Analysis Of A Shopkeeper's Millennium

1845 Words4 Pages

Paul E. Johnson displays incredible insight on the 1820s to the 1830s in his book “A Shopkeeper’s Millennium” of how the changes in Rochester evolved socially, economically, and spiritually. It was widely accepted and was told to be brutally honest about the intentions of the elites of the time The truth that was spilled onto the pages and were revealed masterfully through his work. It took many years of tracking down enough primary sources to write the book. He touches broadly on all points of change in Rochester. Johnson gives unique insight through primary sources that shatter the previous theologies of the growing society in Rochester. Johnson starts by showing how class relations had rapidly evolved in the 1820s to the 1830s. In the 1820s They decided that if they could not make them obey through example of the higher class, than they would try and shame them into listening. The higher class would come to twist the thoughts of society creating a division in the classes through religion. Johnson shows this by explaining how every shop came on board with the idea of the banning of alcohol, “In workshop after workshop, masters gathered their men and announced that they would no longer provide drinks or allow drinking in the shop, and that the new rules derived from patriotism and religion.” This was their tactic of trying to use religion in justifying why they could enforce a no drinking policy inside of the workshop. There came to be another thing that the religious gentlemen wanted to control, the Erie Canal. When it was built, boaters started to bring about supplies through Rochester. The problem was that they came through seven days a week, including the Sabbath. This angered many church members that men would work on the Lord’s day. The group that came to oppose the Erie Canal boaters called themselves Sabbatarians. They tried to get boaters to stop coming through whether if it was through peaceful boycotting or stopping them by force. This only set a bad example for the working-class when the church members started using violence on the water merchants. This ended up doing no good other than splitting the population and defined who was against who. With the lower class not caring about religion and doing as they pleased behind the masters backs There came to be a separation socially and physically inside of the streets. The poor only hung out with the poor and the rich only hanging out with the rich. The middle-class needed to close the gap and they felt that religion was still the way to do it. So they decided to bring in evangelists to try and start

More about Analysis Of A Shopkeeper's Millennium

Open Document