At the beginning Greenpeace is established by several activists in order to protest American nuclear weapons test in 1971. And it becomes a global non-profit organization aims to expose global environmental issues and force methods for a green future nowadays (Huebner, 2006). Furthermore, a variety of non-violent demonstrations and campaigns were organized to against not only nuclear weapons but also others environmental problems like genetic enhancement, hydroelectricity ,wind power, nuclear power, forestry, to name but a few. However, there is a big debate on the actions, which were taken by those environmental groups such as Greenpeace. The statement” The environmental groups Greenpeace is taking the wrong position on environmental issues” is incorrect. That means the environmental groups Greenpeace is right especially its attitude towards the controversial issues, like nuclear power and genetic enhancement and salmon farming.
The stance and attitude taken by Greenpeace on nuclear power is convincing and trustworthy. Some people may argue that nuclear power is an efficient way to tackle energy shortage as it can replace non-renewable energy like fossil fuels and it does not exhaust greenhouse gases. They claimed this is a more reliable and eco-friendly energy resource (Moore, 2005). That is why those people in favor of the development on nuclear energy. However, they are wrong because their arguments have drawn some false conclusions on this issue and they have fallacy on interpret Greenpeace position on nuclear power.” Greenpeace is not solely oppose the development on nuclear energy, but they raised some concerns about nuclear power. “We are concerned about a little thing called radioactive waste and the fact that nuc...
... middle of paper ...
...at Greenpeace against from genetically enhancement food and salmon farming.
To sum up, Greenpeace is not taking a wrong position on environmental issues. They just take a post on telling us what are wrong on nuclear power, food production. They point out some bad effects that we may not notices or concerns, which will be harmful to us in long term. Greenpeace helps our society, our world enhance the awareness on those environmental issues. Although these advices may not sound to everyone, it is very important for our future, for next generation! Save our world be consider and balance both pros and cons. Meanwhile, be green is not just saying, we need to do it and make it happen. Greenpeace just an organization that promote green, no matter you think it is wrong or not, save our world need our own force and action! Do it right now, it is better late than never!
He delves into the history of the word “environmental” as well as the history of environmental activism. He pinpoints the beginning of the movement to Rachel Carson. According to Quammen, she began the revolution by publishing her book Silent Spring. He says the negative connotations of the word began with her book, pairing “environment” and “the survival of humankind” as if they go hand in hand. This played a major role in the distortion of the word and the intentions of environmentalists.
It does not matter what are environmentalists are reasoning and what is behind their movement. Someone that agree with Sober can answer that always the corrects reasoning is matter and we should support the actions that there are a proper reason behind that otherwise we could be not sure what is the right
The two essays by Michael Pollan and Curtis white talk about climate change in regards to the relationship between the environment and human beings. Although the two essays share the same topic, they take the subject and engage the readers in totally different points of views. Pollan’s essay talks about global and ecological responsibility being a personal virtue while Curtis discusses the socio-economic or political issues underlying sustainability (Pollan; White). These two essays are very different in terms of voice; however these pieces of writing are both important for people all over the world to read. Climate change and environmental disasters are a real issue. Just this year, there have been more storms, cyclones, earthquakes and typhoons all over the world. One cannot look at the state of many developing counties where the majority of the population is exposed and vulnerable to the effects of climate change. This issue on developing a viable solution for the problem of anthropogenic gases and global warming is long from being found. Not only this, many people do not want to hear about this issue since they do not think it is real. Unless people have tangible proof that their cars, thermostats and aerosol cans are contributing to climate change, they are not going to give up their lifestyles. By synthesizing the two essays, one can see that there is a need for change and that it is not an issue which should be dealt with in terms of ecological factors or even personal virtue. The social, economic and political factors affecting this problem and the move towards real sustainability should also be a topic that will raise awareness.
(Action): If we don’t do our part to stop the expansion of nuclear power plants, the future of our planet will be bleaker. Every year, thousands of more pounds of nuclear waste will be buried underground and the damage to our environment increases. There are more efficient energy sources other than nuclear power and we must do our part today to prevent a catastrophic future for our children. The dangers that nuclear power plants pose for the United States are very real. There are many alternative renewable sources of energy available to us such as wind and solar power, which provide a much safer and efficient alternative to nuclear power. You alone have the power to speak up and act against the expansion of this dangerous energy. The future of our environment’s safety and our nation’s energy supply lies in your hands.
In 1989, seventy five percent of Americans identified themselves as environmentalists, and the number has continued to grow since then (Walls 1). Environmentalism is now the most popular social movement in the United States, with over five million American families donating regularly to environmental organizations (Walls 1). Environmentalists today focus on what kind of world they hope to see in the future, and largely deal with limiting pollution and changing consumption rates (Kent 1 and 9). Modern environmentalists also have much different issues than those Carson’s America faced. With climate change becoming more threatening each year, protection of the natural world is needed more than ever. Pollution has caused the warmest decade in history, the deterioration of the ozone layer, and species extinction in extreme numbers (Hunter 2). It not only threatens nature, but also human populations, who already suffer from lack of clean water and poisoning from toxic chemicals (Hunter 16). Unlike environmental actions in the 1960’s, which were mostly focused on protection, a massive increase in pollution has caused efforts to be focused on environmental restoration (Hunter 16). Like in the time of Silent Spring, environmentalists are not only concerned with one country. Protecting the environment remains a global issue, and every nation is threatened by the
Not only is nuclear power friendly to the environment, but it is almost always available, and many countries are starting to use it more. Renewable energy sources like solar and wind en...
In conclusion, there are different opinions on the issue of the use of nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is only one of many energy options. Nuclear power can decrease pollution to the environment because it does not produce harming gases like other plants do. However, there are also drawbacks that can influences human health by emitting radioactive substances. Thus, all parties should make a deeper research and analysis based on the argument to decide the use of nuclear energy as a safe and cost effective source of energy.
...ver, it doesn’t answer the question “Can Nuclear Energy Be Green?” The article “Is Nuclear Energy the Solution?” by Milton Saier and Jack Trevors addresses various issues about why nuclear energy is not a good energy source. The article presents a lot of data regard to its sub-argument, and those data is really good support to the argument. The authors compare the Nuclear energy with other energy sources, and state that “between 1000 and 2000 new nuclear reactors would have to be built around the globe to achieve a meaningful impact on CO2 emissions” (446). The author concludes that nuclear energy is not a good energy source to use, due to its costs and risks. In general, the essay presents a good point, but it doesn’t really answer the question. However, the article can be a good supplement to the yes side argument to assess that is nuclear energy really “green.”
Hawken writes that the movement, a collective gathering of nonconformists, is focused on three basic ambitions: environmental activism, social justice initiatives, and indigenous culture’s resistance to globalization. The principles of environmental activism being closely intertwined with social justice rallies. Hawken states how the fate of each individual on this planet depends on how we understand and treat what is left of the planet’s lands, oceans, species diversity, and people; and that the reason that there is a split between people and nature is because the social justice and environmental arms of the movement hav...
There have been many world changes since 1945 to now. Many think the whole idea and trend of the world becoming ecofriendly and “green” started in the 1970s. This was started with the book Silent Spring which is an environmental science book by Rachel Carson published in 1962 and becoming popular in the 1970s. This trend had more impact on daily life then most believed it would and changed the way many people viewed their personal affect on the world.
a action for Greenpeace sometimes means that you have to break the law or at
Greenpeace is an independent organization campaigning to ensure a just, peaceful, sustainable environment for future generations. It began in Canada in 1971 and today has a presence in more than 40 countries with 2.4 million supporters worldwide. Greenpeace Australia was founded in 1977 and today we have more than 75,000 supporters. Prevent dangerous climate change by phasing out fossil fuels (oil, coal, gas) and replacing them with clean renewable energy such as solar. Use the 2000 Olympic Games to showcase and implement solutions to global environmental problems, including alternatives to toxic materials and renewable energy.
There are two perspectives we must consider and understand before we can firmly criticize governments on putting their own national interest and economic growth, before acting on environmental concerns of the global community. In reality we have environmentalist clash heads with political candidates in various governments.
The Green movement began in the Western World during the 1970’s around the time of the Vietnam War. The green movement is a social movement regarding concerns for environmental conservation and improvements to the current health of the environment. The Green movement also promotes the conservation, restoration, and the overall improvement of our environment. Many people disagree with the green movement and its values because they don’t see the immediate benefits from them. However, supporting the green movement by recycling, researching alternative energy sources, and mandating eco-friendly laws will lead to a better, greener, country.
... By showing the world the severity of our need for conservation, we will be able to save the earth and get the most out of our resources. We need to fix this problem before it becomes uncontrollable to the point of having no resources to meet our needs. By reducing our consumption of resources, we will be able to become closer to fixing the problem of global warming, high gasoline prices and pesticide-filled meats. The outcome of respecting our world and “going green” will better how we live our lives, our communities and the environment.