychology underwent various changes in order to adapt to the ever-changing ways of society. Multiple reading materials throughout time started to focus more on the mind and psychological aspects of the human race. Each individual has the ability to react different in any given situations. A powerful example within the psychological community is a reading called “Dibs in Search of Self”. The reading was narrative produced in 1964 by Virginia Axline. The narrative is centered on the character not officially being diagnosed properly. The main character Dibs is described as possibly mentally retarded, brain damaged, or suffering from autism. Axline, produced the reading to be a definitive text on play therapy, frames her account in a familiar psychoanalytic trajectory, as the search for a sense of independent selfhood and human dignity. Throughout the reading Dibs is suffering from severe emotional deprivation. The deprivation was caused by the lack of attention his parents gave him. Dibs were an unwanted child, whose mother perceived him as the cause of her failed career. In reality, Dibs had no chance to grow and survive in a hard fought society. The thoughts of his mother hindered her son before birth. Thoughts of a human have more power than humans can imagine. Continuous thoughts of anything weather negative or positive will formulate in this current realm.
The universe cannot deliberate determine negative or positive. The two notions are more of a choice rather than scientific laws. When Axline introduced Dibs, he was passive and was unable to connect affectively or to express his needs and desires. Axline described her first visit to the Dibs residents as a sterile environment. Even with the fam...
... middle of paper ...
...s brilliant scientist and never wanted children to rise. On the other hand his wife felt compelled to prove that the child was god sent and gifted. Dibs husband wanted nothing to do with his child and in sense children can feel the negative energy. In fact, both Husband and wife was nearly on the verge of institutionalizing Dibs. It was not until Dibs started showing tremendous growth before his mother finally revealed her role in her under developed child.
Axline methods and new solutions granted the child a chance to emerge from the continuous rejection. One of the special methods was isolating the child into an area of comfort. The most comfortable environment for Dibs was therapy sessions inside of a play area. The new environment allowed Dibs to discover himself in a space of security where he will not be quickly judged nor too excessively praised.
During the final conversation between Reb Saunders, Danny, and Reuven, Reb Saunders defends his method of raising Danny by noting that, “...I did not want my Daniel to become like my brother...Better I should have no son at all than have a brilliant son with no soul” (285). Reb Saunders assumes that if Danny were raised in silence, then he would obtain a soul unlike Reb Saunders’ brother who did not have one. Reb Saunders raises Danny in isolation due to his assumption that having intellect without a soul would make a person indifferent and uncaring. By only wanting what he presumes is most beneficial for Danny, Reb Saunders forms a barrier between him and a meaningful relationship with Danny. This approach of bringing up a child is the only one that Reb Saunders has previous knowledge and he realizes that, “..a wiser father... may have done differently. I am not... wise” (288). Once Reb Saunders understands the consequences of his irrational decision, it is too late to make amends. Silence strains their relationship and forces both Danny and Reb Saunders to become depressed and miserable. Despite raising Danny with good intentions, Reb Saunders feels remorse for not establishing an affectionate relationship with his son while he still had the chance. Furthermore, Reb Saunders yearns for Danny to become a tzaddik and tries fulfills his desire through restrained communication between his son. If Reb Saunders had created a lasting relationship with Danny then the same hope could have been achieved. For Danny to become a tzaddik without feeling compassion during his lifetime is difficult to demand. It may have been possible for Danny to develop the traits that his father requires of him if he was raised in a nurturing environment. Overall, Reb Saunders’ rationalization of his parenting technique is rendered useless as he comprehends what an ill-advised approach it
...olent incidences contrast in specific details and their fathers personas, both children lose their innocence and gain the experience and knowledge to question life and make logical decisions.
The children also argue with their mother often. The children think that their mother, with no doubt, will be perfect. They idealize their mothers as angel who will save them from all their problems, which the mothers actually never do. The children get angry at their false hopes and realize that their mothers aren’t going to...
Barbara believes that in using “psychopathology (Woods 14)” it helps links us to a deeper knowledge of our self-psychology. “Psychopathology is known as the scientific study of mental disorder (Mental Kowalczyk).”More often than not, this is caused by the neglect and abuse shown by parents or guardians of this child. Stated by Woods the “Psychological dysfunction(Woods 14)” of any child, gives everyone an understanding of the problems of COAs, and this severely distressed children who grow up in alcoholic homes. In Woods book she looks into the philosophy of a man named Freud. Freud deems to think that all of these problems are a part of this psychic concept of your id, ego, and superego. When it all comes down to Barbara, finding this all to be a something she calls an “inherent and pernicious flaw (Woods 24) in the COA. What she believes is their sense of familiarity or their security blanket. This gives the
I think Dibs acted this way because of his father’s attitude towards him. By his father being ashamed of him and locking him up all of the time, Dibs probably thought something was wrong with him and began to keep to himself. By having Dr. Axline in his life, Dibs became more normal because he was finally able to open up to someone and not be punished for speaking. By letting Dibs do things on his own, Dr. Axline helped Dibs realize that his level of dependency wasn’t as high as he thought it was.
Purvis, Karyn, David Cross, and Jacquelyn Pennings. "Truth-based relational intervention: interactive principles for adopted children with social-emotional needs." Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and development 2009: 3-20. Print.
... growth where a child is forced to start looking for solutions for everything that is wrong instead of simply being a child. This analysis prove that children have their own way of seeing things and interpreting them. Their defense mechanisms allow them to live through hard and difficult times by creating jokes and games out of the real situation. This enables then to escape the difficulties of the real world.
Early in the film , a psychologist is called in to treat the troubled child :and she calmed the mother with a statement to the effect that, “ These things come and go but they are unexplainable”. This juncture of the film is a starting point for one of the central themes of the film which is : how a fragile family unit is besieged by unusual forces both natural and supernatural which breaks and possesses and unites with the morally challenged father while the mother and the child through their innocence, love, and honesty triumph over these forces.
...reader to gain inside thought into how bad the mental condition is affecting him as his behavior allows for further indication of craziness as a result from the schizophrenia. The evidence presented in this play for the scientific explanation of this literary classic is quite prominent as it gives an insight into what a schizophrenic acts, thinks, and behaves like.
Whether a person’s life is something experienced authentically, or factually written down as literature, there are more complexities faced then there are simplicities on a daily basis. This multifariousness causes constant bewilderment and hesitation before any sort of important decision a person must make in his or her life. When it comes to characters of the written words, as soon sensations of ambiguity, uncertainty, and paranoia form, the outlook and actions of these characters are what usually result in regrettable decisions and added anxiety for both that character as well as the reader. Examples of these themes affecting characters in the world of fiction are found in the novel The Crying of Lot 49 by Thomas Pynchon, and the play Glengarry Glen Ross written by David Mamet. Throughout both of these texts, characters such as Oedipa Maas who allows these emotions to guide her in her journey of self discovery, and Shelly Levene who is so overcome with these emotions that they become his downfall. For both of these characters, these constant emotional themes are what guide their most impulsive actions, which can generally also become regrettable decisions. Even though it is a distinguishing factor of human beings, when these characters are portrayed in print, it somehow seems to affect the reader more, because they are able to see the fictional repercussions, and also know how they could have been avoided.
She also wanted to make a point that just because a child’s behavior is different from what is said to be normal it doesn’t always mean that it’s because of a mental illness. Some children have trouble being normal because they know that they are different from what’s being said to them, or how they see others behave. As a psychologist I don’t believe the author had any personal assumptions on Dibs because through their sessions she never once made him feel judged. When the sessions started she stated that the playroom was a place where Dibs could be his self and free of any judgment. She believed in the theories of development so that when she realized that Dibs is much more smarter than what he appears it surprised her, and because here’s this boy who hardly ever interacts with people knows things without having had achieved verbal language. The type of assumption I think this falls under is prescriptive. Even though Dibs disability was more internal than mental he still had the capacity to learn and had acquired quite a bit of knowledge already. Reading this book it surpassed my expectations and it shows that just because a child behaves differently or slowly mental disability doesn’t always have to be the answer. It also shows how being emotionally crippled can have an effect on how you develop all over. The author did an amazing job on getting Dibs to a better place emotionally. I enjoyed the fact that throughout their sessions she never made Dibs feel ambushed with trying to pin point a diagnosis for what was wrong with him. I believe this is what differed her from Dibs teachers, parents, and psychologist they believed that he was disabled mentally and they acted on it by making him feel like something was wrong with him. But with Ms.A every Thursday she treated Dibs like a normal child allowing him to himself for the first
As the couples’ argument intensifies any morals they have are thrown to the wind, they turn to despair trying to hurt their partner by taking the baby away with no regard to the little ones physical or emotional state, ultimately resulting in the baby being torn apart. Is it possible that the couples low social class has an impact on their ethical code in this story? Irving Howe writes a critical assessment of Carvers work stating, “They are not bad or stupid; they merely lack the capacity to understand the nature or their deprivation-the one thing, as it happens, that might ease or redeem it.” Would the betrayal that happened between the couple have a different outcome if they had a more comfortable living situation? What if they were a more educated couple, therefore having a better lifestyle? Would the baby still be alive if the couple was raised in a religious environment, or if they had the benefits and resources of a higher social
...ddler that the social worker had good reason to question the toddler’s attachment to his mother. However, it is also evident that there are other factors outside of the mother’s control that needed to be take into account before reaching a final conclusion.
Harlow’s experiment shows the connection of mother and child using monkeys. From this experiment you can see that withdrawal or removal can cause depression in the rhesus monkeys. Harlow further relates that to children and their mothers. Seeing that there was too much maternal contact he notes that over attachment can cause severe depression.
Furthermore, the experiment helps to advocate the idea that not everyone is ready for parenthood in general, people can get out of a relationship easily but getting out of being a parent is much harder. A brutal point made by Rollin is that “Motherhood can turn women into terrible people” and this is true based on the staggering amount of child abuse cases each year in the united states. Nothing can prepare adults for the responsibility of caring for a child and having the motherhood myth insinuate that every woman must instinctively want a child is ludicrous. There’s already so much pain in this world and parenthood doesn’t only affect the parents it also has a huge impact on the