BMO Life Insurance Company Financial Analysis Using the 5 different ratio analysis used earlier to analyse BMO life insurance company’s Q2-2015 Consolidated Income statement and Q2-2015 Consolidated Balance sheet. BMO’s profit margin is 9.79%1. Meaning BMO earns more net income per $1 of sales than some or even most of its competitors. This can be rated as favorable in comparison to its industry average of 9.58%. BMO’s days’ sales uncollected is 21.84days2 favorable when compared to its industry’s average of 98.59 days. This means that BMO can liquidate it receivables in lesser days than some or most of its competitors. BMO’s equity ratio shows that the owners of the company only owns 10.66%3 of the company’s assets. Compared to its industry …show more content…
Which sense that, Sun Life earns more net income per $1 of sales than some or even most of its competitors. Sun life’s days’ sales uncollected 58.8days7 is favorable when compared to its industry’s average of 98.59 days. This means that Sun Life access its money in receivables faster than some or most of its competitors. Sun life’s equity ratio shows that the owners of the company only owns 10.18%8 of the company’s assets. Compared to its industry average, Sun Life can be rated as more favorable. Sun life’s debt ratio of 90.35%9 is higher than its equity ratio this is considered risky because the huge percentage of its asset is supported by debt. However, Compared to its industry average of 93.2% it is still considered favorable. Sun life’s return on total assets is 0.798%10 this favorable compared to its industry average of …show more content…
Meaning RBC isn’t operating in efficiency compared to its industry. BMO, RBC and Sun Life Insurance comparison Of the three insurance companies Sun life has the highest profit margin. Meaning it is operating more efficiently and earning more per $1 in sales than its two competitors. Whereas, RBC has the lowest profit margin of the three; which is not favourable. When it comes to days’ sales uncollected, BMO has the highest number of days. This means that it takes more days for BMO to turn its receivables into cash than its two competitors. This is unfavourable compared to RBC’s which has the lowest days’ sales uncollected. Equity ratio and debt ratio are both very important because it shows how much of the assets used for production is really owned by the owner of a company. According to calculations in the appendix, RBC has the highest equity ratio and the lowest debt ratio. This is considered favourable compared to Sun life and BMO’s equity and debt ratio. When it comes to return on total assets BMO has the highest return. Meaning it is earning more per assets than RBC and Sun
company, the benefit of bringing in a 35% net income outweighs the cost of a 2% loss of interest
This requirement makes it important to look through a majority of the return ratios, which include return on sales, return on assets, and return on equity. Additionally, investors are also interested in the ratios related to the company’s earnings, such as earnings per share (EPS) and PE ratio. Looking at return on sales, we can see that Wendy’s has a 7.27% return on sales and Bob Evans has a 1.23%, which demonstrates Wendy’s has a higher profit margin. Moreover, Wendys’ return on assets is 2.85% and Bob Evans is 1.58%. Also, Wendy’s and Bob Evan 's have return on equity ratios of 6.66% and 4.30%, respectively. All of these return ratios show that Wendy’s has a better handle on turning working capital into revenue. On the other hand, although Wendy’s return ratios are higher than Bob Evans, Bob Evans has a better performance on earnings per share and PE ratio. This is due to Bob Evans having less common stock share outstanding, which makes their earnings per share and PE ratio higher than Wendy’s. Due to the EPS being higher for Bob Evans, we would recommend that investors look towards Bob
Credit Risk: Financial instruments that possibly subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash equivalents and receivables. Due to its large and varied customer base and its geographic diversity, Saputo has low exposure to credit risk concentration with respect to customer’s receivables. There are no receivables from any individual customer that exceeded 10% of the total balance of receivables as at March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014. However one customer represented more than 10% of total consolidated sales for the year ended March 31, 2015, with 10.2% (one customer with 11.4% in 2014). Allowance for doubtful accounts and past due receivables are reviewed by management at each balance sheet date. The company updates its estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts based on the assessment of the recoverability of receivable balances from each customer taking into account historic collection trends of past due accounts. Receivables are written off once determined not to be collectible. On average, Saputo will generally have 10% of receivables that are due beyond normal terms, but are not decreased. However, Saputo management does not believe that these allowances
The first analysis will be on Verizon. The current ratio and the debt to equity ratio both improved in 2006 when compared to 2005. However, the net profit margin dropped from 9.8% to 7.0%. What does this tell us as investors...
In conclusion, we have realized the significance of including just the netted plan assets and the PBO and not including the full amount of the plan assets and the PBO on the balance sheet. This type of accounting flexibility by the FASB helps companies and ultimately hurts investors who are unaware of the consequences. Usually, the estimated PBO and plan assets are very large in relation to the debt and equity capitalization of the company. The financial situation is therefore skewed and is not represented correctly on the company’s balance sheet which then in turn distorts financial ratios. Investors who are unaware of these accounting rules will end up making erroneous conclusions. Also, this accounting flexibility allows managers to manipulate financial statements whether intentionally or unintentionally by influencing their actuarial assumptions.
In 2001, Salem Telephone Company created a subsidiary, Salem Data Services (SDS). The intent of creating SDS was to provide a revenue stream to subsidize the telephone operations and alleviate the need for a rate increase. Unfortunately, after 3 years, SDS has not met profit expectations. In fact, SDS continued to experience losses at the rate of $40-$45k per month making it necessary to reassess operations. While providing services to both internal and external customers, SDS found that their computer system had surplus capacity to support additional commercial sales. Based on the amount of unsold monthly computer hours, Salem Data has about $190k of revenue potential from the commercial sales. With increasing pressure from shareholders and record low financial performance, Salem Telephone reexamined the current business model for SDS. However, Salem Data’s ability to reduce costs is limited based on 91% of expenses being fixed presents a challenge to overcome losses. The following analysis is an overview of performance, assessment of costs and estimates for possible effects of increasing profits concluded by a future recommendation for Sales Data Services.
All profitability ratios for Billabong are negative for the company. As calculated in appendix 2.1, the return on equity ratio has declined annually and is at -4% in 2013. A high sustained ratio is attractive to any investor but Billabong’s ROE is undesirable. A downward trend is also seen for the return on assets ratio which has decreased from 13% in 2009 to only 2% in 2013. This means the company is unable to generate significant profits from the assets invested. The gross profit margin and profit margin show that Billabong is not making substantial earnings in 2012 and 2013. Comparatively, the cash flow to sales ratio also states that the business is not generating high earnings from their sales. Moreover, the company does not issue dividends in 2013 which is a large contrast to 2011 where the dividend payout rate was 115%.
The first method we will review is the accounting method. Through this accounting approach we will analyze specific ratios and their possible impact on the company's performance. The specific ratios we will review include the return on total assets, return on equity, gross profit margin, earnings per share, price earnings ratio, debt to assets, debt to equity, accounts receivable turnover, total asset turnover, fixed asset turnover, and average collection period. I will explain each ratio in greater detail, and why I have included it in this analysis, when I give the results of each specific ratio calculation.
The consistent high spending of capital equipment is the first reason why one would recommend reducing the debt to equity ratio. A company with higher levels of debt is less flexible in being able to adjust to new market demands and conditions that require the company to make new products or respond to competition. Looking at the pecking order of financing, issuing new shares to fund capital investing is the last resort and a company that has high levels of debt, must move to the equity side to avoid the risk of bankruptcy. Defaulting on loans occur when increased costs or bad economic conditions lead the firm to have lower net income than the payments on loans. The risk of defaulting on loans and the direct and indirect cost related to defaulting lead firms to prefer lower levels of debt. The financial distress caused by additional leverage can lead to lower cash flows available to all investors, lower than if the firm was financed by equity only. Additionally, the high debt ratio that Du Pont incurred also led to them dropping from a AAA bond rating to a AA bond Rating. Although the likelihood of not being able to acquire loans would be minimal, there are increased interest costs with having a lower bond rating. The lower bond rating signals to investors that the firm is more likely to default than if it had a higher (AAA) bond rating.
McBride Financial Services is a regional mortgage company that becomes the most advanced mortgage company in the Midwest. This company gives low cost mortgage services by using the state-of-the art technology to help homebuyers. The McBride also offers conventional, FHA, and VA mortgage loans for the customers who are purchasing or refinancing at the lowest possible rate. In addition, this company provides credit report , home inspection, and an appraisal of $ 1,500.00 for a fixed price for its customers(Apollo 2004).
The analysis of these ratios shows how Ford stands as a company for the past five years. Return on equity (ROE) reveals how much profit a company earned in comparison to the total amount of shareholder equity on the balance sheet. For long-term investing with great rewards, companies that have high return on equity ratios can provide the biggest payoffs. This ratio also tells investors how effectively their capital is being reinvested, so it is a good gauge of management's money handling skills. Ford is showing a considerable turn around in this area this past year, which could easily be due to changes in management. They are also reasonably following the industry in this area.
BlackBerry realized that their inventory was not selling as quickly as they anticipated. The longer their inventory stayed in their holding facility, the more their financial statements suffered. This not
In 2006, Progressive’s investment income funded their 1.1 billion dollar stock buyback. Since insurance companies do not carry any inventory, the quick ratio is not relevant to the
Brit + Co is a media company that inspires, educates and entertains real women with a creative spirit. The “Brit Girl” uses creativity and a do-it-herself attitude in all aspects of her life: To take charge of her career, forge strong friendships and relationships, curate her own style, decorate her home, and entertain a crowd. Through our content, online classes and products, we enable her to use creativity to shape her future.
All the more particularly, this decides the ability to absorb misfortunes, fund its extension, pay profits to its shareholders, and develop an adequate level of capital. Being front line of defense against the destruction of a capital base from misfortunes, the requirement for high profit and earnings can scarcely be overemphasized. Although diversifying pointers are utilized to fill the need, the best and most broadly utilize indicator is a Return on Assets (ROA). ROA is employed by establishments and banks to outfit them with an important instrument for evaluating their progress, including utilization of assets and financial quality (Haque, 2014). Then again, for inside and out examination, an alternate pointer Net Interest Margins (NIM) are likewise utilized. Chronically unfruitful money related establishment’s hazard bankruptcy. Contrasted and most different pointers, inclines in gains can be hard to decipher for cars, abnormally high benefit can reflect excessive danger