In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr and the story, “Connectivity and it’s Discontents”, by Sherry Turkle both share their opinions about the internet and social media and the outcomes its has made on society. Both authors show facts of why they think the internet has made us into “pancakes” or as Turkle says, “Goldilocks.”
Carr shares about the way he struggles when reading and can’t stay focus. “My mind isn’t going—so far as I can tell—but its changing. I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I’d spent hours strolling through
…show more content…
long stretches of prose. That’s rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two pages or three pages” (qtd Carr 2).
This indicates how the internet has become the reason why we can’t concentrate . Many people would rather look up information on the internet, rather than reading books or get informed by doing research. Having this easy access of information makes it difficult to want to read for too long. Turkle mentions how technology has changed the way the world use to communicate. People no longer want to talk face-to-face they would rather send a text message. People except more from technology rather than communicating with eachother. The way both stories are different is Carr uses anecdotes to back up his information. Google’s world, the world we enter when we go online, there’s little place for the fuzziness of contemplation. Ambiguity is not an opening for insight but a bug to be fixed. The human brain is just an outdated computer that needs faster processor and a bigger hard drive(qtd Carr 11) This indicates we could be just as smart as Google but because we have accessed to this we’d rather not. Google wants to turn their search engine into an artifitual intelligence. This will make people become more unsocialized with the world. As Turkle mentions, the world is now full of modern
Goldilockses, people who take comfort in being in touch with a lot of people whom they also keep at bay (qtd. In Turkle 621). This is different from Carr’s article because he mentions how Google has become the reason people are lacking intelligence. Rather than Turkle’s story indicates how people have adapted to the modern technology and have become less socialized. Both stories mention the reasons why the internet and social media have changed the way we think and how the world has adapted to this. In Carr’s article he mentions historical facts such as the clock, and typewriter. He added this to make a point on how the internet has affected today’s society. In Turkle story, she mentions how people have become attached to technology and would rather have a robotic life. Both authors have a point on how advanced technology and social media have become and the way they’ve made a compact on society.
Carr’s message is that Google is not actually making people stupid. It is just making people forget the traditional sense of reading. He expresses that this is a cause for the lack of attention today’s world compared to the time when there were no computers, internet, or Google. I disagree with this argument. If an individual has the propensity to skim over information by nature, than that individual will always be searching for means to gather
In my opinion, Google does not make us stupid like Carr suggests in his article. Google may make us seem lazy because we do less reading and physical activity. Information found on websites helps people become smarter and able to learn subjects easier in school. In the end, Carr never really provides scientific evidence that shows the brain’s circuitry having actually changed. I generally agree with Gladstone’s views and think the mirror metaphor is a useful way of talking about the media’s role in a free society. I also think that the computer and the Internet have enhanced our abilities and increased our processing speeds for acquiring knowledge: making the human brain more efficient in multitasking. The young people who are growing up with this new technology will expand it’s future. Gladstone makes the case that media distributors, even ones that seem indestructible, are ultimately subject to the preferences of their audience: us. Citizens should take up the responsibility of learning about and interacting with valuable media sources and reject those that pander to the lowest common
His mind starts to drift away from the texts and he’s not really understanding the material that is right in front of him. He believes that if you don’t exercise your memory, then you can become more forgetful. Carr also believes this to be true because we are using the internet to look up answers for ourselves and not doing the research to find it ourselves. We’re not relying on our memory to remember what we read, we’re just looking for the answers.
Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and Sherry Turkle’s “How Computers Change the Way We Think” both discuss the influence of technology to their own understanding and perspective. The first work by Nicholas Carr is about the impact technology has on his mind. He is skeptical about the effect it could cause in the long term of it. He gives credible facts and studies done to prove his point. While Sherry Turkle’s work gives a broad idea of the impact of technology has caused through the years. She talks about the advances in technology and how it is changing how people communicate, learn and think. In both works “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and “How Computers Change the Way We Think” the authors present
In Is Google Making Us Stupid, Carr concerns about spending too much time on web, making people lose the patient and ability to read and think and changing people’s thinking behaviors. He gives so many points: he can not read lengthy article used to be easy; many author begin to feel that too much reading online let them hard to read and absorb a longish article; we put efficiency and immediacy above understanding when we read; The circuits in brain has been altered by reading habit.
If you find yourself skimming through pages, looking for bullet points and your mind wandering off, you might be suffering the effects of Google making you stupid. These are the things that Nicholas Carr talks about in his essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” was originally published in July 2008 in Atlantic magazine. Carr argues that the use of technology on the daily basis has made us unable to go into deeper thought about things. Along with the opinion of Scientists and other “literary types” he asserts that the web has indeed made us change the way we think. Power Browsing is the new way people are reading, this is where you look from title to title, surfing the web from link to link. Overall, he advocates that eventually our brains will
In the21st century, Amazing changes in communication has affected interpersonal relationships. Some prefer to use technology like Facebook, Line, and Wechat to communicate with their friends rather than talking in person. Communicating with technology will make them alienated. Interpersonal relationships are also important by personal talking, which may lead to improve relationships. In her essay, “Connectivity and Its Discontents”, Sherry Turkle believes technology weakens interpersonal relationship among friends, and relatives. In “Mother Tongue”, Amy Tan claims talking with her mother and husband in a personal way can improves their relationship. Using technology to communicate will alienate and widen the distance between friends; talking
In “Connectivity and its Discontents,” Sherry Turkle discusses how often we are found on our technology. Turkle states in her thesis “Technology makes it easy to communicate when we wish and to disengage at will.” In the essay are interviews on several different people, of all ages to get their view on the 21st century. Teens are starting to rely on “robot friendships,” the most communication teens get are from their phones. Are we so busy trying to connect to the media that we are often forgetting what is happening around us?
With the rise of technology and the staggering availability of information, the digital age has come about in full force, and will only grow from here. Any individual with an internet connection has a vast amount of knowledge at his fingertips. As long as one is online, he is mere clicks away from Wikipedia or Google, which allows him to find what he needs to know. Despite this, Nicholas Carr questions whether Google has a positive impact on the way people take in information. In his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Carr explores the internet’s impact on the way people read. He argues that the availability of so much information has diminished the ability to concentrate on reading, referencing stories of literary types who no longer have the capacity to sit down and read a book, as well as his own personal experiences with this issue. The internet presents tons of data at once, and it is Carr’s assumption that our brains will slowly become wired to better receive this information.
In Is Google Making Us Stupid, Nicholas Carr disputes that due to new digital tools, peoples’ ability to retain and acquire information has been negatively altered. Even though, we have information at our fingertips, we often don’t take the time to soak in all the information. Carr mentions Bruce Friedman, a blogger, who finds it extremely difficult to read a “longish article on the web” and to try to focus on the importance of the text holistically (Carr 316). This is an issue that many can relate even Carr knows that, “ the deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle (Carr 314). Additionally, media theorist Mcluhan describes the net as “chipping away [mental] capacity for concentration and contemplation” (Carr 315). In essences, Carr states that we are having less of an attention span and consequently, less patience for longer articles (Carr 314). Therefore, this affects media outlets such as magazines, newspapers, and other articles, because they must conform and shorten their texts to fit the status quo that people safely enjoy (Carr 321). In addition, the net forces people to be efficient, and so, causes people to “weaken [their] capacity for deep reading” (Carr 317). People are becoming more driven on how quick he or she has to do something rather than think why this text is important. As a consequence, Carr believes that we are starting to lose our ability to be critical readers and
In the two different texts titled “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, and “How Computers Change the Way We Think”, they both have unique points of view that not only complement each other, yet negate each other too. Carr’s essay focuses on how Google is changing the way we learn and look for new information. He mentions that he is not the only person to have noticed this, and goes on to give examples to help further explain how he and others came up with the idea. Turkle’s essay, titled “How Computers Change the Way We Think”, she focuses on the idea that technology itself is changing the way we interpret the information and why the material is sometimes different than how we remember it to be. She identifies numerous
Humans are living in the digital decade, generating the variety of media technologies to provide human the convenient information access. Nicolas Carr, an author of many books concerning technology and culture, expressed his skepticism about how the Internet impacts to human beings in the article: “Is Google making us stupid?”. Carr claims that the Internet has been changing the way human beings process information lowering the capacity for concentration and contemplation (Carr). Contrary to Carr’s argument, I have the positive perspective that the internet helps us smarter and people should concern about how they use the Internet instead of blaming this versatile tool
“I am not, talking to Sierra because she Facebook messaged me yesterday, and was really rude. She even said that she hated you.” In today’s world conversations like this are happening a lot more frequently, mostly because of the misunderstandings that can arise through text messaging, and emails. These types of disagreements happen because when texting someone you cannot hear their voice, or see their face, and this can lead to misconstruction of a person’s message. In Sherry Turkle’s essay “Connectivity and its Disconnects” Turkle says that technology is changing the way that we interact with each other. She explains that there is a “real” and “virtual world” in which we act in two completely different manners depending on which world we
In this piece he wrote about the many disadvantages that Google and the internet have made on the human race. He included some personal examples that he has had on the effects of the internet and its wide variety of information. Carr states in the second paragraph, “I’m not thinking that way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading.” and also “The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle.” These real life examples Carr writes of show that he has experienced many of the downfalls of the internet. He was an extremely intellectual man who read quite frequently and now has trouble even reading two or three pages because of the internet. He admits to finding himself getting fidgety and bored when attempting to read a long piece of work because he is used to the quick, immediate information that the internet gives
Everybody today has access to the largest information database in the world, the internet. The internet is an amazing tool that has allowed people to access tons of information at the click of a button. Recently, the existence of the internet has been questioned for actually making people less intelligent. In Nicholas Carr's article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” he talks about how the internet is rewiring the human brain and making it harder for people to focus. I agree with Nicholas Carr’s theory that the internet is affecting the general populations way of thinking, lack of empathy and is a distraction rather than a positive attribute to society.