An Analysis of Polyeucte by Pierre Corneille

1250 Words3 Pages

An analysis of Polyeucte by Pierre Corneille reveals that the presence of God’s grace is evidently alive and can be seen in the character’s actions and choices throughout the play. At the beginning of the play, the main character Polyeucte is immediately thrown into a dilemma, to be baptized or not to be baptized. On one hand he fears his wife, who is a non-Christian will become angry with him for going through with the baptism. On the other hand, his friend Nearchus urges him to become a Christian as soon as possible. The question then becomes how the role of grace affects not only Polyeucte’s actions but all the main characters in the play. Grace is defined by the Merriam Webster Dictionary, as “unmerited divine assistance given humans for their regeneration or sanctification”. This leads us to trying to figure out where grace is present in the play.
A very brief summary of Polyeucte, begins in Act I, where Paulina, the wife of Polyeucte confesses she was in love with a man named Severus before she married Polyeucte. Paulina has since been convinced that Severus died in battle; however her father, Felix is introduced into the play and announces that Severus is alive and is frightful that he has come to seek revenge against him because he rejected Severus Paulina’s hand in marriage. Polyeucte and his friend Nearchus get baptized and become Christians and when Felix learns of this he immediately puts Nearchus to death in order to strike fear into Polyeucte and make him to recant. Paulina begs her father to not put Polyeucte to death but her father is scared that Severus is plotting something against him and executes Polyeucte. Right after the moment that Polyeucte becomes a martyr, Paulina converts to Christianity and Felix f...

... middle of paper ...

...mans did not need grace and that humans were predestined to be saved or not to be saved. They had no choice in what their fate was to become so grace did not play any role in their lives. The nonexistent of grace is seen in Corneille’s counterpart at this time period in French Theater, Jean Racine. Comparing both of their famous works, Polyeucte to Jean Racine’s Phaedra, differences are clearly evident in both playwright’s beliefs and ideals. A result of this was from both playwrights upbringings and culture of society surrounding them growing up. The role of Racine’s Jansenism beliefs comes directly from him studying at Port Royal which was ruled by Jansenists. On the contrary Corneille grew up surrounded by Jesuit beliefs so this tells us the major difference between the two. The absence of grace in Racine’s Phaedra in comparison to Corneille’s Polyeucte is huge.

Open Document