Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison on database management systems
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparison on database management systems
Comparison Summary
DBMS Server Comparison Supplement
An Analysis Of The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Big Six Database Servers.
In 1991 I performed a thorough evaluation and comparison of the four major DBMSs at the time: Informix, Ingres, Oracle, and Sybase. This comparison was done for a client building a huge distributed database application, currently in its second phase of d evelopment, with the first phase running successfully country-wide. At that stage, the distinguishing criteria were query optimizers, triggers, views, and support for distributed databases. Some products had these features, but some others' marketing per sonnel were just talking about them. For example, declarative integrity was a "future" that was at that stage only being phased into most of the DBMS products. It was relatively straightforward to draw up a checklist and fill it in with "yes" and "no" in the various columns.
Now, a mere five years later, these aspects - as well as many new features such as Internet support, remote procedure calls, and support for multiprocessor platforms - are standard items on each product's fact sheet and marketing material. On a very high level, DBMS products are becoming such commodity items in IT shops that it is almost possible to take a one-size-fits-all approach. On a detailed level, however, you must do a much more thorough evaluation. The products are evolving at such a fast pace, and their research and development teams are adding new features at such a rate, that simple yes/no entries in the comparison columns are just not enough. All of the comparisons would be similar, with mostly yes entries in each column and the odd no mar ked with an asterisk referring to a footnote saying, "Scheduled for the ...
... middle of paper ...
...and the World Wide Web in some way or another, they can basically be partitioned into two broad classes: script-based and server-based. Products such as Informix, CA-OpenIngres, and Syba se fall into the script-based class, in which you can include SQL operations or Perl scripts in your HTML Web pages or CGI scripts in order to access a specified database when the Web page is activated. The scripts must ensure that the data is returned i n an HTML-readable form. Products such as DB2, Oracle, and Microsoft SQL Server fall into the server-based class, in which a dedicated server process acts as a gateway to the designated databases to retrieve the required data and return it in an HTML-rea dable form. In addition, some of these products include tools to help you develop Web-oriented applications, such as the SQL Server Web Assistant that ships with Microsoft SQL Server.
The internet works on the basis that some computers act as ‘servers’. These computers offer services for other computers that are accessing or requesting information, these are known as ‘clients’. The term “server” may refer to both the hardware and software (the entire computer system) or just the software that performs the service. For example, Web server may refer to the Web server software in a computer that also runs other applications or it may refer to the computer system dedicated only to the Web server applicant. For example, a large Web site could have several dedicated Web servers or one very large Web server.
Once the new products are identified for your business (Milestone One), how has the use of technology helped or hindered this organization in determining which new products to
SQL Server 2000 vs Oracle 9i. Retrieved December 1, 2007, from MSSQLCity.Com Web site: http://www.mssqlcity.com/Articles/Compare/sql_server_vs_oracle.htm
The factors listed though impressive and quite thorough, lacks in three crucial factors we believe would make a deep influence in choosing a provider. They are future scalability and expandability, flexibility to adapt to probable changes during development and maturity of technology being used. Elaborating on why the above stated factors are important to be considered during the selection process, we believe that sufficient forethought and foresight needs to be put on to predict future demand and load on the software and evaluate if the provider can handle these predicted future requirements by upgrading and scaling their system. With a focus on agility, the SiL’K team needs to ensure if the providers are flexible enough to accommodate a change if one arises outside the scope of the initial requirement specification. This is more of a qualitative assessment. Lastly, the third factor stresses on evaluating the technology used in the provider’s implementation. Care must be taken to ensure though the technology can meet the current needs, it is of the modern age and has sufficient maturity to evolve over a period of time to enjoy advantages of new, upcoming enhancements.
Maher (1999) states that the different packages on the market have different strengths in different areas, it is important for the customer to recognise this and select the package with the strengths that are appropriate. Only when top management have reached consensus on what the business requires, should package vetting and selection begin.
In 1977, Larry Ellison, Bob Miner, and Ed Oates founded System Development Laboratories. After being inspired by a research paper written in 1970 by an IBM researcher titled “A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks” they decided to build a new type of database called a relational database system. The original project on the relational database system was for the government (Central Intelligence Agency) and was dubbed ‘Oracle.’ They thought this would be appropriate because the meaning of Oracle is source of wisdom.
Software products have high name recognition, broad-based corporate and consumer acceptance (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access), and numerous powerful features that are in use worldwide, thereby promoting standardization and competitive advantage through their ease of integration and cost-effectiveness
Sallam, (2011) developed a survey based on customers rating their BI platform designers. Sallam gathered data on major corporations such as IBM Cognos, Oracle, Microstratgey, and Microsoft to small companies such as Corda and Qliktech to compare end user satisfaction. “With the exception of development tools and BI infrastructure, in general, the satisfaction with capabilities rises along with the prevalence of use. Only reporting is used extensively by most respondents (68%) while six capabilities are extensively used by 25% or less. Use of reporting and ad hoc analysis experienced the most significant decline in extensive use while interactive visualization and dashboard use grew the most” (Sallam, p. 6, 2011). End users utilize BI that is easy to understand and offers them value. Some BI systems may be easy to use but offer no value to the end user or the system could offer value but its complexity reduces efficiency elsewhere muted or canceling out the BI systems
Almost all commercial database systems available today are designed to provide a high level of performance to its users. Nonetheless, Database Performance Tuning for large volumes of data is an arduous task. Even minor changes can bring about a substantial impact (positive or negative) on the performance of the system (KOCH, 2014).
The goal is to explore as many options for consultation and areas of potential data gathering. Ideally the use of software works to the benefit of any business small or large. Morgan Goods is committed to using the best processes to help the overall bottom line and reputation. This includes software such as Microsoft Access, Teradata, SQL and Oracle. Using these programs could help blueprint and spot any potential gaps in areas that need better processes.
These issues could have been resolved if a proper market analysis was done. An outcome of this research could have suggested that it best suites highly populated
DBA deals with all of this by finding user needs, set the database, and test the system. DBA should enable editing any system he or she created. At the same time DBA should ensure the security of the data and guarantee data integrity and backup. Moreover, DBAs should know the database management systems (DBMS) that include the knowledge of Oracle, IBM DB2, and Microsoft SQL server (“Database Administrator,” 2010). Oracle is one of the most important platforms that DBA must know and have experience with. According to Kanaracus “The database experience we look for most of the time is Oracle”, says Tom Hart, executive vice president of the operations and technology group at Veritude. “SQL Server is more of a nice-to-have"
A database management system, or DBMS, gives the user access to their data and helps them transform the data into information. Such database management systems include dBase, Paradox, IMS, and Oracle. These systems allow users to create, update, and extract information from their databases. Compared to a manual filing system, the biggest advantages to a computerized database system are speed, accuracy, and accessibility.
of multiple types of end users. The data is stored in one location so that they
In our world, people rely heavily on the power of technology every day. Kids are learning how to operate an iPad before they can even say their first word. School assignments have become virtual, making it possible to do anywhere in the world. We can receive information from across the world in less than a second with the touch of a button. Technology is a big part of our lives, and without it life just becomes a lot harder. Just like our phones have such an importance to us in our daily lives, database management systems are the same for businesses. Without this important software, it would be almost impossible for companies to complete simple daily tasks with such ease.