Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ibsen and femenism
Analysis of a doll's house
Analyze a doll house
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ibsen and femenism
Analysing the Plot and Sub Plot of A Dolls House by Henrik Ibsen
As another year goes by I am now writing a piece of coursework for AS
drama, this particular piece will be about a not so well known play
called ‘A dolls house, written by Henrik Ibsen. In particular I will
by studying carefully and analysing the plot and subplot of the play.
The play was wrote in the 1800’s and was first performed in Copenhagen
during the winter of 1879. Most of Ibsens plays were based around the
issues during that era, as was a dolls house covering forgery,
feminism, freedom, independence, love?, stereotypes, and duty all in
the main plot. The subplot covered issues like; loneliness, widowed,
manipulation, deception/secrets and the new woman. To convey the
issues there where two characters in the main plot, these were Nora
and Torvald (the husband and wife living in the “dolls house”. As the
story unravels we discover many different things but we also find out
that Nora is in every scene to show how she has adapted to living her
lifestyle and how she is slowly moving out of it and into another.
Torvald is also in most scenes but always seems to be in his office
hard at work trying to earn money for Nora and the family, as most
families would be in this century. Then there are two other characters
running the subplot these are Mrs Linde and Krogstad both of these
convey how Nora’s life could be if she were to separate from he
husband, Torvald, showing how hard it is to be a part of society. Mrs
Linde feels that Nora leads the perfect lifestyle with a happy family
where as Nora feels that Mrs Linde has the better lifestyle, being
free.
The features of the subplot are shown via the main plot, this is to
show a variety o...
... middle of paper ...
...bsen had to re-write the
play with an alternate ending, as they did not want to show that women
can be more powerful than men. The ending was that Nora broke down in
tears and stayed after Torvald forcing her to see her children. The
normal ending was described as an act of barbarous violence.
Through researching and thoroughly studying the play act by act I have
learnt that not only was the subplot just as important as the main
plot but how they were run through each other and the impact it had. I
also gathered more information on what life was like during the 1800’s
and how controlling the male was over the female during them times.
The play also gave a great insight to how widowed and/or single adults
were treated back in them days. So if you ever read the play I hope
you enjoy it as much as I did and get a good understanding of all the
key issues.
Structure – The work is formatted to be a play. It has three acts, each beginning with stage directions.
Throughout the play we never get to know who the real Nora is and what her true personality consists of. Nora also realizes that she does not know who she is, and decides to leave her life. She comments that she needs to discover who she is separate from her husband, children and more importantly society. Nora feels she is not respected, and she is a “doll” to her husband.
In the play A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen, several literary lenses can be used to better help understand the storyline. The most prominent lens used throughout this play is gender. It plays a large role in the story A Doll’s House. Nora, the protagonist is faced with many challenges because of the normalities of 19th century society. She must overcome these difficulties throughout the play.
...ome from different worlds, yet they still share the same type of sadness and pain in their everyday lives. What Nora does is considered courageous in that time in history, where women were not treated as equals and were always looked down on and ignored. Women speaking out and taking matters into their own hands was unheard of and often risky. They want to be independent so they do what they believe is necessary to accomplish and reach their goals, so that they can once again be happy for eternity.
The words predator and prey paint images animals. There are only two outcomes in the situation these words suggest. One animal will escape with its life, and one animal will go hungry, or one animal will have a meal, and one will make sacrifice its life for the other’s nourishment. Predator and prey can also describe the actions of people. There are some preconceptions of which people will play the role of predator and which will play the role of prey, men usually predator, and women usually prey, but in his play A Doll House Henrik Ibsen plays with these expectations, and depicts many different people taking on the roles of predator and prey in the society of 19th century Norway. Within A Doll House, Ibsen employs diminutive language, illness,
5. Ford, Karen. "Social contrains and painful growth in A Doll's House". Expanded Academic ASAP. Methodist College , Fayetteville , NC . 30 Octuber 2005
Investigation of Power in Ibsen’s ‘A Doll’s House’. Nora Helmer is introduced in Act I as a character subjugated to the wills and desires of her husband; she is merely an object. Torvald, he possesses a. At the conclusion of Act III however, she has. become sufficiently independent to arrive at her decision to leave.
An underlying theme in A Doll's House, by Henrik Ibsen, is the rebellion against social expectations to follow what one believes in their heart. This theme is demonstrated as several of the play's characters break away from the social norms of their time and act on their own beliefs. No one character demonstrates this better than Nora. Nora rebels against social expectations, first by breaking the law, and later by taking the drastic step of abandoning her husband and children.
As people grow up, they tackle their own challenges, fears begin to fester and grow inside of them. These fears have the potential to change the way people will live out their day-to-day life. Along with fears is foresight. This can aid people in the search for how to overcome, or work around their fears. Foresight can also help people picture how their fears may affect their life. Both fears and foresight have the potential to offer people life-altering choices that will help people grow. Fear and foresight can both have a large part in influencing life-altering choices, just as Nora Helmer, Florentine and a choice of my own, all illustrate.
Those of you who have just read A Doll's House for the first time will, I suspect, have little trouble forming an initial sense of what it is about, and, if past experience is any guide, many of you will quickly reach a consensus that the major thrust of this play has something to do with gender relations in modern society and offers us, in the actions of the heroine, a vision of the need for a new-found freedom for women (or a woman) amid a suffocating society governed wholly by unsympathetic and insensitive men.
Henrik Ibsen’s “A Doll’s House” a nineteenth century play successfully uses symbolism to express many characteristics of Helmer’s life, together with the way that the main character Nora feels towards her marriage at the end of the play. Ibsen’s use of symbolism to convey about the social setting, including the harsh male-controlled Danish society, seen mostly in Torvald in the play and the role of women, signified mostly in Nora. These symbols act as foretelling before the tragic events at the end of the play, as they show the problems which lead to the demise of the Helmer’s ‘perfect’ family life.
[This is the text of a lecture delivered, in part, in Liberal Studies 310 at Malaspina University-College, Nanaimo, BC, Canada. References to Ibsen's text are to the translation by James McFarlane and Jens Arup (Oxford: OUP, 1981). This text is in the public domain, released July 2000]
On the other hand, towards the end of the story, Nora exhibits the independence and
In Henrik Ibsen’s A Dollhouse he introduces Nora Helmer as the “spend thrift” of the family. Torvald was against her spending money habits and he warns her that she can't get into debt. Little did he know she was holding a big secret behind his back for several years. During the play, Krogstad reveals her secret to Torvald that she forged her father's signature after his death.
Societal problems prevail throughout the history of the world and exist within all countries, regions, and cultures. The controversial aspects in societies are based on a large variety of subjects, and have to be identified in order to cause societal change. Therefore, Realism is the portrayal of difficulties in societies that are depicted in everyday life, which includes common situations and actions. Realism allows authors to describe and emphasize the incompetence of some aspects within communities, while enabling writers to call for societal reform. Henrik Ibsen portrays and addresses the concepts of Norway’s society in the 19th century in A Doll House, which is a tragic play translated by Rolf Fjelde. Ibsen desires to challenge assumptions as well as rules of Norwegian life, and most importantly wants to depict society accurately, as he meticulously incorporates everyday life. Therefore, A Doll House represents a Realistic drama due to the issues involving women, illnesses, and laws within the play, while conveying Ibsen’s desire of controversy and change in Norway’s society.