Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Current ratio essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Current ratio essay
Chapter 5: Analysis and Interpretation Ratio Analysis of Mahindra Comviva’s Competitors Interpretation 1. CURRENT RATIO • The ideal Current Ratio for a company is 2:1 which shows short-term solvency position of the company and availability of current assets for every one rupee of current liability. As current ratio above the ideal ratio represents not efficient usage of current assets. • Thus, it is analysed OnMobile have better current ratio of 1.74:1 in the year 2014 as compared to IMImobile. 2. DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO • Debt to equity Ratio represents long-term solvency position that indicates relation between the amount of assets financed by creditors and the amount of assets financed by stockholders. Lower Ratio is considerable …show more content…
NET PROFIT MARGIN • It is the ratio of net profit (after tax) divided by net sales. It determines the financial performance of the company. It should be as maximum as possible for a company. • Thus, IMIMobile have better and maximum net profit margin of 9.029 in the year 2014. 9. WORKING CAPITAL RATIO • It is the ratio of current assets over current liabilities. It determines the financial health of a company to pay off its short term obligations. • Thus, IMIMobile have better and maximum working capital ratio of 4.22:1 in the year 2014. 10. CASH TURNOVER RATIO • It is the ratio between cash equivalent + marketable securities to current liabilities. It is the most conservative liquid ratio • Thus, IMIMobile have better and maximum cash turnover ratio of 0.72 in the year 2014. Thus, these are various financial ratios showcasing financial performance of competitors of Mahindra Comviva which are helpful in setting benchmark position for company. Chapter 6: Findings and Suggestions Findings The study conducted on Financial System of Telecommunication Industry of Mahindra Comviva shows the analysis of financial performance within the following context. Major findings …show more content…
Mahindra Comviva has recently changed its method of revenue recognition i.e. a shift from Completed Service Contract Method to Proportionate Completion Method as it measures revenue proportionately by reference to the performance of each act. 3. For Software Company a new guideline or a standard is defined in US GAAP as well INDIAN GAAP: - Multiple Element Arrangements to allocate revenue among accounting periods when certain elements are delivered over more than one period. 4. Difference between US GAAP and INDIAN GAAP while allocating consideration for revenue recognition in Multiple Element Arrangements is that US GAAP identifies according to Vendor specific Objective Evidence of Fair Value whereas INDIAN GAAP identifies according to Relative Fair Value. 5. As competitors of Mahindra Comviva, IMImobile has a better financial performance than OnMobile which is judged through the results of various financial ratios. Thus, this justify that relatively IMImobile sets a benchmark position or goal standards for the company for future prospects and better management. 6. Financial Ratios unfolds the strengths and weaknesses of the company. It provides quantifiable metrics which is beneficial for comparative analysis.
Suppliers are mostly concerned with a company 's ability to pay on their liabilities. Therefore, the current ratio and the quick ratio are both looked at by suppliers. The current ratio takes a company’s current assets and divides that by the company’s current liabilities. This number is
Net working capital represents organization’s operating liquidity. In order to compute the net working capital, total current assets are divided from total current liabilities. When there is sufficient excess of current assets over current liabilities, an organization might be considered sufficiently liquid. Another ratio that helps in assessing the operating liquidity of as company is a current ratio. The ratio is calculated by dividing the total current assets over total current liabilities. When the current ratio is high, the organization has enough of current assets to pay for the liabilities. Yet, another mean of calculating the organization’s debt-paying ability is the debt ratio. To calculate the ratio, total liabilities are divided by total assets. The computation gives information on what proportion of organization’s assets is financed by a debt, and what is the entity’s ability to pay for current and long term liabilities. Lower debt ratio is better, because the low liabilities require low debt payments. To be able to lend money, an organization’s current ratio has to fall above a certain level, also the debt ratio cannot rise above a certain threshold. Otherwise, the entity will not be able to lend money or will have to pay high penalties. The following steps can be undertaken by a company to keep the debt ratio within normal
Equity ratio and debt ratio are both very important because it shows how much of the assets used for production is really owned by the owner of a company. According to calculations in the appendix, RBC has the highest equity ratio and the lowest debt ratio. This is considered favourable compared to Sun life and BMO’s equity and debt ratio. When it comes to return on total assets BMO has the highest return. Meaning it is earning more per assets than RBC and Sun
Another observation is that GM looks to use more debt financing that equity financing for funding their activities. The debt to equity ratio has steadily decreased over the past five years and is higher that the industry average. Also, the current and quick ratios are much lower than the industry averages. This again can pose so...
The first analysis will be on Verizon. The current ratio and the debt to equity ratio both improved in 2006 when compared to 2005. However, the net profit margin dropped from 9.8% to 7.0%. What does this tell us as investors...
This ratio helps in analysing the position of the company to satisfy its short term debts within a period of one year. The higher the current ratio would be the more the company will be in position to satisfy its short term debts.
Financial Strength (mrq) -. Quick Ratio 0.49 Current Ratio 1.46 LT Debt/Equity 110.07 Total Debt/Equity 118.25 Mgt. Effectiveness (ttm) - a. Return on Investment % 13.23%. Return on Assets % 9.09%. Return on Equity % 25.77%.
After analyzing the financial statement, I was able to determine several interesting aspects: a .52 debt ratio shows appeal to lenders; a current ratio of 6.31 is very impressive. Seeing that inventory is so unstable and subject to many natural extraordinary events, the more important acid test shows Mondavi has a comfortable, but less impressive ratio of 1.54.
Current Ratio – For the last three years was growing from 3.56 in 2001 to 3.81 in 2002 to 4.22 in 2003. The reason of grow is increased in Assets. Even though Liability was growing, Asset grow was more significant.
This is a trend table of industrial average financial ratio for the previous five years in comparison:
In regards to the corporation’s balance sheet, it is necessary to place an importance on liquidity ratios to demonstrate the company’s ability to pay its short term obligations such as accounts payable and notes that have a duration of less than one year. These commonly used liquidity ratios include the current ratio, quick ratio, and cash ratio. All three ratios are used to measure the liquidity of a company or business. The current ratio is used to indicate a business’s ability to meet maturing obligations. The quick ratio is used to indicate the company’s ability to pay off debt. Finally the cash ratio is used to measure the amount of capital as well short term counterparts a business has over its current liabilities.
The horizontal analysis shows that IQ’s total current assets increased by 25% and its total current liabilities increased by 40% during 2005. This is largely explained by the increase in trade receivables, the increase in inventory, the increase in trades payable, and the increase in term loans (notes 5, 6, 12, and 13 of the 2005 financial statement). The higher increase in total current liabilities than in total current assets explains why the current and acid-test ratios decreased from 4.66 to 4.17 and from 4.02 to 3.5, respectively. However, IQ seems to remain highly liquid considering the values of the mentioned liquidity ratios.
Ratios traditionally measure the most important factors such as liquidity, solvency and profitability, as well as other measures of solvency. Different studies have found various ratios to be the most efficient indicators of solvency. Studies of ratio analysis began in the 1930’s, with several studies of the concluding that firms with the potential to file bankruptcy all exhibited different ratios than those companies that were financially sound.
It simplifies the comprehension of financial statements. Ratios tell the whole story of changes in the financial condition of the business.
3 0.36 4 0.48 2 0.24 Financial position 0.10 3 0.30 4 0.40 3 0.30 Profit Margin 0.11 3 0.33 4 0.44 3 0.33 Consumer loyalty 0.10 3 0.30 3 0.30 2 0.20 Value added services 0.06 3 0.18 3 0.18 2 0.12 Price Competition 0.10 3 0.30 3 0.30 3 0.30 Technology 0.06 3 4 0.40 4 0.40 3 0.30 TOTAL 1.00 3.35 3.43 2.57 This comparative analysis provides important internal strategic information. Numbers reveal the relative strengths of firms, but their implied precision is an illusion. Key performance indicators Source: TRAI, Crisil Research 1.