Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racism prejudice
Racism is a powerful world in societies all over the world today. Regardless of where someone goes, racism in an inevitable act that is inflicted on a person whether they like it or not. In the essay, “Two Ways to Belong in America”, Bharati Mukherjee shares a personal experience that gives a sneak peek on how racism can impact one individual as her and her sister face the new laws on immigration in America. Brent Staples’ essay, “Just Walk on By”, also shares a personal experience of Staples, though he mainly addresses the quick assumptions people make about him just based off of his color. In his article, “Shooting an Elephant”, George Orwell tells of a man who faces an inner conflict between two races, and how it can affect the way a person …show more content…
acts around certain races of people. But despite the fact that people everywhere can understand racism and stand on a common ground as one unit of people, it has greatly impacted people globally in such a negative way that it has led to making quick assumptions and rules and weighs down the attitudes of majorities. Racism has led to making quick assumptions and creating rules that may restrict anyone outside the popular race of an area.
These reactions are based off of what people would like to call a “security blanket”. Staples makes this point when he mentions how “the proprietor excused herself and returned with an enormous red Doberman pinscher straining at the end of a leash” (2). Since they were placed in a setting of a jewelry store, the lady automatically assumed, since he was black, that he was going to try and pull a crime, like stealing jewelry. However, based off of how he speaks throughout the rest of his essay, it is safe to assume that he is not the kind of person who would do such a thing. It was wrong of the woman to immediately shut him out, along with his skin color, without even giving him a chance. Just likely, Staples shares his experience with another woman who was walking the same street as him at night. He tells how “to her, the youngish black man . . . seemed menacingly close” (1). It is safe to assume that her quick assumptions were based off of knowledge that she had already attained from hearing of thugs in the ghetto part of town. However, while it is understandable to say how she rather be safe than sorry, because she did not know him, it is also a point to make that he has done nothing that would inflict upon her in any way. Likewise, Mukherjee shares a conversation that she had with her sister, Mira, and how she exclaimed that “[she] felt manipulated …show more content…
and discarded” (2). She felt this way because the new laws were unjust in the name of immigrants that already lived in America. Mira was right to feel hurt, being an immigrant of Indian origin herself. Mukherjee herself also expressed her feelings of betrayal when the government decided to turn on immigrant communities with their “casual[y] racist outbursts” (4). The casualness of the government when it comes to race in America is a huge understatement when realizing how big of an issue racism really is. On that note, racism is a big issue that it is known worldwide, bringing people together to relate with one another through the pain they felt. Staples talks about his time when he was only a boy, when acting like a thug meant so many things that were meaningless. He remembers watching “poor and powerless young men [that] seem[ed] to take all this nonsense literally” (2). Likewise, the men he talked about were all different in their own ways, or as the men would call independent. But they all had one thing in common – they felt the wrath of racism, applying it to their everyday lives, only to end up somewhere that real bad people go. They all felt the need to have “power to intimidate” (Staples 2), a common misconception when it comes to the characteristics of black men. Mukherjee, likewise, expresses how ever since the “scapegoating of (‘aliens’ documented or illegal)” (2), they have acted like “more than ever, sisters” (2). She proposes that it was the racism of the government towards immigrants like Mukherjee and her sister that brought them closer as family members. They had something that they could both lean on, which increased the bond between them. As the main side effect of the racism, a drastic downpour of rain soaks the attitudes of people worldwide.
Orwell portrays this storm on “the greatest joy . . . to drive a bayonet into a Buddhist priest’s guts” (1). This is a weight pulling down on an attitude because due to previous context clues, it is apparent to see that he is not the kind of person to follow through with such drastic measures. His feelings derive from the racism between the British and the Burmans, which ultimately impacted him, being a British originated officer in a Burman village. Along with that, Mukherjee’s attitude changed for the worst when new immigrant laws were introduced. Her attitude change showed another side of her when issues that involved racism appeared. She decided that “[i]f America want[ed] to play the manipulative game, [she’ll] play it, too” (Mukherjee 3). Racism brought her down when assuming that, when reading about her, she is a generally happy person. But racism turned the beauty of her happiness into a tyranny of anger. As the caboose that followed along beind the long train of bad attitudes, the woman on the street who “cast back a worried glance” (Staples 1) was considered as Staples’ first victim to racism. Racism, as the storm cloud over the woman’s head, was the leading cause of the look on her face when she saw a black male following behind her. Surely she was not happy about it, and any mood other than happy has been brought down at some point from an original state of
happiness. This time, it just happened to be racism. Even though racism has grounds where people can gather in agreement, the influence it holds over people is still powerful enough to blind people from seeing the beauty of diversity, the only thing that can save people from the hatred that dampens their spirits. Racism, in all of its glorious negativity, is a major darkness that people live in. Some choose to accept it, but others decide to speak out and rebel just like the people in “Two Ways to Belong in America”, “Just Walk on By” and “Shooting an Elephant”. Racism is a common enemy. Rise against it.
Brent Staples’ “Just Walk on By: Black Men and Public Space” is about how racial profiling has affected his life and made him think of himself as a perilous person. He supports this argument by allowing the readers to see things from his point of view during the times when he was treated like an outsider because of the color of his skin, followed by sharing how the situation made him feel confused and foreign. Staples’ wrote this essay in order to make readers become aware of how often racial profiling actually happens among men. His intended audience is primarily people of color because that is what his essay focuses on, but the intended audience is also those who are not of color because the author is trying to convince them about the
The article “Black Men and Public Space” by Brent Staples, originally published in Ms. Magazine in 1986, under the title “Just Walk on by,” depicts the existence of racism within the unconscious prejudice of people. The main idea of this article is the fact that blacks are perceived as a violent and disastrous people, and this, in turn, puts them in danger. Staples uses a detailed imagery to illustrate the stereotype of individuals based on black people. In the article, the author portrays the poignant events that black people face and uses pathos to describe his melancholy of people judging him by his skin color. He attracts the focus of audience towards the main idea of this article by using onomatopoeia as well as diction. The usage of such rhetorical strategy has successfully clarified the main idea of the article and widened the approach of this article towards public.
Both authors have some of the same experience when it comes to racism and they don`t understand. Staples says “I was to become thoroughly familiar with the language of fear. At dark. Shadowy intersections. “I could cross in front of a car stopped at a traffic light and elicit the thunk, thunk, thunk, thunk of the driver— black, white, male, or female — hammering down the door locks.” Laymon has a similar experience when “we got close to Shonda`s Saturn and one of the men says. “Kiese write about this!” Then another voice calls me a “Nigger” and Shonda a “nigger bitch” I think and feel a lot but mostly I feel that I can’t do anything to make the boys feel like they`ve made us feel like right there.” After reading these experiences both authors have a sense of fear from the side effects of racisms.
Society also thinks of Staples as a threat and feels as though he should not have rights like the ones around him. Others also feel as though he is dangerous and think that he is capable of doing harmful acts. Staples mentions in the passage “After a few more quick glimpses, she picked up her pace and was soon running in earnest. Within seconds she disappeared into the cross street” (357). Staples figures there is not anything he can do to solve this issue and his conclusion was to change the way he acts around people so they are no longer afraid.This shows that society fears him and do not want anything to do with him. The ones around him try to get away from him as quick as possible that shows that they think of him as a threat and want to keep their distance. This helps readers understand the text by showing them that they fear him because they run away and keep their distance because they see him as a nuisance and someone to
From beginning to end the reader is bombarded with all kinds of racism and discrimination described in horrific detail by the author. His move from Virginia to Indiana opened a door to endless threats of violence and ridicule directed towards him because of his racial background. For example, Williams encountered a form of racism known as modern racism as a student at Garfield Elementary School. He was up to win an academic achievement prize, yet had no way of actually winning the award because ?The prize did not go to Negroes. Just like in Louisville, there were things and places for whites only? (Williams, 126). This form of prejudice is known as modern racism because the prejudice surfaces in a subtle, safe and socially acceptable way that is easy to rationalize.
Racism is against equality, divides unions and promotes stratification. The differences that humans have created between race are some of the causes of America's division. From thousands of years ago, racial injustice has meant oppression for Hispanics, Asians, and blacks primarily. Although racism is not as visible nowadays, it still exists, but it is more subtle, which means that sometimes it is difficult to identify an action that has a discriminatory purpose. In the article “The Great White Way” by Debra J. Dickerson, she presents the impact that race has in America, and emphasizes the real purpose of having the “whiteness” status. Similarly, in the letter to his teenage son called “Between The World And Me” written by Ta-nehisi Coates,
Through his narrative structure, selection of detail, and manipulation of language, Staples demonstrates his understanding of his presence threatening pedestrians. Discrimination is not uncommon, and, sadly, this distorted world will never be rid of it. However, one should still strive to get to know someone before making assumptions about them, as the old saying goes, “Never judge a book by its cover.”
He does so by giving personal accounts of this horrific discrimination and utilizing descriptive vocabulary that get the audience to notice a sense of knowledge within the author. He begins to discuss the judgment he faced by stating “I grew accustomed to but never comfortable with people crossing to the other side of the street rather than pass me” (Staples, 189) which allowed the audience to step into the Staples’ shoes and somewhat experience the treatment he endured on a daily basis due to his appearance. The author also justifies his credibility by giving further examples such as when he was racially profiled in a jewelry store to the point where a woman worker brought out a red Doberman pinscher. By implementing these appeals to ethos, Staples was able to effectively convince the audience that he was a credible witness regarding these unjustifiable acts by describing to the reader events that he himself experienced. He was able to put forth this example which not only various African-American males could relate to, but also one that he himself personally endured which assisted in further strengthening his argument and successfully pulling the audience towards his
Staples concentrates on how black men were being taken a gander at by the way they convey themselves or by the way they were wearing open spots. Staples was taken a gander at as a black man who needed to take or hurt somebody each time he was within the sight of a white people. Staples likewise clarified how as a young man he saw extreme folks going to prison and how he 's lost his sibling, high school cousin, and dear companion. He was practically expelled from an occupational building because the director had confused him for a thief. Following quite a while of being mixed up for a criminal Staples discovered that on the off chance that he would avoid potential risk to make himself less undermining. He does that by changing his physical conduct.
Namely, he gets his message across to his audience with the use of imagery. Even so, he says that when he’s out walking the streets of Brooklyn at night, he finds that women “set their faces on neutral”, place their purses “across their chest bandolier style”, and “forge ahead as though bracing themselves from being talked” (Staples 543). With this use of imagery, Staples is able to place an image in the reader’s head of a young women walking the streets- alone, tense, and skittish- all because of man who, unbeknownst, means no harm to her. This denotes the theme of racial profiling in society because it shows the woman’s fear of an African American walking the streets, whom of which has not made one advance or threatening move towards the woman. The woman’s ability to assume the worst in the blink of an eye shows how society has been drilled with the influence of stereotypes and racial profiling. This leads to the fact that an innocent man is being ridiculed for the color of his skin while he had done nothing to cause such actions. Moreover, the description of the woman’s reaction to Staples makes the audience pity him because of his innocence in the cruel and unfair situation and unwillingness to be anybody other than an innocent bystander. Additionally, Staples’ use
In the two essays, “Just Walk on By: A Black Man Ponders His Power to Alter Public Space” by Brent Staples and “I’m Not Racist But…” by Neil Bissoondath, there are both differences and similarities. The two authors differ in their opinion on the causes of racism and life experiences involving racism, but are similar in regards to the use of stereotypes in the world
The essay “Stranger in the village” by James Baldwin, and “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, share a similarity in their experience in a new environments. Orwell a British officer he was not warmly welcome, the Burmese people hated. As for Baldwin it is more of racism than hated. Both essays happen in unfamiliar places where there were racism and discrimination. They do not fit in with the natives and is judged because of their nationalities. However, the themes of these writing differ.
In conclusion, racism is a big issue in the United States affecting not just only foreigners but also citizens. Leslie Marmon Silko as a mixed-ancestry-person has had to face discrimination and racism in the United States. The author feels very proud of her family because racism did not grow up in her hometown along with her. Moreover, she shows her sympathy to undocumented immigrants by pointing out the cruelty that Border Patrol offices do not just to them but also to citizens. Also, her tone is very disappointing and angry because of what is going right now with the United States and the Border Patrol making racism stronger and stronger overtime making some rights, such as freedom start to vanish all because of the same issue, which is racism.
He creates this tone to convey his purpose to the reader which is that prejudice is still an ongoing problem in American society, and that it will never be a thing of the past. Staples gives many personal anecdotes that are very somber; the readers are affected by this because they can emphasize and feel the prejudice that the victim, Brent Staples, faces. Although Staples is never delighted with the positions he is in, he never shows his resentment. In one part of the article, Staples said, “It is not altogether clear to me how I reached the ripe old age of twenty-two without being conscious of the lethality nighttime pedestrians attributed to me.” (Staples, 2). Staples attributes that he knows many people in American society automatically assume that he is a threat to “their” society because of
In the scene where Mrs. Thayer had the car accident. Who would have thought it would be the same officer to arrive at the scene? The same officer who nearly took all her dignity away, was there full heartily ready to save her life. He went in that burning car without hesitation. He recognized who she was and still without a doubt in his heart he saved her from that burning car. His racial mindset was somehow put to the side, and his instinct of a decent human being came forth into play. Maybe he did act in a racist way because of the situation his dad was going through, but is that a good enough reason? Mrs. Thayer did not trust his judgment at the time of the burning car. You or anyone else in her shoes would have felt as if this would have been the end of life. In the end, I think the whole situation left her quite confused. Not knowing who this officer was by his actions, but feeling merciless. Her reaction was to feel grateful for his kindness that amazed her in a