Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparative analysis of working capital management techniques
Research proposal on working capital management
Working capital and current assets management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Current ratio may be defined as the relationship between Current assets and Current liabilities. This is, also known as a working capital ratio, because it is related to the working capital of the firm. The current ratio is an important and most commonly used ratio to measure the short-term financial strength or solvency of the firm. It is calculated by dividing the total of current assets by total of current liabilities.
Current ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities (Or) Current Assets : Current Liabilities
The two basic components of this ratio are: current assets and current liabilities. A relatively high current ratio is an indicator of the firm is liquid and as the ability to pay its current obligations
…show more content…
The term liquidity refers to the ability of a firm to pay its short term obligations as and when they become due. As asset is considered liquid if it can be converted into cash without loss of time or value. Cash is the most liquid asset. Other assets which are considered to be relatively liquid and included in the quick assets are accounts receivable (i.e., debtors and bills receivable), short-term investments,Stock or Inventory excluded because it is not easily and readily convertible into cash. Similarly, prepaid expenses, which cannot be converted into cash and be available to pay off current liabilities, should also exclude from liquid assets. The quick ratio can be calculated by dividing the total of the quick assets by total of current liabilities. …show more content…
A firm with a debt-equity ratio of 2 or less exposes its creditors to relatively lesser risks. A firm with a high debt-equity ratio exposes its creditors to greater risk. A high debt-equity ratio which indicates that claims of outsiders (creditors) or greater than those of owners, may not be considered by the creditors because it gives lesser margin of safety for them at the time of liquidation of the firm. In the same way, a very low ratio is not considered satisfactory for the shareholders because it indicates that the firm has not been able to low-cost outsiders funds to magnify their earnings.
4. Return on Equity
In a real sense, ordinary shareholders are the real owners of the company. They assume the highest risk in the company. They are entitled to all the profits remaining after all outsider claims are met preference dividend paid. In view of this, the profitability of a firm should be assessed in terms of return to the equity shareholders.it is calculated by dividing profit after taxes and preference dividend by the equity capital.
Return on Equity Shareholders funds = PAT – Pref. Dividend / Equity Shareholders
These ratios can be used to determine the most desirable company to grant a loan to between Wendy’s and Bob Evans. Wendy’s has a debt to assets ratio of 34.93% while Bob Evans is 43.68%. When it comes to debt to asset ratios, the company with the lower percentage has the lowest risk. Therefore, Wendy’s is more desirable than Bob Evans. In the area of debt to equity ratios, Wendy’s comes in at 84.31% while Bob Evans comes in at 118.71%. Like debt to assets, a low debt to equity ratio indicates less risk in a company. Again, Wendy’s is the less risky company. Finally, Wendy’s has a times interest earned ratio of 4.86 while Bob Evans owns a 3.78. Unlike the previous two ratios, times interest earned ratio is measured on a scale of 1 to 5. The closer the ratio is to 5, the less risky a company is. From the view of a banker, any ratio over 2.5 is an acceptable risk. Both companies are an acceptable risk, however, Wendy’s is once again more desirable. Based on these findings, Wendy’s is the better choice for banks to loan money to because of the lower level of
Net working capital represents organization’s operating liquidity. In order to compute the net working capital, total current assets are divided from total current liabilities. When there is sufficient excess of current assets over current liabilities, an organization might be considered sufficiently liquid. Another ratio that helps in assessing the operating liquidity of as company is a current ratio. The ratio is calculated by dividing the total current assets over total current liabilities. When the current ratio is high, the organization has enough of current assets to pay for the liabilities. Yet, another mean of calculating the organization’s debt-paying ability is the debt ratio. To calculate the ratio, total liabilities are divided by total assets. The computation gives information on what proportion of organization’s assets is financed by a debt, and what is the entity’s ability to pay for current and long term liabilities. Lower debt ratio is better, because the low liabilities require low debt payments. To be able to lend money, an organization’s current ratio has to fall above a certain level, also the debt ratio cannot rise above a certain threshold. Otherwise, the entity will not be able to lend money or will have to pay high penalties. The following steps can be undertaken by a company to keep the debt ratio within normal
When comparing the debt-to-assets ratio of McDonalds and Wendys, you have to divide the firms total liabilities by their total assets. Essentially, the debt-to-assets ratio is the primary indicator of the firms debt management. As the ratio increases or decreases, it indicates the firms changing reliance on borrowed resources. The lower the ratio the more efficient the firm will be able to liquidate its assets if operations were discontinued, and debts needed to be collected. In 2005 Wendy's had $2,076,043 worth in total assets and $846,264 in total liabilities. When divided, Wendys has the lower ratio of the two competitors at 40%. This means that they would take losses of 40% if operations were shut down, and the cash received from valuable assets would still be sufficient to pay off the entire debt. It also means that 40% of Wendys assets are made through debt. McDonalds in 2005 had $12,545.3 (in millions) of total liabilities and $22,534.5 (in millions) of total assets. After doing the math, McDonalds ends up with a ratio of 56% which is higher than Wendys by sixteen percent. This means that there is more default on McDonalds liabilities, which can be a costly event from lenders perspective. McDonalds makes 56% of all its assets through debt. In reality, its not good to have a debt-to-assets ratio over 50%. Its also not good to have a debt-to-assets ratio that is too low because...
This ratio helps in analysing the position of the company to satisfy its short term debts within a period of one year. The higher the current ratio would be the more the company will be in position to satisfy its short term debts.
The consistent high spending of capital equipment is the first reason why one would recommend reducing the debt to equity ratio. A company with higher levels of debt is less flexible in being able to adjust to new market demands and conditions that require the company to make new products or respond to competition. Looking at the pecking order of financing, issuing new shares to fund capital investing is the last resort and a company that has high levels of debt, must move to the equity side to avoid the risk of bankruptcy. Defaulting on loans occur when increased costs or bad economic conditions lead the firm to have lower net income than the payments on loans. The risk of defaulting on loans and the direct and indirect cost related to defaulting lead firms to prefer lower levels of debt. The financial distress caused by additional leverage can lead to lower cash flows available to all investors, lower than if the firm was financed by equity only. Additionally, the high debt ratio that Du Pont incurred also led to them dropping from a AAA bond rating to a AA bond Rating. Although the likelihood of not being able to acquire loans would be minimal, there are increased interest costs with having a lower bond rating. The lower bond rating signals to investors that the firm is more likely to default than if it had a higher (AAA) bond rating.
Current ratio: This number is found by dividing the current assets by the current liabilities that is found on the balance sheet. The current ratio for 2010 was .666. This was calculated by $1550,631 / $2,326,966. The current ratio for 2011 was .905. This number was calculated by $1,543,816 / $1,705,132.
Current Ratio – For the last three years was growing from 3.56 in 2001 to 3.81 in 2002 to 4.22 in 2003. The reason of grow is increased in Assets. Even though Liability was growing, Asset grow was more significant.
When analyzing Apple’s Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio, the ratio is lower than the average industry. The ratio shows 11.96 times in account receivable collections during the year and how efficiently Apple uses its assets (Miller-Nobles, Mattison and Matsumura 781-782). Account receivable collections will increase after the release of the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6Plus by mid-September. Therefore, increasing the ratios of account receivable turnover and inventory turnover.
Here the selected firm is a bank and hence the conventional ratios may not hold the same significance as it does for the firms in other industries. For a bank the deposits is their liabilities and hence the loans which banks gives are their assets. Thus the bank balance sheet will consist of only the deposits and the loans. Hence the current ratio will not make the same sense as it does for other firms. The current ratio of the firm is 0.209. Since the bank does not have inventories and other short term assets, quick ratio cannot be calculated or is the same the current ratio since there are no inventories. Also the cash ratio is also the same as the current ratio for the reasons mentioned above (Wells Fargo, 2014).
Debt-to-equity ratio: Evaluates the capital structure of a company. A ratio of more than 1 implies that the company is a leveraged firm; less than 1 implies that it is a conservative one. Debt-to-equity ratio formula is Total liabilities / Total Equity. In 2017, Costco Debt equity ratio was 2.28. This means Costco will not be able to generate enough cash to pay its debt
Before beginning an analysis of a company it is necessary to have a complete set of financial statements, preferably for the pas few years so that historical trends can be obtained. Ratios are a way for anyone to get an idea of the financial performance of a company by using the information contained in the financial statements. Ratios are grouped into four basic categories, liquidity, activity, profitability, and financial leverage. This document will use a variety of these ratios to analyze the firm, Sample Company, as of December 31,2000.
In regards to the corporation’s balance sheet, it is necessary to place an importance on liquidity ratios to demonstrate the company’s ability to pay its short term obligations such as accounts payable and notes that have a duration of less than one year. These commonly used liquidity ratios include the current ratio, quick ratio, and cash ratio. All three ratios are used to measure the liquidity of a company or business. The current ratio is used to indicate a business’s ability to meet maturing obligations. The quick ratio is used to indicate the company’s ability to pay off debt. Finally the cash ratio is used to measure the amount of capital as well short term counterparts a business has over its current liabilities.
Most of these ratios are also below the desired levels such as the debt to tangible net worth and debt to worth going well under 1 and even below 0.5. These are unfavorable figures and would deny the company any finances when
Ratios traditionally measure the most important factors such as liquidity, solvency and profitability, as well as other measures of solvency. Different studies have found various ratios to be the most efficient indicators of solvency. Studies of ratio analysis began in the 1930’s, with several studies of the concluding that firms with the potential to file bankruptcy all exhibited different ratios than those companies that were financially sound. Among the study’s findings were that the deciding factor of the predictor of bankruptcy should not be only a few ratios, as the measure of a company’s financial solvency may differ as the firm’s situations differ. The important question is to which ratios are to be used and of those ratios chosen, which ratios are given priority weight.
The capital structure of a firm is the way in which it decides to finance its operations from various funds, comprising debt, such as bonds and outstanding loans, and equity, including stock and retained earnings. In the long term, firms seek to find the optimal debt-equity ratio. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of different capital structure mixes, and consider whether this has any relevance to firm value in theory and in reality.